The constitutional principle of respect for the man of work: problems of implementation in Russian legislation and law enforcement practice

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
S. Chucha
{"title":"The constitutional principle of respect for the man of work: problems of implementation in Russian legislation and law enforcement practice","authors":"S. Chucha","doi":"10.17223/22253513/44/14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respect for the working person is guaranteed by Article 75.1 of the updated Constitution of the Russian Federation. This constitutional guarantee has an external (formal) and an internal (substantive) side of implementation. On the basis of the theory of stability of labour law relations, the basic norms of this twofold system have been identified. 1. On the substantive side, the norms of stability of the employee as a party to the employment contract when the employer changes. The constitutional guarantee of respect for the human being at work is the stability of employment relations, secured mainly by Article 75 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation. The provision of Article 75 of the Russian Labour Code is based on the theory of stability of the employment relationship, conditioned by the personal nature of the employment contract on the part of the employee, the foundations of which were laid at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Today it guarantees the preservation of the employment relationship in the event of a change of ownership of the organisation, a change of subordination of the organisation or its reorganisation. Legislating the dependence of the employment contract on the employer's reorganisation measures would destroy the theory of stability and the system of constitutional and sectoral labour law guarantees of respect for the human rights of workers. Therefore, new forms of employment, the emergence of which is initially dictated by the needs of economic development and the state of society, should be consistently involved in the sphere of labour law regulation. The issues of the stability of the employment contract should be resolved exclusively based on the needs of the organization of production and in the interests of the enterprise. 2. From the external perspective, the basic provision in the system of guarantees of respect for the person at work is the form of the employment contract. Article 56 of the Russian Labour Code, defining the concept of an employment contract, as well as regulatory acts adopted in its development and the generally accepted practice of law do not comply with Article 75.1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 57 of the Labour Code. The inclusion of information about the employee after information about the employer in the employment contract underlines the unequal position of the employee, even if formally, but clearly demonstrates the lack of respect for the employee not only on the part of the employer concluding the contract but also on the part of state authorities which have permitted the publication of regulations contrary to Article 57 of the LC RF. 57 of the Labour Code and provoking the employer to violate the guarantee of Article 75.1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Considering the ethical nature of Russian legal understanding, Article 56 of the LC RF and the standard forms of employment contracts must be immediately brought into compliance with the requirements of Article 57 of the LC RF and Article 75.1 of the RF Constitution, which would be a formal, but obvious respect for the working person on the part of both the state and, subsequently, the employers. The author declares no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/44/14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respect for the working person is guaranteed by Article 75.1 of the updated Constitution of the Russian Federation. This constitutional guarantee has an external (formal) and an internal (substantive) side of implementation. On the basis of the theory of stability of labour law relations, the basic norms of this twofold system have been identified. 1. On the substantive side, the norms of stability of the employee as a party to the employment contract when the employer changes. The constitutional guarantee of respect for the human being at work is the stability of employment relations, secured mainly by Article 75 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation. The provision of Article 75 of the Russian Labour Code is based on the theory of stability of the employment relationship, conditioned by the personal nature of the employment contract on the part of the employee, the foundations of which were laid at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Today it guarantees the preservation of the employment relationship in the event of a change of ownership of the organisation, a change of subordination of the organisation or its reorganisation. Legislating the dependence of the employment contract on the employer's reorganisation measures would destroy the theory of stability and the system of constitutional and sectoral labour law guarantees of respect for the human rights of workers. Therefore, new forms of employment, the emergence of which is initially dictated by the needs of economic development and the state of society, should be consistently involved in the sphere of labour law regulation. The issues of the stability of the employment contract should be resolved exclusively based on the needs of the organization of production and in the interests of the enterprise. 2. From the external perspective, the basic provision in the system of guarantees of respect for the person at work is the form of the employment contract. Article 56 of the Russian Labour Code, defining the concept of an employment contract, as well as regulatory acts adopted in its development and the generally accepted practice of law do not comply with Article 75.1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 57 of the Labour Code. The inclusion of information about the employee after information about the employer in the employment contract underlines the unequal position of the employee, even if formally, but clearly demonstrates the lack of respect for the employee not only on the part of the employer concluding the contract but also on the part of state authorities which have permitted the publication of regulations contrary to Article 57 of the LC RF. 57 of the Labour Code and provoking the employer to violate the guarantee of Article 75.1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Considering the ethical nature of Russian legal understanding, Article 56 of the LC RF and the standard forms of employment contracts must be immediately brought into compliance with the requirements of Article 57 of the LC RF and Article 75.1 of the RF Constitution, which would be a formal, but obvious respect for the working person on the part of both the state and, subsequently, the employers. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
尊重劳动者的宪法原则:俄罗斯立法和执法实践中的实施问题
修订后的俄罗斯联邦宪法第75.1条保障对劳动者的尊重。这一宪法保障有外部(正式)和内部(实质性)两方面的实施。在劳动法律关系稳定性理论的基础上,确定了这一双重制度的基本规范。1. 在实体方面,用人单位变更时劳动者作为劳动合同当事人的稳定性规范。尊重工作中的人的宪法保障是就业关系的稳定,这主要是由俄罗斯联邦《劳动法》第75条保障的。《俄罗斯劳动法》第75条的规定是以雇佣关系稳定理论为基础的,这一理论的条件是雇员的雇佣合同的个人性质,其基础是在19世纪和20世纪初奠定的。今天,它保证在组织所有权发生变化、组织从属关系发生变化或组织重组的情况下保持雇佣关系。通过立法规定雇佣合同依赖于雇主的重组措施,将破坏稳定理论以及宪法和部门劳工法保障尊重工人人权的制度。因此,新的就业形式的出现最初是由经济发展的需要和社会状况所决定的,应始终涉及劳动法条例的领域。劳动合同的稳定性问题只能从生产组织的需要和企业的利益出发来解决。2. 从外部的角度看,保障对劳动者的尊重制度的基本规定是劳动合同的形式。界定雇佣合同概念的《俄罗斯劳动法》第56条以及在其发展过程中通过的管制性法令和普遍接受的法律惯例都不符合《俄罗斯联邦宪法》第75.1条和《劳动法》第57条。在雇佣合同中,在雇主信息之后再加上关于雇员的信息,强调了雇员的不平等地位,即使是正式的,但也清楚地表明,不仅是签订合同的雇主对雇员缺乏尊重,而且国家当局也允许发布违反《劳动法》第57条的规定。并挑唆雇主违反《俄罗斯联邦宪法》第75.1条的保障。考虑到俄罗斯法律理解的伦理性质,俄罗斯联邦联邦委员会第56条和劳动合同的标准形式必须立即符合俄罗斯联邦联邦委员会第57条和俄罗斯联邦宪法第75.1条的要求,这将是国家以及随后的雇主对劳动者的正式但明显的尊重。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信