Old Forms, New Functions: Quadriliteral Root Patterns as Sources of Verbal Meaning

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Vera Agranovsky
{"title":"Old Forms, New Functions: Quadriliteral Root Patterns as Sources of Verbal Meaning","authors":"Vera Agranovsky","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper describes a process whereby morphological patterns that, in premodern Hebrew, were not associated with a particular semantic profile, or were only partly associated with such a profile, developed a particular meaning in Modern Hebrew. This process is exemplified by certain types of quadriliteral roots formed in the Hebrew verbal system.Of eight quadriliteral root patterns productive in Modern Hebrew, three developed meanings of their own: the pilpel pattern, which expresses a series of short, atomic events; the piʿlel pattern, which describes a reduced or attenuated event, and the šifʿel pattern, which conveys a restitutive or repetitive meaning, or increase on scale. The pilpel pattern became associated with its meaning already in Mishnaic Hebrew, and in Modern Hebrew the association became nearly exclusive, whereas the other two patterns developed their typical meanings only in Modern Hebrew itself.This research shows that a quadriliteral root-pattern develops a particular semantic profile only if it utilizes the derivational mechanism of direct rootexpansion in the verbal system without the mediation of another lexical item. Moreover, individual verbs coined in the pattern tend to be associated with that meaning if they are derived in this manner. Pilpel verbs can convey the pattern's typical meaning even if they are derived by onomatopoeia or with the mediation of noun, but only if the parent nominal form is biliteral.The research also traced the development of patterns' semantic profiles over time. It was found that this development was conspicuously influenced by the substrate and contact languages of Modern Hebrew, and that factors of reanalysis and analogy were also at play.","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"311 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This paper describes a process whereby morphological patterns that, in premodern Hebrew, were not associated with a particular semantic profile, or were only partly associated with such a profile, developed a particular meaning in Modern Hebrew. This process is exemplified by certain types of quadriliteral roots formed in the Hebrew verbal system.Of eight quadriliteral root patterns productive in Modern Hebrew, three developed meanings of their own: the pilpel pattern, which expresses a series of short, atomic events; the piʿlel pattern, which describes a reduced or attenuated event, and the šifʿel pattern, which conveys a restitutive or repetitive meaning, or increase on scale. The pilpel pattern became associated with its meaning already in Mishnaic Hebrew, and in Modern Hebrew the association became nearly exclusive, whereas the other two patterns developed their typical meanings only in Modern Hebrew itself.This research shows that a quadriliteral root-pattern develops a particular semantic profile only if it utilizes the derivational mechanism of direct rootexpansion in the verbal system without the mediation of another lexical item. Moreover, individual verbs coined in the pattern tend to be associated with that meaning if they are derived in this manner. Pilpel verbs can convey the pattern's typical meaning even if they are derived by onomatopoeia or with the mediation of noun, but only if the parent nominal form is biliteral.The research also traced the development of patterns' semantic profiles over time. It was found that this development was conspicuously influenced by the substrate and contact languages of Modern Hebrew, and that factors of reanalysis and analogy were also at play.
旧形式,新功能:作为言语意义来源的四边形词根模式
摘要:本文描述了一个过程,即形态模式,在前现代希伯来语中,没有与特定的语义轮廓相关联,或者只是部分地与这种轮廓相关联,在现代希伯来语中发展出特定的意义。这一过程以希伯来语语言系统中形成的某些类型的四边形根为例。在现代希伯来语中产生的八个四边形根模式中,有三个发展出了自己的含义:pilpel模式,表达了一系列简短的原子事件;pi - al模式,描述了一个减少或减弱的事件,šif - al模式,表达了一个恢复或重复的意思,或在规模上增加。在密西拿希伯来语中,pilpel模式已经与它的含义联系在一起,在现代希伯来语中,这种联系几乎是排他的,而其他两种模式只有在现代希伯来语中才发展出它们的典型含义。本研究表明,一个四边形词根模式只有在不使用其他词汇项的情况下,利用词根直接扩展的衍生机制才能形成特定的语义轮廓。此外,在这种模式中创造的单个动词如果以这种方式衍生出来,往往会与该意思相关联。即使是由拟声词衍生或以名词为中介的小动词,也能传达模式的典型意义,但前提是母名词形式是双重的。该研究还追踪了模式语义轮廓随时间的发展。研究发现,这种发展明显受到现代希伯来语的基础语言和接触语言的影响,再分析和类比的因素也在起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hebrew Studies
Hebrew Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信