The Effect of Height on Adverse Short-Term Outcomes After Lower-Extremity Bypass Surgery in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 3 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geophysics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.7547/21-258
Kushkaran Kaur, Rhonda S Cornell, Lawrence Oresanya, Andrew J Meyr
{"title":"The Effect of Height on Adverse Short-Term Outcomes After Lower-Extremity Bypass Surgery in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Kushkaran Kaur, Rhonda S Cornell, Lawrence Oresanya, Andrew J Meyr","doi":"10.7547/21-258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated adverse short-term outcomes after open lower-extremity bypass surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus with a comparison performed based on patient height.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed to select patients with Current Procedural Terminology codes 35533, 35540, 35556, 35558, 35565, 35566, 35570, and 35571 and with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. This resulted in 83 patients 60 inches or less in height, 1,084 between 60 and 72 inches, and 211 patients 72 inches and taller.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed among groups with respect to the development of a superficial surgical site infection (9.6% versus 6.4% versus 5.7%; P = .458), deep incisional infection (1.2% versus 1.4% versus 2.8%; P = .289), sepsis (2.4% versus 2.0% versus 2.8%; P = .751), unplanned reoperation (19.3% versus 15.6% versus 21.8%; P = .071), or unplanned hospital readmission (19.3% versus 14.8% versus 17.1%; P = .573). A significant difference was observed among groups in the development of a wound disruption (4.8% versus 1.3% versus 4.7%; P = .001). A multivariate regression analysis was performed of the wound disruption outcome with the variables of age, sex, race, ethnicity, height, weight, current smoker, and open wound/wound infection. Race (P = .025) and weight (P = .003) were found to be independently associated with wound disruption, but height was not (P = .701).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this investigation demonstrate no significant differences in short-term adverse outcomes after lower-extremity bypass surgery based on patient height.</p>","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/21-258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated adverse short-term outcomes after open lower-extremity bypass surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus with a comparison performed based on patient height.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed to select patients with Current Procedural Terminology codes 35533, 35540, 35556, 35558, 35565, 35566, 35570, and 35571 and with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. This resulted in 83 patients 60 inches or less in height, 1,084 between 60 and 72 inches, and 211 patients 72 inches and taller.

Results: No differences were observed among groups with respect to the development of a superficial surgical site infection (9.6% versus 6.4% versus 5.7%; P = .458), deep incisional infection (1.2% versus 1.4% versus 2.8%; P = .289), sepsis (2.4% versus 2.0% versus 2.8%; P = .751), unplanned reoperation (19.3% versus 15.6% versus 21.8%; P = .071), or unplanned hospital readmission (19.3% versus 14.8% versus 17.1%; P = .573). A significant difference was observed among groups in the development of a wound disruption (4.8% versus 1.3% versus 4.7%; P = .001). A multivariate regression analysis was performed of the wound disruption outcome with the variables of age, sex, race, ethnicity, height, weight, current smoker, and open wound/wound infection. Race (P = .025) and weight (P = .003) were found to be independently associated with wound disruption, but height was not (P = .701).

Conclusions: The results of this investigation demonstrate no significant differences in short-term adverse outcomes after lower-extremity bypass surgery based on patient height.

身高对糖尿病患者下肢搭桥手术后短期不良后果的影响
背景:我们评估了糖尿病患者开放性下肢搭桥手术后的短期不良后果,并根据患者身高进行了比较:我们对美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库进行了分析,选择了当前手术术语代码为 35533、35540、35556、35558、35565、35566、35570 和 35571 且诊断为糖尿病的患者。结果显示,身高在 60 英寸或以下的患者有 83 人,60 至 72 英寸的患者有 1,084 人,72 英寸及以上的患者有 211 人:结果:在发生浅表手术部位感染(9.6% 对 6.4% 对 5.7%; P = .458)、深部切口感染(1.2% 对 1.4% 对 2.8%;P = .289)、败血症(2.4% 对 2.0% 对 2.8%;P = .751)、计划外再次手术(19.3% 对 15.6% 对 21.8%;P = .071)或计划外再次入院(19.3% 对 14.8% 对 17.1%;P = .573)。在出现伤口破坏方面,各组之间存在明显差异(4.8% 对 1.3% 对 4.7%;P = .001)。将伤口破坏结果与年龄、性别、种族、民族、身高、体重、目前是否吸烟以及开放性伤口/伤口感染等变量进行了多变量回归分析。结果发现,种族(P = .025)和体重(P = .003)与伤口破坏有独立关联,但身高与伤口破坏无关(P = .701):结论:这项调查结果表明,下肢搭桥手术后的短期不良预后与患者身高无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysics
Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics. Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research. Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring. The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信