Exploring Animation Styles to Communicate the Effects of Exercise on Gut Microbiota

Veronica Zoeckler, Christine D. Young, Karen Bucher, Jarrad Hampton-Marcell, Kevin Brennan
{"title":"Exploring Animation Styles to Communicate the Effects of Exercise on Gut Microbiota","authors":"Veronica Zoeckler, Christine D. Young, Karen Bucher, Jarrad Hampton-Marcell, Kevin Brennan","doi":"10.5210/jbc.v42i2.9560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study of learning principle-designed scientific animation sought to determine whether animation is an effective teaching tool and what components of animation fulfill that role. It is known that there is a lack of animations that concretely support research-based learning principles. There are qualitative studies describing how different visual styles of animation may affect learning. These studies have provided the visual preferences and opinions of certain audiences. However, there are much fewer quantitative studies that objectively test whether differences in visual style produce different learning outcomes. The limited amount of scientific papers demonstrating how animation design effects comprehension leads to a concern that most scientific animations are crafted according to creator preferences and rely on instinct rather than evidence-based practices. This study analyzed the effects of one component of scientific animation, realism, to quantitatively assess the effects of visual realism on learning and to quantitatively gather viewer preferences and opinions on this subject. One animation was designed using cognitive principles and artistic standards. It was rendered into three distinct visual styles with progressive increase in level of detail: schematic, semi-realistic, realistic. Participants were randomly assigned a level of detail, assessed on the animation material, and given samples of the styles to comment on. There was a positive improvement in test scores before and after viewing one of the three animation styles. The greatest improvement in test scores was seen among participants with low prior knowledge who were shown the simplest visual style (schematic). The vast majority of participants preferred the most detailed version. About ten percent of participants claimed to see \"no difference\" among the three visual styles when asked to choose a preferred rendering. From these results it was concluded that an animation can effectively fulfill learning design even with simplified visuals. Simplified 3D animations can be specifically beneficial to beginners. This study benefitted from user preference input even though the preferred visual style (realistic) was not linked to a significantly better improvement in scores. The results emphasize the need to integrate learning principles in scientific animation design.","PeriodicalId":75049,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of biocommunication","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of biocommunication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5210/jbc.v42i2.9560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study of learning principle-designed scientific animation sought to determine whether animation is an effective teaching tool and what components of animation fulfill that role. It is known that there is a lack of animations that concretely support research-based learning principles. There are qualitative studies describing how different visual styles of animation may affect learning. These studies have provided the visual preferences and opinions of certain audiences. However, there are much fewer quantitative studies that objectively test whether differences in visual style produce different learning outcomes. The limited amount of scientific papers demonstrating how animation design effects comprehension leads to a concern that most scientific animations are crafted according to creator preferences and rely on instinct rather than evidence-based practices. This study analyzed the effects of one component of scientific animation, realism, to quantitatively assess the effects of visual realism on learning and to quantitatively gather viewer preferences and opinions on this subject. One animation was designed using cognitive principles and artistic standards. It was rendered into three distinct visual styles with progressive increase in level of detail: schematic, semi-realistic, realistic. Participants were randomly assigned a level of detail, assessed on the animation material, and given samples of the styles to comment on. There was a positive improvement in test scores before and after viewing one of the three animation styles. The greatest improvement in test scores was seen among participants with low prior knowledge who were shown the simplest visual style (schematic). The vast majority of participants preferred the most detailed version. About ten percent of participants claimed to see "no difference" among the three visual styles when asked to choose a preferred rendering. From these results it was concluded that an animation can effectively fulfill learning design even with simplified visuals. Simplified 3D animations can be specifically beneficial to beginners. This study benefitted from user preference input even though the preferred visual style (realistic) was not linked to a significantly better improvement in scores. The results emphasize the need to integrate learning principles in scientific animation design.
探索动画风格来传达运动对肠道微生物群的影响
本研究的学习原理设计的科学动画试图确定动画是否是一种有效的教学工具,动画的哪些组成部分履行这一角色。众所周知,目前缺乏具体支持研究性学习原则的动画。有定性研究描述了不同视觉风格的动画如何影响学习。这些研究提供了某些观众的视觉偏好和意见。然而,客观地测试视觉风格差异是否会产生不同的学习结果的定量研究要少得多。展示动画设计如何影响理解的科学论文数量有限,这导致人们担心大多数科学动画是根据创作者的偏好制作的,依赖于本能,而不是基于证据的实践。本研究分析了科学动画的一个组成部分——现实主义的影响,以定量评估视觉现实主义对学习的影响,并定量收集观众对这一主题的偏好和意见。一个动画是用认知原理和艺术标准设计的。它被渲染成三种不同的视觉风格,逐步增加细节水平:示意图,半现实,现实。参与者被随机分配了一个细节水平,对动画材料进行评估,并给出风格样本进行评论。在观看三种动画风格中的一种之前和之后,测试成绩都有积极的提高。测试成绩提高最大的是那些拥有较低先验知识的参与者,他们被展示了最简单的视觉风格(示意图)。绝大多数参与者更喜欢最详细的版本。当被要求选择最喜欢的渲染时,大约10%的参与者声称在三种视觉风格中“没有区别”。从这些结果可以得出结论,动画可以有效地完成学习设计,即使简化了视觉效果。简化的3D动画对初学者特别有益。这项研究受益于用户偏好输入,即使首选的视觉风格(现实主义)与分数的显著提高无关。研究结果强调了在科学动画设计中整合学习原则的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信