Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Staged FIGO IA G1/G2 Endometrial Cancer With a Tumor Size of More Than 2 cm.

Gokhan Boyraz, Mehmet Coskun Salman, Murat Gultekin, Derman Basaran, Murat Cagan, Nejat Ozgul, Kunter Yuce
{"title":"Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Staged FIGO IA G1/G2 Endometrial Cancer With a Tumor Size of More Than 2 cm.","authors":"Gokhan Boyraz, Mehmet Coskun Salman, Murat Gultekin, Derman Basaran, Murat Cagan, Nejat Ozgul, Kunter Yuce","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to investigate effect of tumor size on lymphatic spread in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients with EC who underwent staging surgery with systematic lymphadenectomy between 2002 and 2015 at the Hacettepe University Hospital. Patients with grade 1 or 2 endometrioid type tumor who had 50% or lower myometrial invasion were included. Patients who had no myometrial invasion or had uterine high-risk features (nonendometrioid histology, grade 3, and deep myometrial invasion) were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group consisted of 191 patients, and the mean age of the patients was 57.8 years. Of these patients, 124 (64.9%) had tumor size of more than 2 cm and 67 (35.1%) had tumor size of 2 cm or less. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 12 (9.7%) of the 124 patients with tumor size of more than 2 cm. On the other hand, none of the 67 patients (0%) with tumor size of 2 cm or less was found to have lymphatic involvement. Of the factors analyzed for correlation with lymph node metastasis in patients with low-risk EC, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and primary tumor size were found to be significant predictors of lymphatic spread in univariate analysis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor size (odds ratio, 6.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.007-infinite; P < 0.05) and LVSI (odds ratio, 14.261; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-59.6; P < 0.001) were 2 independent predictors associated with lymphatic involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our trial supports that tumor size of more than 2 cm and LVSI are 2 independent factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with low-risk EC. Both factors can be used together to select patients with traditional low-risk histologic features who would absolutely benefit from lymph node dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"3 1","pages":"486-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to investigate effect of tumor size on lymphatic spread in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods: This study included patients with EC who underwent staging surgery with systematic lymphadenectomy between 2002 and 2015 at the Hacettepe University Hospital. Patients with grade 1 or 2 endometrioid type tumor who had 50% or lower myometrial invasion were included. Patients who had no myometrial invasion or had uterine high-risk features (nonendometrioid histology, grade 3, and deep myometrial invasion) were excluded.

Results: The study group consisted of 191 patients, and the mean age of the patients was 57.8 years. Of these patients, 124 (64.9%) had tumor size of more than 2 cm and 67 (35.1%) had tumor size of 2 cm or less. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 12 (9.7%) of the 124 patients with tumor size of more than 2 cm. On the other hand, none of the 67 patients (0%) with tumor size of 2 cm or less was found to have lymphatic involvement. Of the factors analyzed for correlation with lymph node metastasis in patients with low-risk EC, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and primary tumor size were found to be significant predictors of lymphatic spread in univariate analysis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor size (odds ratio, 6.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.007-infinite; P < 0.05) and LVSI (odds ratio, 14.261; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-59.6; P < 0.001) were 2 independent predictors associated with lymphatic involvement.

Conclusions: Our trial supports that tumor size of more than 2 cm and LVSI are 2 independent factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with low-risk EC. Both factors can be used together to select patients with traditional low-risk histologic features who would absolutely benefit from lymph node dissection.

FIGO IA G1/G2肿瘤大小大于2cm的子宫内膜癌手术分期淋巴结转移的发生率
目的:探讨肿瘤大小对低危子宫内膜癌(EC)患者淋巴扩散的影响。方法:本研究纳入2002年至2015年在Hacettepe大学医院接受分期手术系统性淋巴结切除术的EC患者。1级或2级子宫内膜样肿瘤患者包括50%或更低的子宫内膜浸润。没有子宫内膜浸润或有子宫高危特征(非子宫内膜样组织学,3级,深部子宫内膜浸润)的患者被排除在外。结果:研究组共191例患者,平均年龄57.8岁。其中肿瘤大小大于2 cm的124例(64.9%),小于或等于2 cm的67例(35.1%)。124例肿瘤大小大于2 cm的患者中有12例(9.7%)存在淋巴结转移。另一方面,67例(0%)肿瘤大小在2cm或以下的患者中没有发现淋巴受累。在分析与低危EC患者淋巴结转移相关的因素中,单因素分析发现淋巴血管腔浸润(LVSI)和原发肿瘤大小是淋巴转移的显著预测因子(P < 0.001和P = 0.009)。在多变量分析中,肿瘤大小(优势比,6.86;95%置信区间,1.007-无穷大;P < 0.05)和LVSI(优势比14.261;95%置信区间为3.4-59.6;P < 0.001)是与淋巴受累相关的2个独立预测因子。结论:我们的试验支持肿瘤大小大于2cm和LVSI是低危EC患者淋巴结转移的两个独立因素。这两个因素可以一起用于选择具有传统低风险组织学特征的患者,这些患者绝对受益于淋巴结清扫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书