Economic aspects of using new chemotherapy regimens for multidrug and extensively drugresistant tuberculosis

Q3 Medicine
А. V. Kukurika
{"title":"Economic aspects of using new chemotherapy regimens for multidrug and extensively drugresistant tuberculosis","authors":"А. V. Kukurika","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to systematize data on cost-effectiveness evaluation of new multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) chemotherapy regimens.Material and methods. An analysis of 19 publications devoted to the economic evaluation of the treatment of active MDR/XDR-TB was carried out. The literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, eLibrary for the period from January 2015 to February 2022 inclusively.Results. Economic efficiency was studied in high-, middleand low-income countries. All publications contained calculation of treatment costs, and a third of the studies also estimated additional costs. Bedaquiline, delamanid, and pretomanid regimens were included in treatment alone or compared with a background regimen. The most commonly used economic model was the Markov one. To compare primary outcomes, most studies assessed disabilityand quality-adjusted life years. The overall cost of MDR/XDR-TB treatment varied by country income level. In all cases, bedaquiline-based regimens represented a cost-effective alternative to previous treatment, showed high efficacy in MDR/XDR-TB therapy, and were more cost-effective than delamanid regimens.Conclusion. Cost-effective interventions for active MDR/XDR-TB therapy should include the introduction of new chemotherapy regimens, reduced hospital stays and decentralized treatment, which is especially relevant in countries with high tuberculosis burden.","PeriodicalId":36464,"journal":{"name":"Farmakoekonomika","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmakoekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to systematize data on cost-effectiveness evaluation of new multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) chemotherapy regimens.Material and methods. An analysis of 19 publications devoted to the economic evaluation of the treatment of active MDR/XDR-TB was carried out. The literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, eLibrary for the period from January 2015 to February 2022 inclusively.Results. Economic efficiency was studied in high-, middleand low-income countries. All publications contained calculation of treatment costs, and a third of the studies also estimated additional costs. Bedaquiline, delamanid, and pretomanid regimens were included in treatment alone or compared with a background regimen. The most commonly used economic model was the Markov one. To compare primary outcomes, most studies assessed disabilityand quality-adjusted life years. The overall cost of MDR/XDR-TB treatment varied by country income level. In all cases, bedaquiline-based regimens represented a cost-effective alternative to previous treatment, showed high efficacy in MDR/XDR-TB therapy, and were more cost-effective than delamanid regimens.Conclusion. Cost-effective interventions for active MDR/XDR-TB therapy should include the introduction of new chemotherapy regimens, reduced hospital stays and decentralized treatment, which is especially relevant in countries with high tuberculosis burden.
使用新的化疗方案治疗多药和广泛耐药结核病的经济方面
目的:对新型多药和广泛耐药结核病(MDR/XDR-TB)化疗方案的成本-效果评估数据进行系统整理。材料和方法。对19份专门对活动性耐多药/广泛耐药结核病治疗进行经济评价的出版物进行了分析。在PubMed/MEDLINE,谷歌Scholar, library电子数据库中进行文献检索,检索时间为2015年1月至2022年2月。研究了高、中、低收入国家的经济效率。所有出版物都包含治疗费用的计算,三分之一的研究还估计了额外费用。贝达喹啉、delamanid和pretomanid方案被单独纳入治疗或与背景方案进行比较。最常用的经济模型是马尔可夫模型。为了比较主要结果,大多数研究评估了残疾和质量调整生命年。耐多药/广泛耐药结核病治疗的总费用因国家收入水平而异。在所有病例中,以贝达喹啉为基础的方案代表了一种具有成本效益的替代先前治疗方案,在耐多药/广泛耐药结核病治疗中显示出高效率,并且比delamanid方案更具成本效益。积极的耐多药/广泛耐药结核病治疗的成本效益干预措施应包括采用新的化疗方案、缩短住院时间和分散治疗,这在结核病负担高的国家尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Farmakoekonomika
Farmakoekonomika Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信