The potential impact of innovative transit finance : evidence from Florida

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS
E. Bierhanzl, G. Paul, K. Simmonds
{"title":"The potential impact of innovative transit finance : evidence from Florida","authors":"E. Bierhanzl, G. Paul, K. Simmonds","doi":"10.1400/16942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovative Transit Finance (ITF) is a concept that has become increasingly common in the discussion of transit policy in the U.S. ITF has also received increased attention from transit agencies themselves as they strive to maintain or increase service in the face of local government resistance to providing general revenue support. ITF is defined as revenue sources other than the traditional three: transit fares, general revenue funding of local governments, or intergovernmental transfers from the state or federal government. This article reports on a study that documents the changing nature of transit finance, and examines the state of ITF adoption among agencies in the state of Florida. The study was designed to assess how the ideas behind ITF are actually being put into practice through interviews with stakeholders and examinations of transit system structures. The authors examined the attitudes of stakeholders toward ITF both at the state and local levels, and explore the factors that are affecting the adoption of ITF programs. The authors found that rather than simply adopting a set of one-size-fits-all techniques from a limited menu of options, individual transit agencies have adapted a wide variety of techniques to suit their own unique needs. The authors conclude that, although the attitudes toward ITF are generally positive, actual implementation of ITF has been limited.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":"1000-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/16942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovative Transit Finance (ITF) is a concept that has become increasingly common in the discussion of transit policy in the U.S. ITF has also received increased attention from transit agencies themselves as they strive to maintain or increase service in the face of local government resistance to providing general revenue support. ITF is defined as revenue sources other than the traditional three: transit fares, general revenue funding of local governments, or intergovernmental transfers from the state or federal government. This article reports on a study that documents the changing nature of transit finance, and examines the state of ITF adoption among agencies in the state of Florida. The study was designed to assess how the ideas behind ITF are actually being put into practice through interviews with stakeholders and examinations of transit system structures. The authors examined the attitudes of stakeholders toward ITF both at the state and local levels, and explore the factors that are affecting the adoption of ITF programs. The authors found that rather than simply adopting a set of one-size-fits-all techniques from a limited menu of options, individual transit agencies have adapted a wide variety of techniques to suit their own unique needs. The authors conclude that, although the attitudes toward ITF are generally positive, actual implementation of ITF has been limited.
创新交通融资的潜在影响:来自佛罗里达州的证据
创新交通融资(ITF)是一个在美国交通政策讨论中越来越普遍的概念,它也越来越受到交通机构本身的关注,因为它们在地方政府拒绝提供一般收入支持的情况下努力维持或增加服务。ITF被定义为传统三种收入来源之外的收入来源:交通费,地方政府的一般收入资金,或州或联邦政府的政府间转移。本文报告了一项研究,该研究记录了过境融资不断变化的性质,并考察了佛罗里达州各机构采用ITF的情况。这项研究旨在通过与利益相关者的访谈和对交通系统结构的检查,评估交通运输基金背后的理念是如何实际付诸实践的。作者调查了州和地方两级利益相关者对创新创新基金的态度,并探讨了影响创新创新基金项目采用的因素。作者发现,不同于简单地从有限的选项菜单中采用一套一刀切的技术,各个运输机构已经适应了各种各样的技术来满足自己的独特需求。作者的结论是,尽管对创新技术基金的态度总体上是积极的,但创新技术基金的实际实施是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信