Effect of Ageing on Morphologic and Clinical Predictors of Prostate Cancer Progression

T. Stamey, M. Raimondo, C. Yemoto, J. McNeal, I. Johnstone
{"title":"Effect of Ageing on Morphologic and Clinical Predictors of Prostate Cancer Progression","authors":"T. Stamey, M. Raimondo, C. Yemoto, J. McNeal, I. Johnstone","doi":"10.1046/J.1525-1411.2000.23011.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Autopsy studies show that prostate cancer begins in the 4th and 5th decade of life. We sought to determine if increasing age at the time of diagnosis is related to morphologic and clinical predictors of cancer progression. \n \n \n \nMaterials and Methods: We examined 7 morphologic variables known to impact progression of prostate cancer plus clinical stage and serum PSA in relation to increasing age. 981 untreated men undergoing radical prostatectomy were divided into 5 increasing age groups. Prostate size, which is known to increase with age, was used as a positive control. We compared the median and inter-quartile range for each grouping. \n \n \n \nResults: Increase in prostate weight was highly significant at all age differences. The % Gleason grade 4/5 cancer and cancer volume showed the most statistically significant changes with ageing, followed by non-organ confined cancer and capsular penetration both of which are highly correlated with cancer volume. Serum PSA was significant at 12, 17, and 22 years of age differences, but may be related more to prostate size than to increasing cancer volume. The presence of positive lymph nodes, seminal vesicle invasion, and palpable cancer were unrelated to increasing age. \n \n \n \nConclusions: With the exception of increasing prostate size, % Gleason grade 4/5 cancer and cancer volume are the most significantly related variables to increasing age. Since % Gleason grade 4/5 cancer and cancer volume are also the primary determinants of failure to cure prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy, these age related changes suggest that detection of prostate cancer later in life will be accompanied by increased amounts of high grade cancer and larger tumor volumes. They also explain why, in so many younger men (age 45–60), the largest prostate cancer is often clinically insignificant (< 0.5 cc) at the time of radical prostatectomy.","PeriodicalId":22947,"journal":{"name":"The open prostate cancer journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"157-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open prostate cancer journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1525-1411.2000.23011.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Objectives: Autopsy studies show that prostate cancer begins in the 4th and 5th decade of life. We sought to determine if increasing age at the time of diagnosis is related to morphologic and clinical predictors of cancer progression. Materials and Methods: We examined 7 morphologic variables known to impact progression of prostate cancer plus clinical stage and serum PSA in relation to increasing age. 981 untreated men undergoing radical prostatectomy were divided into 5 increasing age groups. Prostate size, which is known to increase with age, was used as a positive control. We compared the median and inter-quartile range for each grouping. Results: Increase in prostate weight was highly significant at all age differences. The % Gleason grade 4/5 cancer and cancer volume showed the most statistically significant changes with ageing, followed by non-organ confined cancer and capsular penetration both of which are highly correlated with cancer volume. Serum PSA was significant at 12, 17, and 22 years of age differences, but may be related more to prostate size than to increasing cancer volume. The presence of positive lymph nodes, seminal vesicle invasion, and palpable cancer were unrelated to increasing age. Conclusions: With the exception of increasing prostate size, % Gleason grade 4/5 cancer and cancer volume are the most significantly related variables to increasing age. Since % Gleason grade 4/5 cancer and cancer volume are also the primary determinants of failure to cure prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy, these age related changes suggest that detection of prostate cancer later in life will be accompanied by increased amounts of high grade cancer and larger tumor volumes. They also explain why, in so many younger men (age 45–60), the largest prostate cancer is often clinically insignificant (< 0.5 cc) at the time of radical prostatectomy.
衰老对前列腺癌进展的形态学和临床预测因子的影响
目的:尸检研究表明前列腺癌开始于生命的第4和第5个十年。我们试图确定在诊断时年龄的增加是否与癌症进展的形态学和临床预测因子有关。材料和方法:我们研究了7种已知的影响前列腺癌进展的形态学变量,以及与年龄增长有关的临床分期和血清PSA。981例接受根治性前列腺切除术的未经治疗的男性分为5个年龄递增组。前列腺大小随着年龄的增长而增加,被用作阳性对照。我们比较了每组的中位数和四分位数范围。结果:前列腺重量的增加在各年龄段均有显著性差异。随着年龄的增长,% Gleason 4/5级癌和癌体积的变化最具统计学意义,其次是非器官限制性癌和包膜穿透性癌,两者与癌体积高度相关。血清PSA在12岁、17岁和22岁时差异显著,但可能更多地与前列腺大小有关,而不是与癌体积增加有关。淋巴结阳性、精囊浸润和可触及癌的存在与年龄增长无关。结论:除前列腺大小增加外,% Gleason 4/5级癌和癌体积是与年龄增长最显著相关的变量。由于% Gleason 4/5级癌症和肿瘤体积也是根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌失败的主要决定因素,这些年龄相关的变化表明,在生命后期发现前列腺癌将伴随着高级别癌症数量的增加和肿瘤体积的增大。他们还解释了为什么在这么多年轻男性(45-60岁)中,在根治性前列腺切除术时,最大的前列腺癌通常在临床上不显著(< 0.5 cc)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信