Recommendations for Social Work Researchers and Journal Editors on the Use of Generative AI and Large Language Models

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Bryan G. Victor, R. Sokol, Lauri Goldkind, Brian Perron
{"title":"Recommendations for Social Work Researchers and Journal Editors on the Use of Generative AI and Large Language Models","authors":"Bryan G. Victor, R. Sokol, Lauri Goldkind, Brian Perron","doi":"10.1086/726021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) are poised to significantly impact social work research. These technologies can produce high-quality written materials and support qualitative and quantitative data analysis with simple, plain-language prompts from users. However, they also introduce challenges, such as potential bias, data privacy concerns, and generation of misinformation. In this paper, we use a disruptive–disrupting framework to discuss the dual nature of generative AI and LLMs and offer recommendations for social work researchers and journal editors that include guidance around data collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination. Researchers must use great caution when deploying generative AI technologies, meticulously examining, verifying, and taking accountability for the text and analyses produced by these instruments. Likewise, journal editors will need to implement quality control procedures and ethical standards to guide and evaluate the use of these technologies in social work research. We consider the recommendations offered here as a point of departure for disciplinary conversations about the role of generative AI and LLMs in social work research.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) are poised to significantly impact social work research. These technologies can produce high-quality written materials and support qualitative and quantitative data analysis with simple, plain-language prompts from users. However, they also introduce challenges, such as potential bias, data privacy concerns, and generation of misinformation. In this paper, we use a disruptive–disrupting framework to discuss the dual nature of generative AI and LLMs and offer recommendations for social work researchers and journal editors that include guidance around data collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination. Researchers must use great caution when deploying generative AI technologies, meticulously examining, verifying, and taking accountability for the text and analyses produced by these instruments. Likewise, journal editors will need to implement quality control procedures and ethical standards to guide and evaluate the use of these technologies in social work research. We consider the recommendations offered here as a point of departure for disciplinary conversations about the role of generative AI and LLMs in social work research.
对社会工作研究人员和期刊编辑关于使用生成人工智能和大型语言模型的建议
生成式人工智能(AI)和大型语言模型(llm)将对社会工作研究产生重大影响。这些技术可以产生高质量的书面材料,并支持定性和定量数据分析,用户可以使用简单、简单的语言提示。然而,它们也带来了挑战,例如潜在的偏见、数据隐私问题和错误信息的产生。在本文中,我们使用破坏性-破坏性框架来讨论生成式人工智能和法学硕士的双重性质,并为社会工作研究人员和期刊编辑提供建议,包括关于数据收集、分析、解释和传播的指导。研究人员在部署生成式人工智能技术时必须非常谨慎,仔细检查、验证并对这些工具产生的文本和分析负责。同样,期刊编辑需要实施质量控制程序和道德标准,以指导和评估这些技术在社会工作研究中的使用。我们认为这里提供的建议是关于生成人工智能和法学硕士在社会工作研究中的作用的学科对话的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信