The Image of Power in the “Constitution of the Neutral Peasant Republic of Croatia” (1921)

A. Silkin
{"title":"The Image of Power in the “Constitution of the Neutral Peasant Republic of Croatia” (1921)","authors":"A. Silkin","doi":"10.31168/2619-0877.2022.5.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a tendency in Croatian historiography to present the government Stjepan Radić, who headed the Croatian (Republican) Peasants’ Party, as the forerunner of modern liberal democracy. The argument is the so-called Constitution of the Neutral Peasant Republic (1921), which provided for universal suffrage, government responsibility to the representative body, separation of powers, and so on. However, its other provisions do not align well with liberalism and, in general, with “modern” ideas about the state-legal structure. The Constitution should be viewed not as a draft law, but as a propaganda tool that appealed to the patriarchal-traditional views of the target audience. The state appeared as an enlarged model of a “peasant’s house” or “zadruga”, at the head of which was a strict but fair father of the people. He was endowed with not only secular, but also spiritual power over his “children”. S. Radić perceived the totality of his own slogans as a “reborn Christian religion”, and his activity as an “apostolate” or “preaching the liberation of the peasant people”. In the late 1930s Radić’s associates, who stood at the helm of power in Banovina Croatia, had the opportunity to embody their own ideas about the optimal state structure. Practice had little in common with theory, which is something that characterised many utopian national-state projects of the interwar period. The article deals with the ideological evolution of the party, which was predonimated by the changing historical context in which it had to act. The speeches and texts of S. Radić are considered not only as an expression of a credo, but also as a utilitarian tool for the political mobilization of the masses.","PeriodicalId":30305,"journal":{"name":"Central European Political Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Political Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2619-0877.2022.5.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a tendency in Croatian historiography to present the government Stjepan Radić, who headed the Croatian (Republican) Peasants’ Party, as the forerunner of modern liberal democracy. The argument is the so-called Constitution of the Neutral Peasant Republic (1921), which provided for universal suffrage, government responsibility to the representative body, separation of powers, and so on. However, its other provisions do not align well with liberalism and, in general, with “modern” ideas about the state-legal structure. The Constitution should be viewed not as a draft law, but as a propaganda tool that appealed to the patriarchal-traditional views of the target audience. The state appeared as an enlarged model of a “peasant’s house” or “zadruga”, at the head of which was a strict but fair father of the people. He was endowed with not only secular, but also spiritual power over his “children”. S. Radić perceived the totality of his own slogans as a “reborn Christian religion”, and his activity as an “apostolate” or “preaching the liberation of the peasant people”. In the late 1930s Radić’s associates, who stood at the helm of power in Banovina Croatia, had the opportunity to embody their own ideas about the optimal state structure. Practice had little in common with theory, which is something that characterised many utopian national-state projects of the interwar period. The article deals with the ideological evolution of the party, which was predonimated by the changing historical context in which it had to act. The speeches and texts of S. Radić are considered not only as an expression of a credo, but also as a utilitarian tool for the political mobilization of the masses.
《克罗地亚中立农民共和国宪法》(1921)中的权力形象
克罗地亚史学中有一种倾向,将领导克罗地亚(共和党)农民党的斯蒂潘·拉迪奇(Stjepan radiki)政府视为现代自由民主的先驱。这个论点是所谓的中立农民共和国宪法(1921年),它规定了普选权,政府对代表机构负责,三权分立等等。然而,它的其他条款并不符合自由主义,总的来说,也不符合关于国家法律结构的“现代”思想。《宪法》不应被视为一项法律草案,而应被视为一种宣传工具,吸引目标受众的父权传统观点。国家以“农民之家”或“zadruga”的扩大模型出现,其首脑是一位严格但公正的人民之父。他不仅被赋予了世俗的权力,而且还被赋予了对他的“孩子们”的精神权力。S. radiki认为他自己的口号总体上是“重生的基督教”,他的活动是“使徒”或“宣扬农民的解放”。在20世纪30年代末,拉迪奇的同事们,在巴诺维纳克罗地亚掌权,有机会体现他们自己关于最佳国家结构的想法。实践与理论几乎没有共同之处,这是两次世界大战期间许多乌托邦式民族国家计划的特征。这篇文章论述了共产党思想上的演变,这种演变主要是由它必须在其中行动的不断变化的历史背景决定的。拉迪奇的演讲和文本不仅被认为是一种信条的表达,而且被认为是政治动员群众的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信