Fixed and on-demand regimens of acetaminophen in periodontal surgery

Q4 Dentistry
C. Piardi, Cristiane Galli Vaz, M. B. Ferreira, D. Pilger, M. I. Fernandes, P. Weidlich
{"title":"Fixed and on-demand regimens of acetaminophen in periodontal surgery","authors":"C. Piardi, Cristiane Galli Vaz, M. B. Ferreira, D. Pilger, M. I. Fernandes, P. Weidlich","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8668329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an acetaminophen analgesic by comparing its prescription in fixed versus ondemand schedules after periodontal surgery. The hypothesis of the study was that the fixed regimen would be more effective than the on-demand regimen for postoperative analgesics following periodontal surgery. Methods: An open randomized clinical trial was conducted. The 68 patients who needed total flap surgery to restore supracrestal tissue attachment or surgical treatment of periodontitis were randomized”. Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess pain. The fixed group (n = 34) received 500 mg of acetaminophen every 4 hours for 2 days. The on-demand group (n = 34) was instructed to use the acetaminophen “as needed,” at intervals of no less than 4 hours between doses. Ibuprofen was the rescue medication for both groups. Pain scores and medication use were recorded 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the surgical procedure. The study was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under RBR-7wv259. Results: The two groups did not differ in relation to the frequency or the intensity of pain in a 48-hour period (n=20 in the fixed group, and n=22 in the on-demand group), or even in the intention-to-treat (n=34 in each group). Individuals who experienced moderate to severe pain used rescue medication more frequently in both groups. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Both regimens were effective in controlling postoperative pain after periodontal surgery.","PeriodicalId":34984,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8668329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an acetaminophen analgesic by comparing its prescription in fixed versus ondemand schedules after periodontal surgery. The hypothesis of the study was that the fixed regimen would be more effective than the on-demand regimen for postoperative analgesics following periodontal surgery. Methods: An open randomized clinical trial was conducted. The 68 patients who needed total flap surgery to restore supracrestal tissue attachment or surgical treatment of periodontitis were randomized”. Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess pain. The fixed group (n = 34) received 500 mg of acetaminophen every 4 hours for 2 days. The on-demand group (n = 34) was instructed to use the acetaminophen “as needed,” at intervals of no less than 4 hours between doses. Ibuprofen was the rescue medication for both groups. Pain scores and medication use were recorded 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the surgical procedure. The study was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under RBR-7wv259. Results: The two groups did not differ in relation to the frequency or the intensity of pain in a 48-hour period (n=20 in the fixed group, and n=22 in the on-demand group), or even in the intention-to-treat (n=34 in each group). Individuals who experienced moderate to severe pain used rescue medication more frequently in both groups. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Both regimens were effective in controlling postoperative pain after periodontal surgery.
对乙酰氨基酚在牙周手术中的固定和按需治疗方案
目的:通过比较对乙酰氨基酚在牙周手术后的固定处方和按需处方,评价对乙酰氨基酚镇痛药的临床疗效。本研究的假设是固定方案比按需方案对牙周手术术后镇痛更有效。方法:采用开放式随机临床试验。随机选取68例牙周炎患者进行全皮瓣手术修复牙周上组织附着或手术治疗。采用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。固定组(n = 34)每4 h给予对乙酰氨基酚500 mg,连用2天。按需治疗组(n = 34)被指示“根据需要”使用对乙酰氨基酚,每次剂量之间的间隔不少于4小时。布洛芬是两组患者的救助药物。术后2、6、12、24、48小时分别记录疼痛评分和用药情况。该研究已在巴西临床试验登记处注册,编号为RBR-7wv259。结果:两组在48小时内疼痛的频率和强度(固定组20例,按需组22例),甚至在治疗意向(两组34例)上均无差异。在两组中,经历中度至重度疼痛的个体更频繁地使用救援药物。无不良事件报告。结论:两种方案均能有效控制牙周术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences is an international non-profit journal, which publishes full-Length papers, original research reports, literature reviews, special reports, clinical cases, current topics and short communications, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信