Effects of self-monitoring devices on blood pressure in older adults with hypertension and diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

Y. Gu, X. Bao, Yanyan Wang, G. Meng, Hongmei Wu, Qing Zhang, Li Liu, K. Song, Yaogang Wang, K. Niu
{"title":"Effects of self-monitoring devices on blood pressure in older adults with hypertension and diabetes: a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Y. Gu, X. Bao, Yanyan Wang, G. Meng, Hongmei Wu, Qing Zhang, Li Liu, K. Song, Yaogang Wang, K. Niu","doi":"10.1136/jech-2019-212531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hypertension and diabetes frequently coexist, which results in the difficulty of hypertension control in community-dwelling elderly adults who lack effective prevention and control strategies. The aim of this study is to determine whether a combined pedometer and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) programme could improve blood pressure (BP) among community-dwelling elderly adults with hypertension and diabetes. Methods The trial was a 2×2 factorial randomised clinical trial that recruited 180 community-dwelling elderly people (aged ≥60) with hypertension and diabetes in Tianjin, China. Participants were randomly assigned to control, pedometer, HBPM, and pedometer+HBPM groups. Intervention period was 12 months. The coprimary outcomes of the study were systolic and diastolic BP; the secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension. BP was measured twice in the right arm using a mercurial sphygmomanometer. The mean of these two measurements was taken as the BP value. Results At 12 months, compared with the control group, the adjusted differences in least squares mean (95% CI) in systolic and diastolic BP changes for pedometer, HBPM, and pedometer+HBPM groups were −4.2 (–8.4 to 0.1), –2.7 (–6.9 to 1.5) and −8.1 (–12.3 to –3.9) mm Hg (p<0.01); −3.2 (–5.2 to –1.1), −0.1(−2.1 to 1.9) and −3.6 (–5.6 to –1.5) mm Hg (p<0.001), respectively; the adjusted difference in percentage (95% CI) in the controlled hypertension (BP <140/90 mm Hg) for pedometer, HBPM and pedometer+HBPM groups were 7.5 (–12.2 to 27.1), 9.9 (–10.4 to 30.3) and 23.1 (5.0 to 41.1) (p=0.09). Conclusion Combination pedometer and HBPM interventions can significantly decrease BP levels in elderly adults with hypertension and diabetes. Trials Registration number UMIN000021613.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Hypertension and diabetes frequently coexist, which results in the difficulty of hypertension control in community-dwelling elderly adults who lack effective prevention and control strategies. The aim of this study is to determine whether a combined pedometer and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) programme could improve blood pressure (BP) among community-dwelling elderly adults with hypertension and diabetes. Methods The trial was a 2×2 factorial randomised clinical trial that recruited 180 community-dwelling elderly people (aged ≥60) with hypertension and diabetes in Tianjin, China. Participants were randomly assigned to control, pedometer, HBPM, and pedometer+HBPM groups. Intervention period was 12 months. The coprimary outcomes of the study were systolic and diastolic BP; the secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension. BP was measured twice in the right arm using a mercurial sphygmomanometer. The mean of these two measurements was taken as the BP value. Results At 12 months, compared with the control group, the adjusted differences in least squares mean (95% CI) in systolic and diastolic BP changes for pedometer, HBPM, and pedometer+HBPM groups were −4.2 (–8.4 to 0.1), –2.7 (–6.9 to 1.5) and −8.1 (–12.3 to –3.9) mm Hg (p<0.01); −3.2 (–5.2 to –1.1), −0.1(−2.1 to 1.9) and −3.6 (–5.6 to –1.5) mm Hg (p<0.001), respectively; the adjusted difference in percentage (95% CI) in the controlled hypertension (BP <140/90 mm Hg) for pedometer, HBPM and pedometer+HBPM groups were 7.5 (–12.2 to 27.1), 9.9 (–10.4 to 30.3) and 23.1 (5.0 to 41.1) (p=0.09). Conclusion Combination pedometer and HBPM interventions can significantly decrease BP levels in elderly adults with hypertension and diabetes. Trials Registration number UMIN000021613.
自我监测装置对老年高血压和糖尿病患者血压的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景高血压与糖尿病经常共存,导致社区老年人高血压控制困难,缺乏有效的防治策略。本研究的目的是确定计步器和家庭血压监测(HBPM)联合项目是否可以改善社区居住的高血压和糖尿病老年人的血压(BP)。方法:该试验是一项2×2因子随机临床试验,在中国天津招募180名社区居住的高血压和糖尿病老年人(年龄≥60岁)。参与者被随机分配到对照组、计步器组、HBPM组和计步器+HBPM组。干预期为12个月。研究的主要结果是收缩压和舒张压;次要结局包括高血压得到控制的患者比例。用水银血压计在右臂测量两次血压。取这两个测量值的平均值作为BP值。结果12个月时,与对照组相比,计步器组、HBPM组和计步器+HBPM组收缩压和舒张压变化的最小二乘平均值(95% CI)校正差异为- 4.2(-8.4 ~ 0.1)、-2.7(-6.9 ~ 1.5)和- 8.1 (-12.3 ~ -3.9)mm Hg (p<0.01);−3.2(-5.2 - -1.1),0.1(−2.1到1.9)和−−3.6(-5.6 - -1.5毫米汞柱)(p < 0.001),分别;计步器组、HBPM组和计步器+HBPM组控制性高血压(血压<140/90 mm Hg)的调整后百分比差异(95% CI)分别为7.5(-12.2 ~ 27.1)、9.9(-10.4 ~ 30.3)和23.1 (5.0 ~ 41.1)(p=0.09)。结论计步器与HBPM联合干预可显著降低老年高血压合并糖尿病患者的血压水平。试验注册号为UMIN000021613。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信