Medical Negliegence and Liability of Health Professionals in the European Court of Human Rights Case Law

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Jasna Murgel
{"title":"Medical Negliegence and Liability of Health Professionals in the European Court of Human Rights Case Law","authors":"Jasna Murgel","doi":"10.18690/mls.13.1.21-44.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) does not explicitly lay down the right to health, it can be derived from the long-term jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) which interpreted certain provisions of the ECHR (in particular articles concerning the right to life, the prohibition of torture and inhuman conduct and the right to private and family life). Based on the ECtHR jurisprudence it may be concluded that the ECHR, albeit implicitly, refers to the right to health as well. It regulates negative obligations reflected in the prohibition of interference with a certain right. It can also be interpreted as setting positive obligations of the states to ensure the exercise of the right to health, although the extent of that positive obligation is still not fully defined. The present contribution focuses on a single segment of the right to health in the practice of the ECtHR, i.e. the Court’s interpretation of the state’s responsibility for medical negligence, especially in the last few years.","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"14 1","pages":"21-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/mls.13.1.21-44.2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) does not explicitly lay down the right to health, it can be derived from the long-term jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) which interpreted certain provisions of the ECHR (in particular articles concerning the right to life, the prohibition of torture and inhuman conduct and the right to private and family life). Based on the ECtHR jurisprudence it may be concluded that the ECHR, albeit implicitly, refers to the right to health as well. It regulates negative obligations reflected in the prohibition of interference with a certain right. It can also be interpreted as setting positive obligations of the states to ensure the exercise of the right to health, although the extent of that positive obligation is still not fully defined. The present contribution focuses on a single segment of the right to health in the practice of the ECtHR, i.e. the Court’s interpretation of the state’s responsibility for medical negligence, especially in the last few years.
欧洲人权判例法法院中医疗专业人员的医疗过失和责任
虽然《欧洲人权公约》没有明确规定健康权,但它可以从欧洲人权法院的长期判例中得出,欧洲人权法院解释了《欧洲人权公约》的某些条款(特别是关于生命权、禁止酷刑和不人道行为以及私人和家庭生活权的条款)。根据欧洲人权法院的判例,可以得出结论,欧洲人权法院虽然含蓄地也提到了健康权。它规定了消极义务,反映在禁止干涉某一权利上。它也可以被解释为规定了国家确保行使健康权的积极义务,尽管这种积极义务的范围仍未得到充分界定。本部分侧重于欧洲人权法院实践中健康权的一个部分,即法院对国家对医疗过失责任的解释,特别是在过去几年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信