Diagnostic Value of MRI in Placental Adhesive Disorders in Pregnancy

K. Sathyakumar, A. Chandramohan, A. Eapen, Anuja Abraham
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of MRI in Placental Adhesive Disorders in Pregnancy","authors":"K. Sathyakumar, A. Chandramohan, A. Eapen, Anuja Abraham","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  The spectrum of placental adhesive disorders (PAD) forms an important cause for emergency cesarean hysterectomy, requiring an accurate prenatal diagnosis for optimal obstetric management. Purpose  The aim of this study was to assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to identify the individual MRI features that are most useful in the evaluation of PAD. Materials and Methods  This was a retrospective review of the MRI of 24 women with abnormal placentation, confirmed using histopathology/intraoperative findings as the reference standard. Patients were categorized as negative or positive for PAD (placenta accreta, increta, and percreta) on MRI and compared with the reference standard. We assessed the diagnostic performance of MRI and the features that best correlated with the presence of PAD. Results  Among the 24 women (mean age: 29.8 years) with risk factors, 16 had PAD (6 accreta, 7 increta, and 3 percreta). There was a history of previous lower segment cesarean section and placenta previa in 14 (87.5%). MRI could identify the presence of PAD in all (100% sensitivity) and its absence in three out of eight patients (37.5% specificity). The features with highest sensitivity were intraplacental dark bands (100%), myometrial thinning/loss of interface with myometrium (100%), placental heterogeneity (75%), and uterine contour abnormality (75%). Conclusion  MRI is an important modality for the investigation of PAD in suspected cases, with excellent sensitivity and good accuracy. Identifying the presence of risk factors, low-signal-intensity bands, and thinning/loss of placental–myometrial interface will aid in its diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":52666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  The spectrum of placental adhesive disorders (PAD) forms an important cause for emergency cesarean hysterectomy, requiring an accurate prenatal diagnosis for optimal obstetric management. Purpose  The aim of this study was to assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to identify the individual MRI features that are most useful in the evaluation of PAD. Materials and Methods  This was a retrospective review of the MRI of 24 women with abnormal placentation, confirmed using histopathology/intraoperative findings as the reference standard. Patients were categorized as negative or positive for PAD (placenta accreta, increta, and percreta) on MRI and compared with the reference standard. We assessed the diagnostic performance of MRI and the features that best correlated with the presence of PAD. Results  Among the 24 women (mean age: 29.8 years) with risk factors, 16 had PAD (6 accreta, 7 increta, and 3 percreta). There was a history of previous lower segment cesarean section and placenta previa in 14 (87.5%). MRI could identify the presence of PAD in all (100% sensitivity) and its absence in three out of eight patients (37.5% specificity). The features with highest sensitivity were intraplacental dark bands (100%), myometrial thinning/loss of interface with myometrium (100%), placental heterogeneity (75%), and uterine contour abnormality (75%). Conclusion  MRI is an important modality for the investigation of PAD in suspected cases, with excellent sensitivity and good accuracy. Identifying the presence of risk factors, low-signal-intensity bands, and thinning/loss of placental–myometrial interface will aid in its diagnosis.
MRI对妊娠期胎盘粘连障碍的诊断价值
背景胎盘粘连障碍(PAD)是紧急剖宫产子宫切除术的重要原因,需要准确的产前诊断以获得最佳产科管理。目的本研究的目的是评估磁共振成像(MRI)的效用,并确定在评估PAD中最有用的单个MRI特征。材料和方法回顾性分析24例胎盘异常女性的MRI,以组织病理学/术中发现为参考标准。将患者在MRI上分为PAD(胎盘增生、递增和percreta)阴性或阳性,并与参考标准进行比较。我们评估了MRI的诊断性能和与PAD存在最相关的特征。结果在24例有危险因素的女性(平均年龄29.8岁)中,16例患有PAD(6例为增生,7例为递增,3例为无增生)。有下段剖宫产史及前置胎盘14例(87.5%)。MRI可以识别所有患者的PAD存在(100%的敏感性),8例患者中有3例不存在PAD(37.5%的特异性)。敏感度最高的特征是胎盘暗带(100%)、子宫肌层变薄/与子宫肌层界面丢失(100%)、胎盘异质性(75%)和子宫轮廓异常(75%)。结论MRI是诊断疑似PAD的重要手段,具有良好的敏感性和准确性。识别危险因素、低信号强度带和胎盘-子宫肌界面变薄/丧失的存在将有助于诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信