Analysis of the Feasibility and Efficacy of Ambulatory/Day Care Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: An Initial Experience

Adittya K. Sharma, M. Nagabhushan, G. Girish, A. J. Kamath, C. Ratkal, G. Venkatesh
{"title":"Analysis of the Feasibility and Efficacy of Ambulatory/Day Care Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: An Initial Experience","authors":"Adittya K. Sharma, M. Nagabhushan, G. Girish, A. J. Kamath, C. Ratkal, G. Venkatesh","doi":"10.3834/UIJ.1944-5784.2013.08.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well-accepted procedure for uncomplicated renal calculi. We prospectively evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of day care/ambulatory PCNL (totally tubeless, discharge within 24 hours) for selected patients for which only few case series have been reported. Materials and Methods: Total tubeless PCNL was planned in 40 easily accessible patients with uncomplicated renal calculi, with single infracostal punctures, normal intraoperative events, and acceptable postoperative parameters (visual analogue pain score, parenteral analgesic requirement, bleeding, urinary soakage, hemodynamic stability), allowing an early discharge within 24 hours. Parameters like pain score and analgesic requirement, any complications, and return date to normal work were evaluated at follow-up. Ultrasonography was performed after a week to document stone clearance. results: Mean patient age was 38.6 years (22 to 62), stone size was 21.4 mm (15.4 to 30), and operating time was 72 minutes (42 to 106) without blood transfusion. Regional anesthesia was used in 13 cases while general anesthesia was used in the rest of the patients. Average pain score after 6 hours of surgery was 2.3 (1.8 to 3.6) with vitals in the normal range, and hospital stay was 12.5 hours (5.5 to 23.5). Six patients were excluded due to periand postoperative events (2: multiple punctures, 1: hematuria, 1: urine leak, 2: pain). This data was taken with the intention to treat the analysis with a successful application of study protocol in 34 (85%) of preoperatively selected cases. Out of 34 patients that qualified for a complete study protocol, 11 were discharged on the same day of surgery while the rest were discharged the next morning. Postoperative USG confirmed no residual calculus, and all patients had uneventful recoveries. Three patients had minor complications (mild hematuria/ urine leaks), which were managed conservatively. conclusion: Our experience with ambulatory PCNL in properly selected cases suggests it as a feasible and effective option that can safely be offered to patients, providing uncomplicated surgery and favorable postoperative parameters. KEYWOrDs: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, nephrolithiasis, kidney calculi cOrrEsPONDENcE: Adittya K. Sharma, MCh, Institute of Nephro-Urology, Victoria Hospital Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, India (dradityaonline@gmail.com, dradityaks@gmail.com) cItAtION: UroToday Int J. 2013 August;6(4):art 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.03 UroToday International Journal® ©2013 Digital Science Press, Inc. UIJ / Vol 6 / Iss 4 / August / http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.03 http://www.urotodayinternationaljournal.com ISSN 1944-5792 (print), ISSN 1944-5784 (online) INtrODuctION Renal calculi pose major health issues in our society with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) being standard treatments of choice. SWL is the procedure of choice for most renal stones up to 2 cm except selected cases with unfavorable factors. PCNL is the choice for calculi larger than 2 cm without any absolute contraindication to the procedure [1]. While the former gives the advantage of being noninvasive, day care later gives predictable stone clearance in a single sitting. Various modifications (supine PCNL, lateral PCNL) [2,3] in conventional prone PCNL have been tried to reduce operative time, postoperative morbidity, and allows for early discharge. After the first report of outpatient PCNL by Preminger et al. [4], in the past few years there have been various case series reporting day care/ambulatory PCNL with discharge on the same or following day within 24 hours [5-8]. We decided to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of","PeriodicalId":23406,"journal":{"name":"Urotoday International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urotoday International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3834/UIJ.1944-5784.2013.08.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well-accepted procedure for uncomplicated renal calculi. We prospectively evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of day care/ambulatory PCNL (totally tubeless, discharge within 24 hours) for selected patients for which only few case series have been reported. Materials and Methods: Total tubeless PCNL was planned in 40 easily accessible patients with uncomplicated renal calculi, with single infracostal punctures, normal intraoperative events, and acceptable postoperative parameters (visual analogue pain score, parenteral analgesic requirement, bleeding, urinary soakage, hemodynamic stability), allowing an early discharge within 24 hours. Parameters like pain score and analgesic requirement, any complications, and return date to normal work were evaluated at follow-up. Ultrasonography was performed after a week to document stone clearance. results: Mean patient age was 38.6 years (22 to 62), stone size was 21.4 mm (15.4 to 30), and operating time was 72 minutes (42 to 106) without blood transfusion. Regional anesthesia was used in 13 cases while general anesthesia was used in the rest of the patients. Average pain score after 6 hours of surgery was 2.3 (1.8 to 3.6) with vitals in the normal range, and hospital stay was 12.5 hours (5.5 to 23.5). Six patients were excluded due to periand postoperative events (2: multiple punctures, 1: hematuria, 1: urine leak, 2: pain). This data was taken with the intention to treat the analysis with a successful application of study protocol in 34 (85%) of preoperatively selected cases. Out of 34 patients that qualified for a complete study protocol, 11 were discharged on the same day of surgery while the rest were discharged the next morning. Postoperative USG confirmed no residual calculus, and all patients had uneventful recoveries. Three patients had minor complications (mild hematuria/ urine leaks), which were managed conservatively. conclusion: Our experience with ambulatory PCNL in properly selected cases suggests it as a feasible and effective option that can safely be offered to patients, providing uncomplicated surgery and favorable postoperative parameters. KEYWOrDs: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, nephrolithiasis, kidney calculi cOrrEsPONDENcE: Adittya K. Sharma, MCh, Institute of Nephro-Urology, Victoria Hospital Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, India (dradityaonline@gmail.com, dradityaks@gmail.com) cItAtION: UroToday Int J. 2013 August;6(4):art 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.03 UroToday International Journal® ©2013 Digital Science Press, Inc. UIJ / Vol 6 / Iss 4 / August / http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.03 http://www.urotodayinternationaljournal.com ISSN 1944-5792 (print), ISSN 1944-5784 (online) INtrODuctION Renal calculi pose major health issues in our society with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) being standard treatments of choice. SWL is the procedure of choice for most renal stones up to 2 cm except selected cases with unfavorable factors. PCNL is the choice for calculi larger than 2 cm without any absolute contraindication to the procedure [1]. While the former gives the advantage of being noninvasive, day care later gives predictable stone clearance in a single sitting. Various modifications (supine PCNL, lateral PCNL) [2,3] in conventional prone PCNL have been tried to reduce operative time, postoperative morbidity, and allows for early discharge. After the first report of outpatient PCNL by Preminger et al. [4], in the past few years there have been various case series reporting day care/ambulatory PCNL with discharge on the same or following day within 24 hours [5-8]. We decided to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of
门诊/日间护理经皮肾镜取石术的可行性及疗效分析:初步经验
目的:无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗无并发症肾结石的常用方法。我们前瞻性地评估了日托/门诊PCNL(完全无管,24小时内出院)的安全性、可行性和有效性,这些患者只有少数病例系列报道。材料与方法:对40例易接近、单次肋下穿刺、术中事件正常、术后参数可接受(视觉模拟疼痛评分、肠外镇痛需求、出血、尿浸、血流动力学稳定性)的无管全肾穿刺患者进行全无管PCNL, 24小时内尽早出院。随访时评估疼痛评分、镇痛需求、并发症及恢复正常工作时间等参数。一周后超声检查结石清除情况。结果:患者平均年龄38.6岁(22 ~ 62岁),结石大小21.4 mm(15.4 ~ 30),手术时间72分钟(42 ~ 106),无输血。局部麻醉13例,全麻13例。术后6小时的平均疼痛评分为2.3(1.8 ~ 3.6),生命体征在正常范围内,住院时间为12.5小时(5.5 ~ 23.5)。6例患者因术后周围事件(2例:多次穿刺,1例:血尿,1例:尿漏,2例:疼痛)被排除。收集这些数据的目的是在34例(85%)的术前选择病例中成功应用研究方案进行分析。在34名符合完整研究方案的患者中,11名患者在手术当天出院,其余患者在第二天早上出院。术后USG证实无结石残留,所有患者均顺利恢复。3例患者有轻微的并发症(轻度血尿/尿漏),采用保守治疗。结论:我们在适当选择的病例中进行门诊PCNL的经验表明,它是一种可行有效的选择,可以安全地提供给患者,提供简单的手术和良好的术后参数。关键词:经皮肾镜取石术,肾结石,肾结石通信:Adittya K. Sharma, MCh,肾泌尿科研究所,维多利亚医院校区,班加罗尔,卡纳塔克邦,印度(dradityaonline@gmail.com, dradityaks@gmail.com)引文:UroToday Int J. 2013 August;6(4):第44条。http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.03 UroToday International Journal®©2013 Digital Science Press, Inc。UIJ / Vol 6 / Iss 4/ August / http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.03 http://www.urotodayinternationaljournal.com ISSN 1944-5792(印刷),ISSN 1944-5784(在线)简介肾结石是我们社会的主要健康问题,经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和冲击波碎石术(SWL)是标准的治疗选择。除了一些有不利因素的病例外,SWL是大多数2厘米以下肾结石的首选手术。对于结石大于2 cm的患者可选择PCNL,无绝对禁忌症[1]。前者具有非侵入性的优势,而日托后一种方式只需坐一次就能清除可预测的结石。传统俯卧位PCNL的各种改良(仰卧位PCNL、侧卧位PCNL)[2,3]已被尝试,以减少手术时间、术后发病率,并允许早期出院。在Preminger等人[4]首次报道门诊PCNL后,在过去的几年里,有各种病例系列报道了日间/门诊PCNL,并在同一天或第二天24小时内出院[5-8]。我们决定评估…的可行性和有效性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信