Two image quality assessment methods based on evidential modeling and uncertainty: application to automatic iris identification systems

Q2 Computer Science
Amina Kchaou, Sonda Ammar Bouhamed
{"title":"Two image quality assessment methods based on evidential modeling and uncertainty: application to automatic iris identification systems","authors":"Amina Kchaou, Sonda Ammar Bouhamed","doi":"10.1080/1206212X.2022.2162671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of an Automatic iris Identification System is impacted by both the poor quality of iris images and the uncertainty of information. Assessing image quality and rejecting poor-quality images can substantially improve the performances of the current biometric systems. The main idea behind our proposed Image Quality Assessment approaches is to take advantage, firstly, of the texture of iris images and, secondly, of the uncertainty of these information. This is achieved by defining a set of Contextual Quality Indicators extracted from the image texture and transforming them into Quality Assessment Criteria in the evidential framework, taking into account the information uncertainty degree. The Contextual Quality Indicators are defined based on a priori analysis of the context of the application. We use ‘iris’ as the context of application. Generally, only the normalized iris image is saved, i.e. the acquired iris image is not always available. So, the main advantage of our approaches over other related methods is that it can act in the normalization level of the processing chain to reject poor-quality images. So that, the subsequent Automatic iris Identification System can process only good-quality images, which result in better recognition rate performance. The functioning of our evidential approaches is illustrated using image samples from CASIA 1.0 database. The performance of over the proposed image quality assessment approaches is compared with the standard iris identification system without an image quality assessment step. A statistical test, based on 95% confidence interval, is used to assess if there is a statistically significant difference between the performances of the proposed approaches. The CASIA 1.0 has been used to make the comparison. The comparison results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed approaches for iris domain of applications. The source code of our paper is available at https://github.com/Sonda09/IIQA","PeriodicalId":39673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computers and Applications","volume":"214 1","pages":"254 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computers and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2022.2162671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The performance of an Automatic iris Identification System is impacted by both the poor quality of iris images and the uncertainty of information. Assessing image quality and rejecting poor-quality images can substantially improve the performances of the current biometric systems. The main idea behind our proposed Image Quality Assessment approaches is to take advantage, firstly, of the texture of iris images and, secondly, of the uncertainty of these information. This is achieved by defining a set of Contextual Quality Indicators extracted from the image texture and transforming them into Quality Assessment Criteria in the evidential framework, taking into account the information uncertainty degree. The Contextual Quality Indicators are defined based on a priori analysis of the context of the application. We use ‘iris’ as the context of application. Generally, only the normalized iris image is saved, i.e. the acquired iris image is not always available. So, the main advantage of our approaches over other related methods is that it can act in the normalization level of the processing chain to reject poor-quality images. So that, the subsequent Automatic iris Identification System can process only good-quality images, which result in better recognition rate performance. The functioning of our evidential approaches is illustrated using image samples from CASIA 1.0 database. The performance of over the proposed image quality assessment approaches is compared with the standard iris identification system without an image quality assessment step. A statistical test, based on 95% confidence interval, is used to assess if there is a statistically significant difference between the performances of the proposed approaches. The CASIA 1.0 has been used to make the comparison. The comparison results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed approaches for iris domain of applications. The source code of our paper is available at https://github.com/Sonda09/IIQA
基于证据建模和不确定性的两种图像质量评估方法在虹膜自动识别系统中的应用
虹膜自动识别系统的性能受到虹膜图像质量差和信息不确定性的双重影响。评估图像质量和拒绝低质量图像可以大大提高当前生物识别系统的性能。我们提出的图像质量评估方法的主要思想是首先利用虹膜图像的纹理,其次利用这些信息的不确定性。这是通过定义一组从图像纹理中提取的上下文质量指标,并将其转化为证据框架中的质量评估标准来实现的,同时考虑到信息的不确定性程度。上下文质量指标是基于对应用程序上下文的先验分析来定义的。我们使用“虹膜”作为应用程序的上下文。通常只保存归一化后的虹膜图像,即获取的虹膜图像并不总是可用的。因此,与其他相关方法相比,我们的方法的主要优点是它可以在处理链的规范化级别上起作用,以拒绝低质量的图像。这样,后续的虹膜自动识别系统就可以只处理高质量的图像,从而获得更好的识别率性能。利用CASIA 1.0数据库中的图像样本说明了我们的证据方法的功能。将所提出的图像质量评估方法与没有图像质量评估步骤的标准虹膜识别系统的性能进行了比较。基于95%置信区间的统计检验用于评估所提出方法的性能之间是否存在统计学显著差异。使用CASIA 1.0进行比较。对比结果表明了所提方法在虹膜领域应用的有效性。我们论文的源代码可以在https://github.com/Sonda09/IIQA上找到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computers and Applications
International Journal of Computers and Applications Computer Science-Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Computers and Applications (IJCA) is a unique platform for publishing novel ideas, research outcomes and fundamental advances in all aspects of Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Computer Applications. This is a peer-reviewed international journal with a vision to provide the academic and industrial community a platform for presenting original research ideas and applications. IJCA welcomes four special types of papers in addition to the regular research papers within its scope: (a) Papers for which all results could be easily reproducible. For such papers, the authors will be asked to upload "instructions for reproduction'''', possibly with the source codes or stable URLs (from where the codes could be downloaded). (b) Papers with negative results. For such papers, the experimental setting and negative results must be presented in detail. Also, why the negative results are important for the research community must be explained clearly. The rationale behind this kind of paper is that this would help researchers choose the correct approaches to solve problems and avoid the (already worked out) failed approaches. (c) Detailed report, case study and literature review articles about innovative software / hardware, new technology, high impact computer applications and future development with sufficient background and subject coverage. (d) Special issue papers focussing on a particular theme with significant importance or papers selected from a relevant conference with sufficient improvement and new material to differentiate from the papers published in a conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信