Assessment of Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Upgrade by Integrated Electrocoagulation Process for Municipal Wastewater Treatment

M. Aqanaghad, Gholamreza Moussavi
{"title":"Assessment of Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Upgrade by Integrated Electrocoagulation Process for Municipal Wastewater Treatment","authors":"M. Aqanaghad, Gholamreza Moussavi","doi":"10.52547/J.HEALTH.11.5.609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) is one of the low cost wastewater treatment systems compared to the aerobic method. Hoverer it should be studied and developed to overcome its limitations such as insufficient nutrient removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the 5 sectional ABR pilot and improve it with integrated electric coagulation process for municipal wastewater treatment. Methods: This study was conducted at Khoy wastewater treatment plant. The ABR was operated for 270 days with hydraulic retention time (HRT) 36-24-18-12h and the integrated reactor was operated for 40 days with duration of 18 hours. The reactors were fed in line from the incoming wastewater to the treatment plant. From the input and output of the system, 245hour combined sampling was performed 225 times and the parameters COD, BOD, TSS, TKN, and TP were measured. Results: The reactor startup took about 105 days. The ABR reached to 79 91%, 9-20%, 1930% and 89-94% COD, TKN, PO4 and TSS removal efficiencies respectively at HRT36 and 12 h. The ABR meted effluent disposal standards of TSS in all conditions and those of COD, TP and BOD at optimum HRT 36h. The integrated ABR meted these and NO3, SO4 standards at HRT 18 h in current density of 0.1mA/cm by aluminum electrodes. Conclusion: The ABR is suitable for municipal wastewater treatment, but it has limitations such as high HRT and failure to meet nitrogen effluent discharge standard. By integrating the EP into the ABR while reducing HRT, its efficiency increased up to twice that of ABR with the same time. Therefore, integrated electrical coagulation can be used to improve ABR efficiency.","PeriodicalId":15954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"609-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/J.HEALTH.11.5.609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) is one of the low cost wastewater treatment systems compared to the aerobic method. Hoverer it should be studied and developed to overcome its limitations such as insufficient nutrient removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the 5 sectional ABR pilot and improve it with integrated electric coagulation process for municipal wastewater treatment. Methods: This study was conducted at Khoy wastewater treatment plant. The ABR was operated for 270 days with hydraulic retention time (HRT) 36-24-18-12h and the integrated reactor was operated for 40 days with duration of 18 hours. The reactors were fed in line from the incoming wastewater to the treatment plant. From the input and output of the system, 245hour combined sampling was performed 225 times and the parameters COD, BOD, TSS, TKN, and TP were measured. Results: The reactor startup took about 105 days. The ABR reached to 79 91%, 9-20%, 1930% and 89-94% COD, TKN, PO4 and TSS removal efficiencies respectively at HRT36 and 12 h. The ABR meted effluent disposal standards of TSS in all conditions and those of COD, TP and BOD at optimum HRT 36h. The integrated ABR meted these and NO3, SO4 standards at HRT 18 h in current density of 0.1mA/cm by aluminum electrodes. Conclusion: The ABR is suitable for municipal wastewater treatment, but it has limitations such as high HRT and failure to meet nitrogen effluent discharge standard. By integrating the EP into the ABR while reducing HRT, its efficiency increased up to twice that of ABR with the same time. Therefore, integrated electrical coagulation can be used to improve ABR efficiency.
综合电混凝工艺处理城市污水厌氧折流板反应器改造效果评价
背景与目的:与好氧法相比,厌氧折流板反应器(ABR)是一种低成本的污水处理系统。然而,它应该被研究和发展,以克服其局限性,如营养去除不足。本研究的目的是评估5段ABR中试的效率,并通过综合电混凝工艺对其进行改进,以处理城市污水。方法:本研究在Khoy污水处理厂进行。ABR运行270天,水力停留时间(HRT) 36-24-18-12h,一体化反应器运行40天,持续时间18小时。这些反应器从流入的废水排到处理厂。从系统的输入和输出进行225次245h联合采样,测量COD、BOD、TSS、TKN、TP等参数。结果:反应器启动时间约105天。在HRT36和12 h时,ABR对COD、TKN、PO4和TSS的去除率分别达到79 91%、9-20%、1930%和89-94%,在所有条件下均达到TSS出水处理标准,在最佳HRT36 h时达到COD、TP和BOD出水处理标准。采用铝电极,在电流密度为0.1mA/cm的条件下,在HRT 18h下,集成ABR满足上述标准和NO3、SO4标准。结论:ABR适用于城市污水处理,但存在HRT高、氮排放不达标等局限性。通过将EP整合到ABR中,同时降低HRT,其效率提高到ABR的两倍。因此,采用一体化电絮凝可以提高ABR效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信