Technical Trick: T-Bar External Fixator for Definitive Management of Periarticular and Metadiaphyseal Tibial Fractures

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Samuel J Mease, Hallie R. Bradley, D. R. Thota, A. Starr, Drew T. Sanders
{"title":"Technical Trick: T-Bar External Fixator for Definitive Management of Periarticular and Metadiaphyseal Tibial Fractures","authors":"Samuel J Mease, Hallie R. Bradley, D. R. Thota, A. Starr, Drew T. Sanders","doi":"10.1097/BTO.0000000000000594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Tibia fractures with soft tissue compromise present are challenging to manage. For fractures with significant swelling or open injury not amenable to internal stabilization, external fixators provide sufficient stability for bony healing. Ring fixators and hybrid constructs provide adequate stability for healing but are costly, and challenging to apply and maintain. We present the “T-bar” external fixator, a novel construct that can be maintained until bony union and allows for range of motion of adjacent joints. We also report the demographics, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of 34 patients treated definitively with this construct. Materials and Methods: The T-bar external fixator uses standard pins and bars in a novel arrangement. It can be applied for Arbeitsgemeinshaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association-type 41/42/43 type injuries, with or without supplemental fixation for intra-articular patterns. Results: Between 2008 and 2015, 34 patients were treated for tibia fracture with T-bar external fixation, with intention to treat in a definitive manner. Twenty-nine were male, and average age was 44.3 years. Thirty-one sustained high energy mechanisms of injury. Twenty were Gustilo-type 2 or 3 fractures. Of 14 closed fractures, 12 were Tscherne-type 2 or 3. Conclusions: The T-bar external fixator offers an alternative to ring and hybrid external fixator constructs in treatment of tibia fractures with significant soft tissue compromise. Of 28 patients with complete follow up, only 1 case of osteomyelitis was reported. All patients were managed without amputation. Three required revision for nonunion, all Arbeitsgemeinshaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association-type 43.","PeriodicalId":45336,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":"1 1","pages":"5 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BTO.0000000000000594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Tibia fractures with soft tissue compromise present are challenging to manage. For fractures with significant swelling or open injury not amenable to internal stabilization, external fixators provide sufficient stability for bony healing. Ring fixators and hybrid constructs provide adequate stability for healing but are costly, and challenging to apply and maintain. We present the “T-bar” external fixator, a novel construct that can be maintained until bony union and allows for range of motion of adjacent joints. We also report the demographics, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of 34 patients treated definitively with this construct. Materials and Methods: The T-bar external fixator uses standard pins and bars in a novel arrangement. It can be applied for Arbeitsgemeinshaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association-type 41/42/43 type injuries, with or without supplemental fixation for intra-articular patterns. Results: Between 2008 and 2015, 34 patients were treated for tibia fracture with T-bar external fixation, with intention to treat in a definitive manner. Twenty-nine were male, and average age was 44.3 years. Thirty-one sustained high energy mechanisms of injury. Twenty were Gustilo-type 2 or 3 fractures. Of 14 closed fractures, 12 were Tscherne-type 2 or 3. Conclusions: The T-bar external fixator offers an alternative to ring and hybrid external fixator constructs in treatment of tibia fractures with significant soft tissue compromise. Of 28 patients with complete follow up, only 1 case of osteomyelitis was reported. All patients were managed without amputation. Three required revision for nonunion, all Arbeitsgemeinshaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association-type 43.
技术诀窍:t -棒外固定架用于胫骨关节周和干骺端骨折的最终治疗
目的:胫骨骨折伴软组织损伤,治疗难度大。对于有明显肿胀或开放性损伤的骨折不能进行内固定,外固定架可为骨愈合提供足够的稳定性。环形固定器和混合结构提供了足够的愈合稳定性,但价格昂贵,并且具有挑战性的应用和维护。我们提出了“t -棒”外固定架,这是一种新颖的结构,可以维持到骨愈合,并允许相邻关节的活动范围。我们还报告了34例明确采用这种结构治疗的患者的人口统计学、临床和放射学结果。材料和方法:t型棒外固定架采用标准的针和棒在一个新的安排。它可用于骨合成骨折/骨科创伤协会型41/42/43型损伤的Arbeitsgemeinshaft,有或没有关节内模式的补充固定。结果:2008年至2015年间,34例患者采用t -棒外固定治疗胫骨骨折,目的是明确治疗。男性29人,平均年龄44.3岁。31例持续高能量损伤机制。gustillo型2、3型骨折20例。闭合骨折14例,tscherne 2型或3型骨折12例。结论:t -棒式外固定架是环式外固定架和混合式外固定架的一种替代方案,可用于治疗伴有明显软组织损伤的胫骨骨折。随访28例,仅1例出现骨髓炎。所有患者均未截肢。3例骨不连需要翻修,全部为骨合成骨折/骨科创伤协会43型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The purpose of Techniques in Orthopaedics is to provide information on the latest orthopaedic procedure as they are devised and used by top orthopaedic surgeons. The approach is technique-oriented, covering operations, manipulations, and instruments being developed and applied in such as arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and trauma. Each issue is guest-edited by an expert in the field and devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信