Framing the Libyan uprising: a comparison between Al Jazeera Arabic’s and BBC Arabic’s coverage of the 2011 uprising and ensuing NATO intervention

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Sumaya Alnahed
{"title":"Framing the Libyan uprising: a comparison between Al Jazeera Arabic’s and BBC Arabic’s coverage of the 2011 uprising and ensuing NATO intervention","authors":"Sumaya Alnahed","doi":"10.1386/JAMMR.9.1.119_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares Al Jazeera Arabic’s and BBC Arabic’s news coverage of the 2011 Libyan uprising and the ensuing NATO intervention in the country. Through this comparative analysis, the article evaluates the impact of these two channels’ political contexts on their coverage, especially considering that these two channels are part of broader transnational news networks that are based in countries that were active participants in the NATO intervention in Libya. The sample involves a period of roughly four weeks of coverage, and considers aspects such as the birth of the February 17 movement in Libya, the development of the opposition, the beginning and end of the 2011 NATO mission and the death of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The sample was analysed by means of a framing analysis, whereby framing refers to the way a news story is packaged, and is an especially appropriate method when considering the influence of political power on coverage. The comparative analysis ultimately found that both channels’ coverage was primarily affected by their political contexts, and aligned with national and foreign policy interests of their home countries. This alignment was evident through the coverage that was supportive of the opposition and its advances, and the intervention and its gains. However, BBC Arabic’s coverage was more balanced, especially with regard to the progression of the opposition on the ground, as it did not play up opposition gains or gloss over opposition losses, as Al Jazeera Arabic tended to do. BBC Arabic also displayed a more analytical stance when covering the death of the former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The language used by Al Jazeera Arabic was also far more emotive and sensationalistic than that of BBC Arabic, which displayed a far more tempered stance when covering the Libyan uprising. Thus, this article also considers how each of these channels used the Arabic language when reporting, and how these stylistic differences might have affected their coverage.","PeriodicalId":36098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","volume":"128 1","pages":"119-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JAMMR.9.1.119_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article compares Al Jazeera Arabic’s and BBC Arabic’s news coverage of the 2011 Libyan uprising and the ensuing NATO intervention in the country. Through this comparative analysis, the article evaluates the impact of these two channels’ political contexts on their coverage, especially considering that these two channels are part of broader transnational news networks that are based in countries that were active participants in the NATO intervention in Libya. The sample involves a period of roughly four weeks of coverage, and considers aspects such as the birth of the February 17 movement in Libya, the development of the opposition, the beginning and end of the 2011 NATO mission and the death of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The sample was analysed by means of a framing analysis, whereby framing refers to the way a news story is packaged, and is an especially appropriate method when considering the influence of political power on coverage. The comparative analysis ultimately found that both channels’ coverage was primarily affected by their political contexts, and aligned with national and foreign policy interests of their home countries. This alignment was evident through the coverage that was supportive of the opposition and its advances, and the intervention and its gains. However, BBC Arabic’s coverage was more balanced, especially with regard to the progression of the opposition on the ground, as it did not play up opposition gains or gloss over opposition losses, as Al Jazeera Arabic tended to do. BBC Arabic also displayed a more analytical stance when covering the death of the former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The language used by Al Jazeera Arabic was also far more emotive and sensationalistic than that of BBC Arabic, which displayed a far more tempered stance when covering the Libyan uprising. Thus, this article also considers how each of these channels used the Arabic language when reporting, and how these stylistic differences might have affected their coverage.
构建利比亚起义:半岛电视台阿拉伯语和BBC阿拉伯语对2011年起义和随后的北约干预的报道的比较
这篇文章比较了半岛电视台阿拉伯语和BBC阿拉伯语对2011年利比亚起义和随后北约对该国的干预的新闻报道。通过这种比较分析,本文评估了这两个渠道的政治背景对其报道的影响,特别是考虑到这两个渠道是更广泛的跨国新闻网络的一部分,这些新闻网络的总部设在积极参与北约对利比亚干预的国家。该样本涵盖了大约四周的报道,并考虑了利比亚2月17日运动的诞生、反对派的发展、2011年北约任务的开始和结束以及利比亚前领导人穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲的死亡等方面。该样本是通过框架分析来分析的,其中框架是指新闻故事的包装方式,在考虑政治权力对报道的影响时,这是一个特别合适的方法。对比分析最终发现,两个渠道的报道主要受其政治背景的影响,并与本国的国家和外交政策利益相一致。通过支持反对派及其进展,以及干预及其收益的报道,这种一致性是显而易见的。然而,BBC阿拉伯语的报道更加平衡,特别是关于反对派在地面上的进展,因为它没有夸大反对派的得失,也没有掩盖反对派的损失,而半岛电视台阿拉伯语则倾向于这样做。在报道利比亚前领导人穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲之死时,BBC阿拉伯语频道也表现出了更为分析性的立场。半岛电视台阿拉伯语频道使用的语言也比BBC阿拉伯语频道更加情绪化和煽情,BBC阿拉伯语频道在报道利比亚起义时表现出的姿态要温和得多。因此,本文还考虑了这些频道在报道时如何使用阿拉伯语,以及这些风格差异可能如何影响它们的报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信