Introducing ropivacaine into a department's epidural analgesic practice. Improving acute pain service practice.

T. Towell, S. Maric, M. Jones, R. Wyatt, D. Duthie
{"title":"Introducing ropivacaine into a department's epidural analgesic practice. Improving acute pain service practice.","authors":"T. Towell, S. Maric, M. Jones, R. Wyatt, D. Duthie","doi":"10.1108/14664100010361836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of introducing a new licensed local anaesthetic drug, ropivacaine, into routine practice were evaluated by measuring the efficacy and adverse effects of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (R), or the mixtures in current use: fentanyl 5 (micrograms/ml with bupivacaine 1 mg/ml (BF5) and fentanyl 10 (micrograms/ml) with bupivacaine 1 mg/ml (BF10). All patients were nursed on general wards after surgery. For two months, 102 consecutive patients were studied. Pain scores at rest were significantly better in the fentanyl and bupivacaine groups, (mean rank R: 35.5, BF5: 22.7, BF10: 26.9, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between patient controlled boluses and pain at rest and (p < 0.001), and pain on moving (p < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting was worse in the BF10 (p < 0.05). Older patients demanded less analgesia (p < 0.001). Postoperatively BF5 provided better pain relief with trends demonstrating fewer side-effects and complications than BF10 or R. We now use fentanyl 5 (micrograms/ml and bupivacaine 1 mg/ml as our standard epidural infusion mixture.","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"2013 1","pages":"217-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100010361836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The results of introducing a new licensed local anaesthetic drug, ropivacaine, into routine practice were evaluated by measuring the efficacy and adverse effects of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (R), or the mixtures in current use: fentanyl 5 (micrograms/ml with bupivacaine 1 mg/ml (BF5) and fentanyl 10 (micrograms/ml) with bupivacaine 1 mg/ml (BF10). All patients were nursed on general wards after surgery. For two months, 102 consecutive patients were studied. Pain scores at rest were significantly better in the fentanyl and bupivacaine groups, (mean rank R: 35.5, BF5: 22.7, BF10: 26.9, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between patient controlled boluses and pain at rest and (p < 0.001), and pain on moving (p < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting was worse in the BF10 (p < 0.05). Older patients demanded less analgesia (p < 0.001). Postoperatively BF5 provided better pain relief with trends demonstrating fewer side-effects and complications than BF10 or R. We now use fentanyl 5 (micrograms/ml and bupivacaine 1 mg/ml as our standard epidural infusion mixture.
将罗哌卡因引入科室硬膜外镇痛实践。改善急性疼痛服务实践。
通过测量患者控制硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)、使用罗哌卡因2 mg/ml (R)或目前使用的芬太尼5(微克/毫升布比卡因1 mg/ml (BF5)和芬太尼10(微克/毫升)与布比卡因1 mg/ml (BF10)的混合物的疗效和不良反应,评估了将新许可的局部麻醉药物罗哌卡因引入常规实践的结果。所有患者术后均在普通病房护理。在两个月的时间里,102名患者被连续研究。芬太尼组和布比卡因组静息疼痛评分显著高于对照组(平均R = 35.5, BF5 = 22.7, BF10 = 26.9, P < 0.05)。患者控制剂量与静止疼痛(p < 0.001)和运动疼痛(p < 0.001)有显著相关性。BF10组恶心呕吐加重(p < 0.05)。老年患者需要较少的镇痛(p < 0.001)。术后BF5比BF10或r提供了更好的疼痛缓解,副作用和并发症的趋势更少。我们现在使用芬太尼5(微克/毫升)和布比卡因1毫克/毫升作为我们的标准硬膜外输液混合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信