Modified Capsulorhexis vs. Envelope Capsulotomy in Extracapsular Cataract Surgery

P.M. Haigh, N.E. Habib, A.J.W. King, D.B. David, D.I. Clark
{"title":"Modified Capsulorhexis vs. Envelope Capsulotomy in Extracapsular Cataract Surgery","authors":"P.M. Haigh,&nbsp;N.E. Habib,&nbsp;A.J.W. King,&nbsp;D.B. David,&nbsp;D.I. Clark","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80422-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the effect of a modified capsulorhexis technique on the degree of intraocular lens (IOL) centration in patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). Patients were randomized to have envelope capsulotomy (EC) in group 1 or a continuous circular capsulorhexis (CCC) with 1 relieving anterior capsule incision at 11 o'clock in group 2. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Liverpool, District general hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Observed mean optic decentration and maintenance of capsular fixation in both groups after a mean of 12.7 months follow-up. RESULTS: Mean optic decentration was 0.51 mm in group 1(26 eyes) as compared to 0.19 mm in group 2 (28 eyes). This was statistically significant (2-sample <em>t</em>-test, <em>t</em> = 3.045, 38 d.f., <em>P</em> = 0.0042). Loss of capsular fixation was observed in 5 eyes (20%) in group 1 where a haptic migrated superiorly out of the capsular bag. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent IOL centration is achieved by using this modified CCC technique. A relieving incision prevents inadvertent intracapsular delivery of the lens and the superior location of the incision facilitates ‘in-the-bag’ placement of the IOL with the haptics orientated to the 3 and 9 o'clock positions. This safe modified CCC technique is well suited for routine ECCE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 5","pages":"Pages 291-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80422-4","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113804224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the effect of a modified capsulorhexis technique on the degree of intraocular lens (IOL) centration in patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). Patients were randomized to have envelope capsulotomy (EC) in group 1 or a continuous circular capsulorhexis (CCC) with 1 relieving anterior capsule incision at 11 o'clock in group 2. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Liverpool, District general hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Observed mean optic decentration and maintenance of capsular fixation in both groups after a mean of 12.7 months follow-up. RESULTS: Mean optic decentration was 0.51 mm in group 1(26 eyes) as compared to 0.19 mm in group 2 (28 eyes). This was statistically significant (2-sample t-test, t = 3.045, 38 d.f., P = 0.0042). Loss of capsular fixation was observed in 5 eyes (20%) in group 1 where a haptic migrated superiorly out of the capsular bag. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent IOL centration is achieved by using this modified CCC technique. A relieving incision prevents inadvertent intracapsular delivery of the lens and the superior location of the incision facilitates ‘in-the-bag’ placement of the IOL with the haptics orientated to the 3 and 9 o'clock positions. This safe modified CCC technique is well suited for routine ECCE.

改良撕囊术与囊膜切开术在白内障囊外手术中的应用
目的:前瞻性评价改良撕囊术对白内障囊外摘出(ECCE)患者人工晶状体(IOL)集中程度的影响。患者被随机分为两组,一组为包膜囊切开术(EC),另一组为连续圆形撕囊术(CCC),并在11点钟位置切开1个缓解前包膜。研究设计:前瞻性研究。周边环境:利物浦地区总医院。主要观察指标:两组平均随访12.7个月后,观察到平均视力差和囊膜固定维持。结果:1组(26眼)平均视差0.51 mm, 2组(28眼)平均视差0.19 mm。这具有统计学意义(2样本t检验,t = 3.045, 38 d.f, P = 0.0042)。第1组有5只眼(20%)的触觉从囊袋上移出,囊袋固定丢失。结论:采用改良的CCC技术可获得良好的人工晶状体定位。减压切口可防止晶状体在囊内的意外植入,切口的优越位置有助于将人工晶状体放置在“袋内”,触觉定位在3点钟和9点钟位置。这种安全的改良CCC技术非常适合常规ECCE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信