Genetic Differentiation among Livestock Breeds-Values for Fst.

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Stephen J G Hall
{"title":"Genetic Differentiation among Livestock Breeds-Values for F<sub>st</sub>.","authors":"Stephen J G Hall","doi":"10.3390/ani12091115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: The F<sub>st</sub> statistic is widely used to characterize between-breed relationships. F<sub>st</sub> = 0.1 has frequently been taken as indicating genetic distinctiveness between breeds. This study investigates whether this is justified. (2) Methods: A database was created of 35,080 breed pairs and their corresponding F<sub>st</sub> values, deduced from microsatellite and SNP studies covering cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and chickens. Overall, 6560 (19%) of breed pairs were between breeds located in the same country, 7395 (21%) between breeds of different countries within the same region, 20,563 (59%) between breeds located far apart, and 562 (1%) between a breed and the supposed wild ancestor of the species. (3) Results: General values for between-breed F<sub>st</sub> were as follows, cattle: microsatellite 0.06-0.12, SNP 0.08-0.15; sheep: microsatellite 0.06-0.10, SNP 0.06-0.17; horses: microsatellite 0.04-0.11, SNP 0.08-0.12; goats: microsatellite 0.04-0.14, SNP 0.08-0.16; pigs: microsatellite 0.06-0.27, SNP 0.15-0.22; chickens: microsatellite 0.05-0.28, SNP 0.08-0.26. (4) Conclusions: (1) Large amounts of F<sub>st</sub> data are available for a substantial proportion of the world's livestock breeds, (2) the value for between-breed F<sub>st</sub> of 0.1 is not appropriate owing to its considerable variability, and (3) accumulated F<sub>st</sub> data may have value for interdisciplinary research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44784,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: The Fst statistic is widely used to characterize between-breed relationships. Fst = 0.1 has frequently been taken as indicating genetic distinctiveness between breeds. This study investigates whether this is justified. (2) Methods: A database was created of 35,080 breed pairs and their corresponding Fst values, deduced from microsatellite and SNP studies covering cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and chickens. Overall, 6560 (19%) of breed pairs were between breeds located in the same country, 7395 (21%) between breeds of different countries within the same region, 20,563 (59%) between breeds located far apart, and 562 (1%) between a breed and the supposed wild ancestor of the species. (3) Results: General values for between-breed Fst were as follows, cattle: microsatellite 0.06-0.12, SNP 0.08-0.15; sheep: microsatellite 0.06-0.10, SNP 0.06-0.17; horses: microsatellite 0.04-0.11, SNP 0.08-0.12; goats: microsatellite 0.04-0.14, SNP 0.08-0.16; pigs: microsatellite 0.06-0.27, SNP 0.15-0.22; chickens: microsatellite 0.05-0.28, SNP 0.08-0.26. (4) Conclusions: (1) Large amounts of Fst data are available for a substantial proportion of the world's livestock breeds, (2) the value for between-breed Fst of 0.1 is not appropriate owing to its considerable variability, and (3) accumulated Fst data may have value for interdisciplinary research.

家畜品种间的遗传差异--Fst.Fst.Fst.Fst.Fst.Fst.Fst.Fst.
(1) 背景:Fst 统计量被广泛用于描述品种间的关系。Fst = 0.1 经常被认为表示品种间的遗传差异。本研究探讨了这一观点是否合理。(2) 方法:通过对牛、绵羊、山羊、猪、马和鸡的微卫星和 SNP 研究,建立了一个包含 35080 个品种对及其相应 Fst 值的数据库。总体而言,6560 对(19%)品种配对发生在同一国家的不同品种之间,7395 对(21%)发生在同一地区不同国家的不同品种之间,20563 对(59%)发生在相距甚远的不同品种之间,562 对(1%)发生在一个品种与该物种假定的野生祖先之间。(3) 结果:牛:微卫星 0.06-0.12,SNP 0.08-0.15;羊:微卫星 0.06-0.10,SNP 0.06-0.17;马:微卫星 0.04-0.11,SNP 0.08-0.12;山羊:微卫星 0.04-0.14,SNP 0.08-0.16;猪:微卫星 0.06-0.27,SNP 0.15-0.22;鸡:微卫星 0.05-0.28,SNP 0.08-0.26。(4) 结论:(1)世界上相当一部分家畜品种都有大量的 Fst 数据;(2)由于家畜品种间的变异性很大,品种间 Fst 值为 0.1 并不合适;(3)积累的 Fst 数据可能对跨学科研究有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信