Interaction patterns: An approach for enhancing students’ retention in geometric construction

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I. J. Osakwe, F. Egara, Onyemauche Christopher Inweregbuh, A. C. Nzeadibe, Chinyere N. Emefo
{"title":"Interaction patterns: An approach for enhancing students’ retention in geometric construction","authors":"I. J. Osakwe, F. Egara, Onyemauche Christopher Inweregbuh, A. C. Nzeadibe, Chinyere N. Emefo","doi":"10.29333/iejme/12596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of interaction patterns on JS3 learners’ retention in geometric construction was investigated in Anambra State, Nigeria. The researchers used a quasi-experimental approach with a non-equivalent control group for the pre- and post-test. The population consisted of 1,813 JS3 leaners. The study’s subjects were a group of 155 JS3 learners drawn from two schools. Two JS3 classes in the schools were assigned to the experimental and control groups at random. The geometric construction retention test (GCRT) was used to collect data, and it was validated by three experts. The reliability coefficient of the GCRT was 0.80. The mean and standard deviation of the data were used to report the study’s questions, whereas the hypotheses were tested via analysis of covariance at a 0.05 level of significance. According to the findings, students taught geometric construction utilizing interaction patterns remembered more material than those taught using the expository approach. It also found a statistically significant difference in retention between urban and rural learners, favoring urban learners. The interaction effect of group and location on student retention was not significant. One recommendation of this study is that teachers should use interaction patterns as an instructional method when teaching geometric construction.","PeriodicalId":29770,"journal":{"name":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The effect of interaction patterns on JS3 learners’ retention in geometric construction was investigated in Anambra State, Nigeria. The researchers used a quasi-experimental approach with a non-equivalent control group for the pre- and post-test. The population consisted of 1,813 JS3 leaners. The study’s subjects were a group of 155 JS3 learners drawn from two schools. Two JS3 classes in the schools were assigned to the experimental and control groups at random. The geometric construction retention test (GCRT) was used to collect data, and it was validated by three experts. The reliability coefficient of the GCRT was 0.80. The mean and standard deviation of the data were used to report the study’s questions, whereas the hypotheses were tested via analysis of covariance at a 0.05 level of significance. According to the findings, students taught geometric construction utilizing interaction patterns remembered more material than those taught using the expository approach. It also found a statistically significant difference in retention between urban and rural learners, favoring urban learners. The interaction effect of group and location on student retention was not significant. One recommendation of this study is that teachers should use interaction patterns as an instructional method when teaching geometric construction.
互动模式:提高学生几何建构记忆的方法
在尼日利亚的阿南布拉州,研究了互动模式对JS3学习者几何结构记忆的影响。研究人员采用了准实验的方法,在前后测试中使用了一个非等效的对照组。总体由1,813个JS3学习者组成。研究对象是来自两所学校的155名JS3学习者。将学校的两个JS3班随机分为实验组和对照组。采用几何结构保留测验(GCRT)收集数据,并由三位专家进行验证。GCRT的信度系数为0.80。数据的均值和标准差用于报告研究的问题,而假设通过协方差分析在0.05显著性水平上进行检验。根据研究结果,使用互动模式学习几何结构的学生比使用说明性方法的学生记住了更多的材料。该研究还发现,城市和农村学习者在保留率方面存在统计学上的显著差异,有利于城市学习者。群体和地域对学生滞留的交互作用不显著。本研究的一个建议是,教师在教学几何结构时应使用互动模式作为教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信