Абсурдные и парадоксальные пословицы в тувинском языке (онтологический и логический аспекты категоризации пословичной семантики)

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Evgeny E. Ivanov
{"title":"Абсурдные и парадоксальные пословицы в тувинском языке (онтологический и логический аспекты категоризации пословичной семантики)","authors":"Evgeny E. Ivanov","doi":"10.22162/2619-0990-2022-64-6-1373-1388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article deals with absurd and paradoxical proverbs resulting from the categorization of proverbial semantics according to the criterion of ‘relation to reality’ in the ontological or logical aspects. Goals. The study aims to identify quantitative and qualitative features of ontological and logical contradictions to reality traced in semantics of Tuvan proverbs. Materials and methods. The work analyzes a total of 770 Tuvan proverbs contained in Tuvan Proverbs and Sayings (1966), Proverbs and Sayings of the Tuvan People (2020), and other sources. The publication employs the author’s methodology for semantics categorization of aphoristic units and their differentiation into semantic types according to the criterion of ‘relation to reality’. Results. The article reveals that one in eight Tuvan proverbs literally (in the direct sense) contradict the existing order of things in the world. The ontological nature of a contradiction to reality in a proverb is implemented via the semantics of the absurd, which is motivated by a situational or verbal context, and it is impossible to interpret the literal content of the proverb — from the viewpoint of logical (rational) thinking — being unaware of that very context. The logical nature of the contradiction to reality in the proverb is implemented via the semantics of the paradox, which can be motivated epistemologically, semantically or formally, and logically. Only one structural part of a proverb can be contrary to reality, and this part always dominates in terms of general content. The Tuvan proverbs that contradict reality are distinguished by the presence of absurdity semantics in one of their structural parts, and that of paradox in the other one. Conclusions. An unexpectedly large number of absurd and paradoxical proverbs in the Tuvan proverb corpus attests to that it is reality’s perception and comprehension — based on the ontological and/or logical contradictions to objective reality — that take a significant place in the Tuvan view of the world.","PeriodicalId":36786,"journal":{"name":"Oriental Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oriental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2022-64-6-1373-1388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article deals with absurd and paradoxical proverbs resulting from the categorization of proverbial semantics according to the criterion of ‘relation to reality’ in the ontological or logical aspects. Goals. The study aims to identify quantitative and qualitative features of ontological and logical contradictions to reality traced in semantics of Tuvan proverbs. Materials and methods. The work analyzes a total of 770 Tuvan proverbs contained in Tuvan Proverbs and Sayings (1966), Proverbs and Sayings of the Tuvan People (2020), and other sources. The publication employs the author’s methodology for semantics categorization of aphoristic units and their differentiation into semantic types according to the criterion of ‘relation to reality’. Results. The article reveals that one in eight Tuvan proverbs literally (in the direct sense) contradict the existing order of things in the world. The ontological nature of a contradiction to reality in a proverb is implemented via the semantics of the absurd, which is motivated by a situational or verbal context, and it is impossible to interpret the literal content of the proverb — from the viewpoint of logical (rational) thinking — being unaware of that very context. The logical nature of the contradiction to reality in the proverb is implemented via the semantics of the paradox, which can be motivated epistemologically, semantically or formally, and logically. Only one structural part of a proverb can be contrary to reality, and this part always dominates in terms of general content. The Tuvan proverbs that contradict reality are distinguished by the presence of absurdity semantics in one of their structural parts, and that of paradox in the other one. Conclusions. An unexpectedly large number of absurd and paradoxical proverbs in the Tuvan proverb corpus attests to that it is reality’s perception and comprehension — based on the ontological and/or logical contradictions to objective reality — that take a significant place in the Tuvan view of the world.
图万语义分类的本体论和逻辑方面(本体论和逻辑方面)
介绍。本文从本体论和逻辑两方面探讨了根据“与现实的关系”标准对谚语语义进行分类而产生的荒谬和矛盾谚语。的目标。本研究旨在找出图瓦语谚语语义中本体论与现实逻辑矛盾的数量特征和质量特征。材料和方法。本书分析了收录在《图瓦谚语和谚语》(1966)、《图瓦人谚语和谚语》(2020)和其他资料中的770条图瓦谚语。本文采用作者提出的方法对警句单位进行语义分类,并以“与现实的关系”为标准对警句单位进行语义类型的划分。结果。文章揭示了八分之一的图瓦谚语在字面上(在直接意义上)与世界上现存的事物秩序相矛盾。谚语中与现实矛盾的本体论本质是通过荒谬的语义来实现的,而荒谬的语义是由情境或言语语境激发的,如果不知道那个语境,就不可能从逻辑(理性)思维的角度来解释谚语的字面内容。谚语中与现实矛盾的逻辑本质是通过悖论的语义来实现的,它可以从认识论、语义或形式、逻辑三个方面进行推理。谚语中只有一个结构部分是与现实相矛盾的,而这个结构部分往往在总体内容上占主导地位。与现实相矛盾的图瓦谚语的特点是,在其结构部分的一个部分存在荒谬语义,而在另一个部分存在悖论语义。结论。图瓦谚语语料库中大量的荒谬和自相矛盾的谚语证明,在图瓦人的世界观中占据重要地位的是对现实的感知和理解- -基于对客观现实的本体论和/或逻辑矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oriental Studies
Oriental Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信