The effect of different implant-abutment connection on screw joint stability.

K. Michalakis, P. Calvani, S. Muftu, A. Pissiotis, H. Hirayama
{"title":"The effect of different implant-abutment connection on screw joint stability.","authors":"K. Michalakis, P. Calvani, S. Muftu, A. Pissiotis, H. Hirayama","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-d-11-00032.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dental implants with an internal connection have been designed in order to establish a better stress distribution when lateral external forces act on the prosthesis and minimize the forces transmitted to the fastening screw. In the present study, ten externally and ten internally hexed implants were tested with a compressive force applied with an Instron Universal machine. Four cycles of loading-unloading were applied to each specimen, in order to achieve displacements of 0.5, 1, 2 and 2.5 mm. The mean loads for the first cycle were 256.70 N for the external connection and 256 N for the internal connection implants. The independent t test did not reveal any significant differences among the two tested groups (P=.780). For the second cycle, the mean loads needed for a displacement of 1mm were 818.19 N and 780.20 N, for the external connection and the internal connection implants respectively. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the two tested groups (P<.001). In the third cycle, the mean load values for a 2mm displacement were 1394.10 N and 1225.00 N. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the two tested groups (P<.001). The mean loads for the fourth cycle were 1488.00 N for the external connection and 1029.00 N for the internal connection implants. These loads were required for a displacement of 2.5mm. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the two tested groups (P<.001). The results of this in vitro study suggest that the internal connection design of the examined implant system could not prevent screw loosening during overloading. No implant or prosthesis failure was noticed in either group.","PeriodicalId":77634,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-11-00032.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Dental implants with an internal connection have been designed in order to establish a better stress distribution when lateral external forces act on the prosthesis and minimize the forces transmitted to the fastening screw. In the present study, ten externally and ten internally hexed implants were tested with a compressive force applied with an Instron Universal machine. Four cycles of loading-unloading were applied to each specimen, in order to achieve displacements of 0.5, 1, 2 and 2.5 mm. The mean loads for the first cycle were 256.70 N for the external connection and 256 N for the internal connection implants. The independent t test did not reveal any significant differences among the two tested groups (P=.780). For the second cycle, the mean loads needed for a displacement of 1mm were 818.19 N and 780.20 N, for the external connection and the internal connection implants respectively. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the two tested groups (P<.001). In the third cycle, the mean load values for a 2mm displacement were 1394.10 N and 1225.00 N. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the two tested groups (P<.001). The mean loads for the fourth cycle were 1488.00 N for the external connection and 1029.00 N for the internal connection implants. These loads were required for a displacement of 2.5mm. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the two tested groups (P<.001). The results of this in vitro study suggest that the internal connection design of the examined implant system could not prevent screw loosening during overloading. No implant or prosthesis failure was noticed in either group.
种植体-基台不同连接方式对螺钉连接稳定性的影响。
内连接种植体的设计目的是为了在侧向外力作用于种植体时,建立较好的应力分布,并使传递给固定螺钉的力最小。在本研究中,使用Instron万能机器对10个外六角和10个内六角植入物进行了压缩力测试。对每个试件进行4次循环加载-卸载,以实现0.5、1、2和2.5 mm的位移。第一个周期的平均载荷为256.70 N外连接和256 N内连接种植体。独立t检验未显示两组间有显著差异(P= 0.780)。对于第二个周期,外连接和内连接种植体位移1mm所需的平均载荷分别为818.19 N和780.20 N。经独立t检验,两组间差异有统计学意义(P< 0.001)。在第三个周期中,2mm位移的平均载荷值分别为1394.10 N和1225.00 N,独立t检验显示两组间差异有统计学意义(P< 0.001)。第四个周期的平均载荷为1488.00 N外连接和1029.00 N内连接种植体。位移为2.5mm时需要这些载荷。经独立t检验,两组间差异有统计学意义(P< 0.001)。本体外研究结果表明,所检查的种植体系统的内部连接设计不能防止超载时螺钉松动。两组均未见种植体或假体失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书