Studying Quality Characteristics of Flax Fiber Depending on Deseeding Device Design

A. Galkin, D. Fadeev, I. Uschapovsky
{"title":"Studying Quality Characteristics of Flax Fiber Depending on Deseeding Device Design","authors":"A. Galkin, D. Fadeev, I. Uschapovsky","doi":"10.15507/0236-2910.028.201803.389-399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The processe of harvesting fiber flax is characterized by tough interactions of the work tools of the flax puller and parts of plants. Different principles and design of work tools for taking out seed bolls from the stem, used in flax harvesting machines, have both advantages and disadvantages. Single-drum comb deseeders are the most effective, but the level of damage to the stems caused during the working of these mechanisms is high. The purpose of this work is the experimental substantiation of constructive changes in the comb deseeder, which allows reducing damage to the stems of the flax fiber in the process of combing and improving the quality of the flax material. \nMaterials and Methods. Fields and laboratories studies of flax harvesting and technological tests of flax straw and fiber were carried out according to the existing methods and standard protocols (GOST). The influence of the harvesting combine speed and deseeder type (the drum for the taking flax balls off by the stems’ combing and for the transporting removed balls to hopper) on the yield and quality of the fiber were determined. The fiber flax variety Alexim (cultivated by All Russian Research Institute for Flax Production, Torzhok) was used as a plant object and the harvesting was carried out in the vegetation stage “yellow stem” – “full ripeness”. \nResults. The classical design of the combing drum with four ridges for deseeding was changed to three ones that means only one of ridges should be in the layer of flax stems during the combing process. That design could decrease damage to the stems when deseeding stems. Instrumental assessment of fiber shows that after the deseeding by the threeridges drum the quality of flax straw was 0.97–1.09 numbers that was by 0.19–0.28 numbers higher than after using four-ridges drums. \nConclusions. The obtained data indicate that the reducing of the load on the flax stems has a positive effect on the quality of the fibrous products. The yield of long fiber increases by 1.27–1.54% (abs.), and the fiber quality – by 0.3 numbers.","PeriodicalId":53930,"journal":{"name":"Mordovia University Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mordovia University Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/0236-2910.028.201803.389-399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction. The processe of harvesting fiber flax is characterized by tough interactions of the work tools of the flax puller and parts of plants. Different principles and design of work tools for taking out seed bolls from the stem, used in flax harvesting machines, have both advantages and disadvantages. Single-drum comb deseeders are the most effective, but the level of damage to the stems caused during the working of these mechanisms is high. The purpose of this work is the experimental substantiation of constructive changes in the comb deseeder, which allows reducing damage to the stems of the flax fiber in the process of combing and improving the quality of the flax material. Materials and Methods. Fields and laboratories studies of flax harvesting and technological tests of flax straw and fiber were carried out according to the existing methods and standard protocols (GOST). The influence of the harvesting combine speed and deseeder type (the drum for the taking flax balls off by the stems’ combing and for the transporting removed balls to hopper) on the yield and quality of the fiber were determined. The fiber flax variety Alexim (cultivated by All Russian Research Institute for Flax Production, Torzhok) was used as a plant object and the harvesting was carried out in the vegetation stage “yellow stem” – “full ripeness”. Results. The classical design of the combing drum with four ridges for deseeding was changed to three ones that means only one of ridges should be in the layer of flax stems during the combing process. That design could decrease damage to the stems when deseeding stems. Instrumental assessment of fiber shows that after the deseeding by the threeridges drum the quality of flax straw was 0.97–1.09 numbers that was by 0.19–0.28 numbers higher than after using four-ridges drums. Conclusions. The obtained data indicate that the reducing of the load on the flax stems has a positive effect on the quality of the fibrous products. The yield of long fiber increases by 1.27–1.54% (abs.), and the fiber quality – by 0.3 numbers.
基于脱籽装置设计的亚麻纤维品质特性研究
介绍。收获亚麻纤维的过程的特点是艰难的相互作用的工作工具的麻拔和植物的部分。在亚麻收获机上,从茎部取出种铃的工作工具的原理和设计不同,既有优点,也有缺点。单滚筒梳式除颤器是最有效的,但在这些机构工作期间对茎部造成的损害程度很高。本研究的目的是对梳式除草机的建设性变化进行实验验证,以减少在梳理过程中对亚麻纤维茎部的损伤,提高亚麻原料的质量。材料与方法。根据现有方法和标准协议(GOST)进行了亚麻收获和亚麻秸秆和纤维技术试验的实地和实验室研究。测定了采收联合速度和除草机类型(亚麻茎精梳取球滚筒和卸球滚筒)对纤维产量和品质的影响。以纤维亚麻品种Alexim(由托尔若克全俄亚麻生产研究所栽培)作为植物对象,在“黄茎”-“完全成熟”的植被阶段进行采收。结果。将传统的四棱精梳鼓改为三棱精梳鼓,即在精梳过程中,亚麻茎层中只需要有一棱。这种设计可以减少在去籽时对茎的损伤。纤维测定结果表明,三棱鼓除籽后的亚麻秸秆质量为0.97 ~ 1.09,比四棱鼓除籽后的亚麻秸秆质量提高0.19 ~ 0.28。结论。所得数据表明,减少亚麻茎上的负荷对纤维制品的质量有积极的影响。长纤维得率提高1.27 ~ 1.54% (abs.),纤维质量提高0.3个百分点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mordovia University Bulletin
Mordovia University Bulletin MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信