Focus or Neglect on Cognitive Impairment Following the History of Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 MINERALOGY
Mineralogical Magazine Pub Date : 2023-02-15 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.3390/neurosci4010008
Ugo Nocentini
{"title":"Focus or Neglect on Cognitive Impairment Following the History of Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Ugo Nocentini","doi":"10.3390/neurosci4010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive disorders are now considered an integral part of the picture of multiple sclerosis. If we trace the history of the accounts of this disease, from the early descriptions by Jean-Martin Charcot, the first to provide systematic characteristics of multiple sclerosis, to present-day accounts, reports of cognitive disturbances have demonstrated an alternating trend. Cognitive disturbances were identified in the beginning, quite clearly for the times. Then, for a long time, they were considered infrequent or attributed to other factors. Finally, since the 1980s, cognitive disturbances have been the subject of increasingly in-depth studies, and are currently assumed to be a very important consequence of multiple sclerosis. In this work, the history of the description of cognitive disorders of multiple sclerosis will be retraced by analyzing the possible reasons for the differences in attention they have received over time. It emerged from the analysis that, as in the case of other pathologies, various factors have influenced how cognitive disorders have been taken into consideration. Some of these factors are inherent to the very nature of the cognitive impairments present in multiple sclerosis; others are linked to historical periods, or to the different ways of approaching the analysis of the phenomena caused by a disease. The reflections made on these topics should, among other things, increase our awareness of how scientific investigation is invariably placed in the historical context in which it is carried out.</p>","PeriodicalId":18618,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogical Magazine","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogical Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci4010008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MINERALOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive disorders are now considered an integral part of the picture of multiple sclerosis. If we trace the history of the accounts of this disease, from the early descriptions by Jean-Martin Charcot, the first to provide systematic characteristics of multiple sclerosis, to present-day accounts, reports of cognitive disturbances have demonstrated an alternating trend. Cognitive disturbances were identified in the beginning, quite clearly for the times. Then, for a long time, they were considered infrequent or attributed to other factors. Finally, since the 1980s, cognitive disturbances have been the subject of increasingly in-depth studies, and are currently assumed to be a very important consequence of multiple sclerosis. In this work, the history of the description of cognitive disorders of multiple sclerosis will be retraced by analyzing the possible reasons for the differences in attention they have received over time. It emerged from the analysis that, as in the case of other pathologies, various factors have influenced how cognitive disorders have been taken into consideration. Some of these factors are inherent to the very nature of the cognitive impairments present in multiple sclerosis; others are linked to historical periods, or to the different ways of approaching the analysis of the phenomena caused by a disease. The reflections made on these topics should, among other things, increase our awareness of how scientific investigation is invariably placed in the historical context in which it is carried out.

关注或忽视多发性硬化病史后的认知障碍。
认知障碍现在被认为是多发性硬化症的一个组成部分。如果我们追溯这一疾病的历史,从让-马丁-沙尔科(Jean-Martin Charcot,第一个系统描述多发性硬化症特征的人)的早期描述到今天的描述,关于认知障碍的报告呈现出一种交替的趋势。认知障碍在一开始就被发现了,这在当时是非常明显的。然后,在很长一段时间里,人们认为认知障碍并不常见,或将其归咎于其他因素。最后,自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,认知障碍成为越来越多深入研究的主题,目前被认为是多发性硬化症的一个非常重要的后果。本文将通过分析多发性硬化症认知障碍在不同时期受到不同关注的可能原因,追溯多发性硬化症认知障碍的描述历史。分析结果表明,与其他病症的情况一样,各种因素对认知障碍的考虑方式产生了影响。其中一些因素是多发性硬化症认知障碍的固有性质所决定的;另一些因素则与历史时期或分析疾病现象的不同方法有关。对这些问题的思考,除其他外,应使我们进一步认识到科学研究是如何无一例外地置于其开展的历史背景中的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mineralogical Magazine
Mineralogical Magazine 地学-矿物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
25.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mineralogical Magazine is an international journal of mineral sciences which covers the fields of mineralogy, crystallography, geochemistry, petrology, environmental geology and economic geology. The journal has been published continuously since the founding of the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland in 1876 and is a leading journal in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信