COMBINATION OF GRAFTING TECHNIQUES TO CLONE SUPERIOR GENOTYPES OF Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marcos Jiménez Casas, B. González-Jiménez, Javier López-Upton, M. A. López-López, R. Rodriguez-Laguna
{"title":"COMBINATION OF GRAFTING TECHNIQUES TO CLONE SUPERIOR GENOTYPES OF Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et","authors":"Marcos Jiménez Casas, B. González-Jiménez, Javier López-Upton, M. A. López-López, R. Rodriguez-Laguna","doi":"10.47163/agrociencia.v56i5.2582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grafting in species of Pinus is used to establish asexual seed orchards. Generally, grafting success is low, therefore, it is required to study the influencing factors. Such as the technique and the contact surface of the cambium that depends on the length of the cut on the scion and the rootstock. The objective of this study was to evaluate graft success, growth, and needle development on Pinus patula grafts as functions of the grafting technique and cutting length. It was expected that a specific combination of technique and cutting length would allow predicting the graft success. The techniques of top cleft, side-veneer and splice grafting were used with three cutting lengths (1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 cm) in a completely randomized design with factorial array. The data were analysed with an analysis of variance and treatment means were compared with the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05). Sixty days after grafting, technique influenced success; top cleft grafting had the highest value (80%) but was not statistically different from side veneer grafting (73.3%). There was, however, statistical difference between top cleft and splice grafting (56.7%, p ≤ 0.05). There were no differences among the three cutting lengths in terms of the three variables evaluated. The effect of the interaction showed that top cleft and side veneer grafts with the cutting length of 1.5 cm expressed the greatest growth (32.4 and 32.2 mm, respectively); followed by side veneer grafting with the cutting length of 2.0 cm (30.4). The study demonstrated that the most viable techniques to increase grafting success in P. patula are the top cleft and side veneer techniques. Cutting length of the scion and the rootstock can be set within the range 1.5 to 2.5 cm","PeriodicalId":50836,"journal":{"name":"Agrociencia","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrociencia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v56i5.2582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Grafting in species of Pinus is used to establish asexual seed orchards. Generally, grafting success is low, therefore, it is required to study the influencing factors. Such as the technique and the contact surface of the cambium that depends on the length of the cut on the scion and the rootstock. The objective of this study was to evaluate graft success, growth, and needle development on Pinus patula grafts as functions of the grafting technique and cutting length. It was expected that a specific combination of technique and cutting length would allow predicting the graft success. The techniques of top cleft, side-veneer and splice grafting were used with three cutting lengths (1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 cm) in a completely randomized design with factorial array. The data were analysed with an analysis of variance and treatment means were compared with the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05). Sixty days after grafting, technique influenced success; top cleft grafting had the highest value (80%) but was not statistically different from side veneer grafting (73.3%). There was, however, statistical difference between top cleft and splice grafting (56.7%, p ≤ 0.05). There were no differences among the three cutting lengths in terms of the three variables evaluated. The effect of the interaction showed that top cleft and side veneer grafts with the cutting length of 1.5 cm expressed the greatest growth (32.4 and 32.2 mm, respectively); followed by side veneer grafting with the cutting length of 2.0 cm (30.4). The study demonstrated that the most viable techniques to increase grafting success in P. patula are the top cleft and side veneer techniques. Cutting length of the scion and the rootstock can be set within the range 1.5 to 2.5 cm
结合嫁接技术克隆松优良基因型。等
嫁接是一种建立无性种子园的方法。一般情况下,嫁接成功率较低,因此有必要对其影响因素进行研究。如技术和形成层的接触面,这取决于在接穗和砧木上切割的长度。本研究的目的是评价嫁接技术和刈割长度对马铃薯松嫁接成功率、生长和针叶发育的影响。预期技术和切割长度的特定组合可以预测移植物的成功。采用三种切割长度(1.5、2.0和2.5 cm)的顶裂、侧贴面和剪接技术,采用完全随机设计的阶乘阵列。资料采用方差分析,处理均数比较采用Tukey检验(p≤0.05)。移植后60天,技术影响移植成功;顶裂植骨率最高(80%),与侧贴面植骨率(73.3%)差异无统计学意义。顶裂与接枝间差异有统计学意义(56.7%,p≤0.05)。在三个变量评估方面,三种切割长度之间没有差异。交互作用的结果表明,截长为1.5 cm的顶裂接枝和侧贴面接枝的生长量最大,分别为32.4和32.2 mm;其次为侧贴面嫁接,切长2.0 cm(30.4)。研究结果表明,顶裂技术和侧贴面技术是提高马铃薯嫁接成功率的最可行的技术。接穗和砧木的切割长度可设定在1.5至2.5厘米范围内
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrociencia
Agrociencia 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: AGROCIENCIA is a scientific journal created and sponsored by the Colegio de Postgraduados. Its main objective is the publication and diffusion of agricultural, animal and forestry sciences research results from mexican and foreign scientists. All contributions are peer reviewed. Starting in the year 2000, AGROCIENCIA became a bimonthly and fully bilingual journal (Spanish and English versions in the same issue). Since 2007 appears every month and a half (eight issues per year). In addition to the printed issues, the full content is available in electronic format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信