Revisiting Partition: Contestation, Narratives and Memories

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Sumallya Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"Revisiting Partition: Contestation, Narratives and Memories","authors":"Sumallya Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1080/19438192.2022.2123148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the in-between but this is then only explored explicitly by a few of the contributors (notably in Chapter 3, Chapter 4 and Chapter 8). Once again, it would have been good to have seen more direct engagement with the idea of the ‘in-between’, possibly linking this to the related and now widely used concept of liminality. Considering the contributions in the book as a whole it is clear that there is great breadth both in terms of countries covered and in terms of the types of middle-class migrants profiled. Certainly, the notion of ‘a middle-class’ is problematic, and the book goes a long way in recognising this: emphasising a need for nuance and plurality when discussing the spectrum of middling migrants. In this sense, it takes us well beyond the early literature (from the mid2000s) on middle-class migration. Related to this, whilst the book is squarely focused on class, other facets of identity are brought to the fore such as race, gender and age. This diversity and nuance is a real strength and underlines the importance of edited collections like this in building up sophisticated and multi-dimensional empirical and conceptual insight. Ultimately, one is left in no doubt of the need for a class-based lens when considering middling migrants’ experiences and trajectories, but one is also left in no doubt that a class-based lens on its own is insufficient. Throughout, the book draws upon very rich empirical material, with all contributors opting for in-depth qualitative methods and often drawing on impressive sample sizes. Going forward, there is certainly room for complementary quantitative research into middle-class migration, more policy engagement, and further development of the notions of ‘privilege’ and ‘in-between’ status (ideally with reference to related established concepts in the extant literature). The potential for future middling migration research, and the platform established by this edited collection, is something that could have been reflected upon in a concluding section and the book does end a little abruptly. Overall, and despite minor gripes, Rethinking Privilege and Social Mobility in Middle-Class Migration will undoubtedly anchor and inspire future studies of middle-class mobility which, given the predicted growth of the middle-classes, is likely to become an ever more important strand of international migration research. The collection (all 11 chapters are of high quality) is one that I would certainly recommend to readers of the South Asian Diaspora and to students and researchers from across the social sciences more generally.","PeriodicalId":42548,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Diaspora","volume":"5 1","pages":"114 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Diaspora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2022.2123148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

the in-between but this is then only explored explicitly by a few of the contributors (notably in Chapter 3, Chapter 4 and Chapter 8). Once again, it would have been good to have seen more direct engagement with the idea of the ‘in-between’, possibly linking this to the related and now widely used concept of liminality. Considering the contributions in the book as a whole it is clear that there is great breadth both in terms of countries covered and in terms of the types of middle-class migrants profiled. Certainly, the notion of ‘a middle-class’ is problematic, and the book goes a long way in recognising this: emphasising a need for nuance and plurality when discussing the spectrum of middling migrants. In this sense, it takes us well beyond the early literature (from the mid2000s) on middle-class migration. Related to this, whilst the book is squarely focused on class, other facets of identity are brought to the fore such as race, gender and age. This diversity and nuance is a real strength and underlines the importance of edited collections like this in building up sophisticated and multi-dimensional empirical and conceptual insight. Ultimately, one is left in no doubt of the need for a class-based lens when considering middling migrants’ experiences and trajectories, but one is also left in no doubt that a class-based lens on its own is insufficient. Throughout, the book draws upon very rich empirical material, with all contributors opting for in-depth qualitative methods and often drawing on impressive sample sizes. Going forward, there is certainly room for complementary quantitative research into middle-class migration, more policy engagement, and further development of the notions of ‘privilege’ and ‘in-between’ status (ideally with reference to related established concepts in the extant literature). The potential for future middling migration research, and the platform established by this edited collection, is something that could have been reflected upon in a concluding section and the book does end a little abruptly. Overall, and despite minor gripes, Rethinking Privilege and Social Mobility in Middle-Class Migration will undoubtedly anchor and inspire future studies of middle-class mobility which, given the predicted growth of the middle-classes, is likely to become an ever more important strand of international migration research. The collection (all 11 chapters are of high quality) is one that I would certainly recommend to readers of the South Asian Diaspora and to students and researchers from across the social sciences more generally.
重访分区:争论、叙述与记忆
中间,但只有少数贡献者明确地探讨了这一点(特别是在第3章,第4章和第8章)。再一次,如果能看到更直接地参与到“中间”的概念中,可能将其与相关的、现在广泛使用的阈限概念联系起来,那就太好了。将本书的贡献作为一个整体来考虑,很明显,无论是从所涵盖的国家还是从所描述的中产阶级移民的类型来看,这本书都有很大的广度。当然,“中产阶级”的概念是有问题的,这本书在认识到这一点上走了很长的路:在讨论中产阶级移民的范围时,强调了细微差别和多元化的必要性。从这个意义上说,它让我们远远超越了关于中产阶级移民的早期文献(从2000年代中期开始)。与此相关的是,虽然这本书直接关注阶级,但身份的其他方面也被提了出来,比如种族、性别和年龄。这种多样性和细微差别是一种真正的力量,并强调了像这样的编辑集合在建立复杂和多维经验和概念洞察力方面的重要性。最终,毫无疑问,在考虑中产阶级移民的经历和轨迹时,需要以阶级为基础的视角,但毫无疑问,以阶级为基础的视角本身是不够的。在整个过程中,这本书借鉴了非常丰富的经验材料,所有贡献者都选择了深入的定性方法,并经常绘制令人印象深刻的样本量。展望未来,对于中产阶级移民、更多的政策参与以及进一步发展“特权”和“中间”地位的概念(最好参考现有文献中相关的既定概念),肯定有补充定量研究的空间。未来中等移民研究的潜力,以及这本编辑集所建立的平台,本可以在结束语中反映出来,但这本书确实结束得有点突然。总的来说,尽管有一些抱怨,《重新思考中产阶级移民中的特权和社会流动》无疑将锚定和启发未来的中产阶级流动研究,考虑到中产阶级的预期增长,这可能成为国际移民研究中越来越重要的一部分。这本合集(全部11章都是高质量的)我一定会推荐给南亚侨民的读者,以及来自社会科学领域的学生和研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South Asian Diaspora
South Asian Diaspora AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信