Exploring the relationship between transphobia and homophobia and other demographic factors among practicing and future primary school teachers

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ana M. Amigo-Ventureira, M. Durán, R. DePalma
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between transphobia and homophobia and other demographic factors among practicing and future primary school teachers","authors":"Ana M. Amigo-Ventureira, M. Durán, R. DePalma","doi":"10.1177/00345237231163048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on an existing measure of homophobia, we developed an instrument to measure both transphobia and homophobia, as well as their relationship with other demographic variables that included attributed sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, and political affinity. Research was designed to establish the relationship between homophobia and transphobia, by comparing the results of a validated Homophobia Test with a Transphobia Test that has been designed by adapting the same items; and to explore the relationship between homophobia/transphobia and other socio-demographic variables, specifically including gender, geographic origin, sexual orientation, political ideology, and religious conviction). Our research with 1,133 trainee and 182 practicing teachers demonstrated the reliability of our instrument, suggesting a correspondence between the two types of prejudice. Our results also found that these two prejudices followed similar trends with respect to other variables: respondents who identified as men showed higher levels of both homophobia and transphobia, as did those who professed religious conviction and were affiliated with the right wing of the political spectrum. We found that people who identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual were less homophobic and transphobic that those who identified as heterosexual. Based on these data, we hypothesize that the two types of prejudice explored here derive from a common factor, the broader social construct of cisgenderism, so that any deviation from the heterosexual matrix, whether in terms of gender identity, gender presentation, or sexual orientation, results in social stigma. The professionals included in our sample are entrusted with well-being of all children, and are responsible for teaching about human diversity as part of the curriculum. Our findings will help us understand how teachers might respond to children who transgress, or are perceived to transgress, cisgendered norms, and to design more effective teacher training concerning sex and gender diversity.","PeriodicalId":45813,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231163048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on an existing measure of homophobia, we developed an instrument to measure both transphobia and homophobia, as well as their relationship with other demographic variables that included attributed sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, and political affinity. Research was designed to establish the relationship between homophobia and transphobia, by comparing the results of a validated Homophobia Test with a Transphobia Test that has been designed by adapting the same items; and to explore the relationship between homophobia/transphobia and other socio-demographic variables, specifically including gender, geographic origin, sexual orientation, political ideology, and religious conviction). Our research with 1,133 trainee and 182 practicing teachers demonstrated the reliability of our instrument, suggesting a correspondence between the two types of prejudice. Our results also found that these two prejudices followed similar trends with respect to other variables: respondents who identified as men showed higher levels of both homophobia and transphobia, as did those who professed religious conviction and were affiliated with the right wing of the political spectrum. We found that people who identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual were less homophobic and transphobic that those who identified as heterosexual. Based on these data, we hypothesize that the two types of prejudice explored here derive from a common factor, the broader social construct of cisgenderism, so that any deviation from the heterosexual matrix, whether in terms of gender identity, gender presentation, or sexual orientation, results in social stigma. The professionals included in our sample are entrusted with well-being of all children, and are responsible for teaching about human diversity as part of the curriculum. Our findings will help us understand how teachers might respond to children who transgress, or are perceived to transgress, cisgendered norms, and to design more effective teacher training concerning sex and gender diversity.
探讨在职和未来小学教师中跨性别恐惧症和同性恋恐惧症与其他人口统计学因素的关系
基于现有的同性恋恐惧症测量,我们开发了一种工具来测量变性恐惧症和同性恋恐惧症,以及它们与其他人口变量的关系,包括归因于性别、性别认同、性取向、宗教信仰和政治亲和力。本研究旨在通过比较经过验证的同性恋恐惧症测试结果与采用相同项目设计的变性恐惧症测试结果,建立同性恋恐惧症和变性恐惧症之间的关系;并探讨同性恋恐惧症/变性恐惧症与其他社会人口变量(特别是性别、地理来源、性取向、政治意识形态和宗教信仰)之间的关系。我们对1133名实习教师和182名在职教师的研究证明了我们的工具的可靠性,表明两种偏见之间存在对应关系。我们的研究结果还发现,这两种偏见在其他变量方面也有类似的趋势:男性受访者对同性恋和变性人的恐惧程度更高,那些自称有宗教信仰并隶属于右翼政治派别的人也是如此。我们发现,与异性恋者相比,男同性恋、女同性恋或双性恋者对同性恋和跨性别者的恐惧程度较低。基于这些数据,我们假设这里探讨的两种偏见来自于一个共同的因素,即更广泛的顺性别主义社会结构,因此任何偏离异性恋矩阵的行为,无论是在性别认同、性别表现还是性取向方面,都会导致社会污名化。我们样本中的专业人员被委托为所有儿童的福祉,并负责将人类多样性作为课程的一部分进行教学。我们的研究结果将帮助我们了解教师如何应对违反或被认为违反了顺性别规范的儿童,并设计更有效的关于性别和性别多样性的教师培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Education
Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Research in Education has an established focus on the sociology and psychology of education and gives increased emphasis to current practical issues of direct interest to those in the teaching profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信