Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow: Best Practice for CSF Sampling of an EVD to Minimise Patient Risk

R. Crane, Nicole M. King
{"title":"Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow: Best Practice for CSF Sampling of an EVD to Minimise Patient Risk","authors":"R. Crane, Nicole M. King","doi":"10.21307/AJON-2017-114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Managing raised intracranial pressure (ICP) with the use of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a common occurrence in a neurosurgical setting. A central role of the neuroscience nurse in managing that EVD is to monitor the patient for signs and symptoms of infection otherwise known as ventriculitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling from an EVD has historically been completed as a daily routine specimen to monitor for any signs of infection. However, in more recent times there has been evidence to suggest that specimens should only be collected when infection or ventriculitis is suspected to minimise the interruption of the closed system. Different practices have been identified related to the frequency of sampling, the best solution for decontamination of the sampling site/port and preferable port for obtaining the specimen. Our aim was to complete an integrative literature review. Medline Complete and CINAHL were searched and articles were screened. Nine articles were used to form the integrated review. The main findings were collated and found that daily sampling is no longer recommended. The proximal port was the most popular choice for sampling. Decontaminating solutions used for accessing an EVD varied with no evidence to support the choice of solution. Findings of the majority of papers were focussed on sampling frequency and other associated ways to minimise infection rather than choice of sampling site or the use of specific decontaminating solutions.","PeriodicalId":32533,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"48 1","pages":"7 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/AJON-2017-114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Managing raised intracranial pressure (ICP) with the use of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a common occurrence in a neurosurgical setting. A central role of the neuroscience nurse in managing that EVD is to monitor the patient for signs and symptoms of infection otherwise known as ventriculitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling from an EVD has historically been completed as a daily routine specimen to monitor for any signs of infection. However, in more recent times there has been evidence to suggest that specimens should only be collected when infection or ventriculitis is suspected to minimise the interruption of the closed system. Different practices have been identified related to the frequency of sampling, the best solution for decontamination of the sampling site/port and preferable port for obtaining the specimen. Our aim was to complete an integrative literature review. Medline Complete and CINAHL were searched and articles were screened. Nine articles were used to form the integrated review. The main findings were collated and found that daily sampling is no longer recommended. The proximal port was the most popular choice for sampling. Decontaminating solutions used for accessing an EVD varied with no evidence to support the choice of solution. Findings of the majority of papers were focussed on sampling frequency and other associated ways to minimise infection rather than choice of sampling site or the use of specific decontaminating solutions.
昨天,今天和明天:埃博拉病毒病脑脊液取样的最佳做法,以尽量减少患者风险
使用外脑室引流(EVD)处理颅内压升高(ICP)在神经外科环境中很常见。神经科学护士在处理埃博拉病毒病方面的核心作用是监测患者感染的体征和症状,即脑室炎。以往,埃博拉病毒病的脑脊液取样是作为日常常规标本进行的,以监测任何感染迹象。然而,最近有证据表明,只有在怀疑感染或脑室炎时才应采集标本,以尽量减少封闭系统的中断。已经确定了不同的做法,涉及采样频率,采样地点/端口的最佳去污解决方案以及获取样本的首选端口。我们的目的是完成一项综合文献综述。检索Medline Complete和CINAHL并对文章进行筛选。9篇文章被用于形成综合评价。对主要的研究结果进行了整理,发现不再建议每天取样。近端端口是最受欢迎的采样选择。用于处理埃博拉病毒病的去污解决方案各不相同,没有证据支持解决方案的选择。大多数论文的研究结果集中在采样频率和其他相关方法上,以尽量减少感染,而不是选择采样地点或使用特定的去污溶液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书