Rating assessment of scientific and pedagogical workers: theoretical and methodical aspects within a market approach

O. Dzoba
{"title":"Rating assessment of scientific and pedagogical workers: theoretical and methodical aspects within a market approach","authors":"O. Dzoba","doi":"10.31471/2409-0948-2019-1(19)-84-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates the theoretical and methodological principles of scientific and pedagogical workers rating assessment in higher educational institutions (HEI). According to the results of broad literature analysis, rating systems formation peculiarities of scientific and pedagogical university workers were determined. Further development of approaches to specification and detailing of the essence, functions, purposes and tasks of rating assessment, formation of principles, requirements and criteria, justification and rating models selection, harmonization of theoretical concepts with the practice of applying procedures for rating assessment in the HEI is substantiated. \nResearch novelty is to elaborate on the essence and functions of scientific and pedagogical workers rating assessment system being considered as a multidimensional information system, which in turn is the subsystem of a more general management system. Scientific and pedagogical workers rating assessment system  involves continuous observation, measurement and controlled object conditions evaluation, operational management decisions adoption, ensures the implementation, verification and review of management objectives, promotes educational and scientific standardization processes, provides ongoing regulation and forecasts further development. Rating assessment system is inextricably linked with professional activities monitoring of scientific and pedagogical workers in higher educational institutions and performs similar functions, such as informational, management, systematic, predictive, activating, analytical, qualimetric, corrective, diagnostic and formative ones. \nAn important element of the scientific novelty studies is the feasibility justification of using a market approach based on  marketing, social and ethical concepts marketing in formulating the goals, objectives and rating systems constructing principles for scientific and pedagogical workers. \nIt is established that the most relevant principles in scientific and pedagogical workers rating systems formation are the principles of integrity with the general management system, dynamism and adaptability, orientation towards the needs of educational and scientific services consumers. \nProspects for further research are related to the theoretical foundations development and methodology for building marketing complexes of educational and scientific services aimed at maximizing the consumers and society needs, which will be attained through more efficient management of human resource potential based on the use of rating models.","PeriodicalId":59694,"journal":{"name":"石油与天然气化工","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"石油与天然气化工","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31471/2409-0948-2019-1(19)-84-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article investigates the theoretical and methodological principles of scientific and pedagogical workers rating assessment in higher educational institutions (HEI). According to the results of broad literature analysis, rating systems formation peculiarities of scientific and pedagogical university workers were determined. Further development of approaches to specification and detailing of the essence, functions, purposes and tasks of rating assessment, formation of principles, requirements and criteria, justification and rating models selection, harmonization of theoretical concepts with the practice of applying procedures for rating assessment in the HEI is substantiated. Research novelty is to elaborate on the essence and functions of scientific and pedagogical workers rating assessment system being considered as a multidimensional information system, which in turn is the subsystem of a more general management system. Scientific and pedagogical workers rating assessment system  involves continuous observation, measurement and controlled object conditions evaluation, operational management decisions adoption, ensures the implementation, verification and review of management objectives, promotes educational and scientific standardization processes, provides ongoing regulation and forecasts further development. Rating assessment system is inextricably linked with professional activities monitoring of scientific and pedagogical workers in higher educational institutions and performs similar functions, such as informational, management, systematic, predictive, activating, analytical, qualimetric, corrective, diagnostic and formative ones. An important element of the scientific novelty studies is the feasibility justification of using a market approach based on  marketing, social and ethical concepts marketing in formulating the goals, objectives and rating systems constructing principles for scientific and pedagogical workers. It is established that the most relevant principles in scientific and pedagogical workers rating systems formation are the principles of integrity with the general management system, dynamism and adaptability, orientation towards the needs of educational and scientific services consumers. Prospects for further research are related to the theoretical foundations development and methodology for building marketing complexes of educational and scientific services aimed at maximizing the consumers and society needs, which will be attained through more efficient management of human resource potential based on the use of rating models.
科学和教育工作者的评级评估:市场方法中的理论和方法方面
本文探讨了高等学校科学工作者和教育工作者等级评定的理论和方法原则。根据广泛的文献分析结果,确定了高校科教工作者等级制度的形成特点。进一步发展方法,以规范和详细说明评级评估的本质、功能、目的和任务,原则、要求和标准的形成,理由和评级模型的选择,理论概念与高等教育机构应用评级评估程序的实践相协调。研究的新颖之处在于阐述科研工作者等级评定系统作为一个多维信息系统的本质和功能,而这个多维信息系统又是一个更一般的管理系统的子系统。科教工作者等级评定制度涉及持续观察、测量和受控对象条件的评价,业务管理决策的通过,确保管理目标的实施、验证和审查,促进教育和科学标准化进程,提供持续的调节和预测进一步的发展。等级考核制度与高校科教工作者的专业活动监测有着千丝万缕的联系,具有信息性、管理性、系统性、预见性、启动性、分析性、定性性、纠正性、诊断性和形成性等功能。科学新颖性研究的一个重要内容是在科学工作者和教育工作者制定目标、目标和评价体系、构建原则时,运用基于市场营销、社会和伦理概念的市场方法的可行性论证。确立了科学和教育工作者等级制度形成中最相关的原则是与一般管理制度的完整性、动态性和适应性、面向教育和科学服务消费者需求的原则。进一步研究的前景与建立旨在最大限度地满足消费者和社会需求的教育和科学服务营销综合体的理论基础、发展和方法有关,这将通过基于使用评级模型更有效地管理人力资源潜力来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5096
期刊介绍: Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas is a scientific and technical journal supervised by the Southwest Oil and Gas Field Branch of PetroChina Company Limited and sponsored by the Natural Gas Research Institute of the company. The journal focuses on reporting scientific research results, academic papers, standards and technical innovations in the field of chemical and chemical industry of oil and gas industry, and is a comprehensive scientific and technical journal covering oil and gas treatment, processing and its utilisation technologies. It is a comprehensive scientific and technical journal covering oil and gas treatment, processing and utilisation technologies. The columns of the journal include oil and gas treatment, processing and utilisation, new energy and materials, oil and gas field development, analysis, measurement and standardisation, safety and environmental protection, and so on. The aim of the journal is ‘based on Southwest China, facing the whole country and going towards the world’, aiming to serve the innovation of oil and gas development, production and processing technology, with special focus on sour natural gas development, sulfur-containing crude oil processing technology, as well as natural gas purification and processing, oil and gas field corrosion protection, natural gas exploration and development of chemistry and other areas of research and development results. In terms of influence, Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas is included in many domestic and international databases, including Chinese Core Journals, CSCD Source Journals, ‘Classified Catalogue of High Quality Scientific and Technical Journals in Oil and Gas Industry’, ‘World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report of Scientific and Technical Journals’, RCCSE China Core Academic Journals, National Top 100 Journals in Petroleum and Chemical Industry, China Journal Full Text Database, Tsinghua Tongfang CD-ROM Edition and Wanfang Database, China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database. Internationally, the journal is included in the American Chemical Abstracts (CA), JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency) database, Ullrich International Periodicals Guide (USA), and EBSCO (USA) full text database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信