Relaciones internacionales

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
Manuel Alcántara
{"title":"Relaciones internacionales","authors":"Manuel Alcántara","doi":"10.14201/0aq0251_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of 1940 and the foundation of the Interamerican Indigenous Institute (INI); c) The neo-liberal period that lived along with the internationalization of indigenous’ identity and that began in 1982 with the of fi cial adoption of neoliberalism as the main policy of Mexico up to the birth of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) in 1994. Hence, once “Genealogy” is stated we will jump to the contemporary period during which Mexico implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with USA and Canada that revisited the article 27 of Mexican constitution for which indigenous landholdings had to be protected from sale and privatization. Here the analysis will be conducted on existing literature through a qualitative analysis of the data extrapolated via “Discourse Theory”. At this point, we will compare counter-hegemonic and hegemonic discourses of Subcomandante Marcos and President Salinas de Gortari. Hence, it will be clear how the two opponents, via the concepts of “democracy” and “modernization”, have tried to give a new meaning to the signi fi er “indigenous” and how the discursive fi ght of EZLN has tried to reach as main goal the rebuilding of the word “indigenous”, making it enter in the San Andrés Accords of 1996 as a term that had to include all those native subjects who had right to have rights.","PeriodicalId":37491,"journal":{"name":"Memoria e Ricerca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoria e Ricerca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/0aq0251_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

of 1940 and the foundation of the Interamerican Indigenous Institute (INI); c) The neo-liberal period that lived along with the internationalization of indigenous’ identity and that began in 1982 with the of fi cial adoption of neoliberalism as the main policy of Mexico up to the birth of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) in 1994. Hence, once “Genealogy” is stated we will jump to the contemporary period during which Mexico implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with USA and Canada that revisited the article 27 of Mexican constitution for which indigenous landholdings had to be protected from sale and privatization. Here the analysis will be conducted on existing literature through a qualitative analysis of the data extrapolated via “Discourse Theory”. At this point, we will compare counter-hegemonic and hegemonic discourses of Subcomandante Marcos and President Salinas de Gortari. Hence, it will be clear how the two opponents, via the concepts of “democracy” and “modernization”, have tried to give a new meaning to the signi fi er “indigenous” and how the discursive fi ght of EZLN has tried to reach as main goal the rebuilding of the word “indigenous”, making it enter in the San Andrés Accords of 1996 as a term that had to include all those native subjects who had right to have rights.
国际关系
1940年成立美洲土著研究所;c)新自由主义时期,伴随着土著身份的国际化,始于1982年,新自由主义被正式采纳为墨西哥的主要政策,直到1994年萨帕塔民族解放军(EZLN)的诞生。因此,一旦“家谱”被陈述,我们将跳转到当代,在此期间,墨西哥与美国和加拿大实施了北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA),重新审视了墨西哥宪法第27条,其中土著土地所有权必须受到保护,不得出售和私有化。在这里,我们将通过对“话语理论”外推的数据进行定性分析,对现有文献进行分析。在这一点上,我们将比较副指挥官马科斯和总统萨利纳斯·德戈塔里的反霸权和霸权话语。因此,显而易见的是,这两个对手如何借由“民主”与“现代化”的概念,试图赋予“原住民”一词新的意义,而“民族解放军”的话语斗争如何试图达到重建“原住民”一词的主要目标,使其进入1996年的《圣安德鲁萨梅斯协定》,成为一个必须包括所有有权拥有权利的原住民主体的术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memoria e Ricerca
Memoria e Ricerca Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Memoria e Ricerca is a four-monthly peer-reviewed academic journal which was established in 1993, promoted by the Casa Oriani Foundation of Ravenna, Italy. Its main focus is comparative and interdisciplinary research in the laboratory of the historian of Late Modern and Contemporary Age. Each issue includes a monographic section collecting original studies from cutting edge historical research. The journal is engaged in the study of the spatial and visual dimension of historical processes, with a special emphasis on the European and Mediterranean environment, and aims at matching history and social sciences sensibilities and approaches. Its open sections («Regioni/Ragioni della storia», «Intersezioni» e «Discussioni») offer a wide view on the communication systems and languages which contribute to the building of public cultural memory according to a European and international perspective, the study of the Italian case can also benefit from.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信