Approach to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on some psychological symptoms and attachment theory: A web-based community survey
Ş. Gıca
{"title":"Approach to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on some psychological symptoms and attachment theory: A web-based community survey","authors":"Ş. Gıca","doi":"10.14744/dajpns.2022.00205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of psychiatric symptoms such as anxiety, obsession, hostility, and attachment styles, which may be associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Method(s): A total of 504 adult participants were included in the study. The sociodemographic data form, including questions on information about participants' COVID-19 infection history and concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, was filled out by the participants. The participants were evaluated with the anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), hostility, and paranoid ideation subscales of the Symptom Checklist - Revised 90 scale and the Adults Attachment Style Scale (AASS). The participants were divided into three groups: \"vaccinated group (VG),\" \"nonvaccinated but intend to get vaccinated group (IGV),\" and \"nonvaccinated group and not intend to get vaccinated group (NIGV).\" Results: The mean score of the AASS secure subscale was higher (p=0.009), while the SCL-90 anxiety subscale was lower (p=0.003) in the NIGV group. The mean score of the SCL-90 OCD subscale in the NIGV group was lower than that in the IGV group (p=0.040). Regression analysis showed that concerns about the safety of vaccines (OR: 140, p<0.001) and having secure attachment style (OR: 1.787, p=0.019) increase the intention to not be vaccinated. However, it was found that high anxiety scores decreased the intention not to be vaccinated (OR: 0.966, p=0.035). Conclusion(s): The findings of the current study indicate that secure attachment style and clinical psychiatric entities such as anxiety and obsession were effective on vaccine hesitancy. However, this interaction needs to be interpreted carefully in the context of the perceived level of COVID-19 threat, more detailed information about the safety and necessity of vaccines, the relationship of individuals with their social environment, and the predominance of vaccine hesitancy in their social environment.Copyright © 2023 Yerkure Tanitim ve Yayincilik Hizmetleri A.S.. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":11480,"journal":{"name":"Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/dajpns.2022.00205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of psychiatric symptoms such as anxiety, obsession, hostility, and attachment styles, which may be associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Method(s): A total of 504 adult participants were included in the study. The sociodemographic data form, including questions on information about participants' COVID-19 infection history and concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, was filled out by the participants. The participants were evaluated with the anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), hostility, and paranoid ideation subscales of the Symptom Checklist - Revised 90 scale and the Adults Attachment Style Scale (AASS). The participants were divided into three groups: "vaccinated group (VG)," "nonvaccinated but intend to get vaccinated group (IGV)," and "nonvaccinated group and not intend to get vaccinated group (NIGV)." Results: The mean score of the AASS secure subscale was higher (p=0.009), while the SCL-90 anxiety subscale was lower (p=0.003) in the NIGV group. The mean score of the SCL-90 OCD subscale in the NIGV group was lower than that in the IGV group (p=0.040). Regression analysis showed that concerns about the safety of vaccines (OR: 140, p<0.001) and having secure attachment style (OR: 1.787, p=0.019) increase the intention to not be vaccinated. However, it was found that high anxiety scores decreased the intention not to be vaccinated (OR: 0.966, p=0.035). Conclusion(s): The findings of the current study indicate that secure attachment style and clinical psychiatric entities such as anxiety and obsession were effective on vaccine hesitancy. However, this interaction needs to be interpreted carefully in the context of the perceived level of COVID-19 threat, more detailed information about the safety and necessity of vaccines, the relationship of individuals with their social environment, and the predominance of vaccine hesitancy in their social environment.Copyright © 2023 Yerkure Tanitim ve Yayincilik Hizmetleri A.S.. All rights reserved.
基于某些心理症状和依恋理论的COVID-19疫苗犹豫研究:基于网络的社区调查
目的:本研究旨在探讨焦虑、痴迷、敌意和依恋类型等精神症状对COVID-19疫苗犹豫的影响。方法:共纳入504名成人受试者。社会人口统计数据表由参与者填写,包括参与者的COVID-19感染史信息和对COVID-19疫苗的担忧。采用《症状检查表-修正90量表》中的焦虑、强迫症、敌意、偏执观念分量表和成人依恋类型量表(AASS)对被试进行评估。参与者被分为三组:“接种疫苗组(VG)”、“未接种疫苗但打算接种疫苗组(IGV)”和“未接种疫苗但不打算接种疫苗组(NIGV)”。结果:NIGV组AASS安全量表平均得分较高(p=0.009), SCL-90焦虑量表平均得分较低(p=0.003)。NIGV组SCL-90强迫症分量表平均得分低于IGV组(p=0.040)。回归分析显示,对疫苗安全性的担忧(OR: 140, p<0.001)和安全依恋类型(OR: 1.787, p=0.019)增加了不接种疫苗的意愿。然而,我们发现高焦虑得分降低了不接种疫苗的意愿(OR: 0.966, p=0.035)。结论:本研究结果表明,安全依恋类型和临床精神实体(如焦虑和痴迷)对疫苗犹豫有效。然而,这种相互作用需要在COVID-19威胁的感知水平、关于疫苗安全性和必要性的更详细信息、个人与其社会环境的关系以及在其社会环境中疫苗犹豫占主导地位的背景下仔细解释。版权所有©2023 Yerkure Tanitim ve Yayincilik Hizmetleri A.S。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。