Corporate Bondholder Reactions to Bank Loan Covenant Violations and the Evolution of Bank Loan Covenants

Yuqian Wang, C. Chiu, Shu-ling Wu
{"title":"Corporate Bondholder Reactions to Bank Loan Covenant Violations and the Evolution of Bank Loan Covenants","authors":"Yuqian Wang, C. Chiu, Shu-ling Wu","doi":"10.5430/afr.v11n3p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines firms’ corporate bond price reactions to bank loan covenant violations. Using an event study approach, we find that firms’ bond price response is marginally negative in the 1990s and becomes significantly positive in the 2000s. The positive bond price reactions suggest bondholders benefit from bank loan covenant violations in more recent years. Specifically, bank loan covenant violations enable banks to step in and take necessary actions to protect creditors’ interests, which benefit not only private lenders but also public corporate bondholders. In addition, the temporal change in bond price response suggests the disciplining role of bank loan covenants becomes increasingly important in recent years: banks gradually take debt covenants as “trip wires”, which give banks an option to take necessary actions when the early warning signal shows up through covenant violations. Furthermore, we find that bondholders and stockholder reactions are positively correlated in recent years, and that managerial entrenchment could decrease banks’ influence after violations.","PeriodicalId":34570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v11n3p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines firms’ corporate bond price reactions to bank loan covenant violations. Using an event study approach, we find that firms’ bond price response is marginally negative in the 1990s and becomes significantly positive in the 2000s. The positive bond price reactions suggest bondholders benefit from bank loan covenant violations in more recent years. Specifically, bank loan covenant violations enable banks to step in and take necessary actions to protect creditors’ interests, which benefit not only private lenders but also public corporate bondholders. In addition, the temporal change in bond price response suggests the disciplining role of bank loan covenants becomes increasingly important in recent years: banks gradually take debt covenants as “trip wires”, which give banks an option to take necessary actions when the early warning signal shows up through covenant violations. Furthermore, we find that bondholders and stockholder reactions are positively correlated in recent years, and that managerial entrenchment could decrease banks’ influence after violations.
公司债券持有人对银行贷款契约违约的反应及银行贷款契约的演变
本文考察了公司债券价格对银行贷款契约违约的反应。使用事件研究方法,我们发现公司的债券价格反应在20世纪90年代是微负的,在21世纪初变得显著正。债券价格的积极反应表明,债券持有人受益于近年来违反银行贷款契约的行为。具体来说,银行贷款契约的违反使银行能够介入并采取必要的行动来保护债权人的利益,这不仅有利于私人贷款人,也有利于上市公司的债券持有人。此外,债券价格反应的时间变化表明,银行贷款契约的约束作用近年来变得越来越重要:银行逐渐将债务契约视为“绊线”,当违约行为出现预警信号时,银行可以选择采取必要的行动。此外,我们发现近年来债券持有人和股东的反应正相关,并且管理堑壕可能会降低违规后银行的影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信