Why are Android Apps Removed From Google Play? A Large-Scale Empirical Study

Haoyu Wang, Hao Li, Li Li, Yao Guo, Guoai Xu
{"title":"Why are Android Apps Removed From Google Play? A Large-Scale Empirical Study","authors":"Haoyu Wang, Hao Li, Li Li, Yao Guo, Guoai Xu","doi":"10.1145/3196398.3196412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To ensure the quality and trustworthiness of the apps within its app market (i.e., Google Play), Google has released a series of policies to regulate app developers. As a result, policy-violating apps (e.g., malware, low-quality apps, etc.) have been removed by Google Play periodically. In reality, we have found that the number of removed apps are actually much more than what we have expected, as almost half of all the apps have been removed or replaced from Google Play during a two year period from 2015 to 2017. However, despite the significant number of removed apps, there are almost no study on the characterization of these removed apps. To this end, this paper takes the first step to understand why Android apps are removed from Google Play, aiming at observing promising insights for both market maintainers and app developers towards building a better app ecosystem. By leveraging two app sets crawled from Google Play in 2015 (over 1.5 million) and 2017 (over 2.1 million), we have identified a set of over 790K removed apps, which are then thoroughly investigated in various aspects. The experimental results have revealed various interesting findings, as well as insights for future research directions.","PeriodicalId":6639,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"4 1","pages":"231-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3196398.3196412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

To ensure the quality and trustworthiness of the apps within its app market (i.e., Google Play), Google has released a series of policies to regulate app developers. As a result, policy-violating apps (e.g., malware, low-quality apps, etc.) have been removed by Google Play periodically. In reality, we have found that the number of removed apps are actually much more than what we have expected, as almost half of all the apps have been removed or replaced from Google Play during a two year period from 2015 to 2017. However, despite the significant number of removed apps, there are almost no study on the characterization of these removed apps. To this end, this paper takes the first step to understand why Android apps are removed from Google Play, aiming at observing promising insights for both market maintainers and app developers towards building a better app ecosystem. By leveraging two app sets crawled from Google Play in 2015 (over 1.5 million) and 2017 (over 2.1 million), we have identified a set of over 790K removed apps, which are then thoroughly investigated in various aspects. The experimental results have revealed various interesting findings, as well as insights for future research directions.
Android应用为何从Google Play下架?大规模实证研究
为了确保其应用市场(即Google Play)中应用的质量和可信度,谷歌发布了一系列政策来规范应用开发者。因此,违反政策的应用程序(例如,恶意软件,低质量的应用程序等)已被Google Play定期删除。实际上,我们发现被下架的应用数量实际上比我们预期的要多,因为在2015年至2017年的两年间,几乎一半的应用已经被从Google Play下架或替换。然而,尽管有大量的应用被下架,但几乎没有关于这些被下架应用特征的研究。为此,本文首先阐述了Android应用被Google Play移除的原因,旨在为市场维护者和应用开发者构建更好的应用生态系统提供有前途的见解。通过利用2015年(超过150万)和2017年(超过210万)从Google Play抓取的两组应用程序,我们确定了一组超过79万的被删除应用程序,然后从各个方面对其进行彻底调查。实验结果揭示了各种有趣的发现,以及对未来研究方向的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信