Changes in peritoneal membrane with different peritoneal dialysis solutions: Is there a difference?

Abdullah Khalaf Al-Hwiesh , Mohamed A. Shawarby , Ibrahiem Saeed Abdul-Rahman , Nadia Al-Oudah , Bander Al-Dhofairy , Jose Carolino Divino-Filho , Abdalla Abdelrahman , Hazem Zakaria , Mohammad A. Nasr El-Din , Ahmed Eldamati , Tamer El-Salamony , Fahd A. Al-Muhanna
{"title":"Changes in peritoneal membrane with different peritoneal dialysis solutions: Is there a difference?","authors":"Abdullah Khalaf Al-Hwiesh ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Shawarby ,&nbsp;Ibrahiem Saeed Abdul-Rahman ,&nbsp;Nadia Al-Oudah ,&nbsp;Bander Al-Dhofairy ,&nbsp;Jose Carolino Divino-Filho ,&nbsp;Abdalla Abdelrahman ,&nbsp;Hazem Zakaria ,&nbsp;Mohammad A. Nasr El-Din ,&nbsp;Ahmed Eldamati ,&nbsp;Tamer El-Salamony ,&nbsp;Fahd A. Al-Muhanna","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjn.2016.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Purpose</h3><p>The peritoneal membrane of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is characterized by morphological and microvascular changes. It is said that lactate-based peritoneal dialysate is implicated in the development of these changes. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of long-term exposure to glucose-based, lactate-buffered (Dianeal), and biocompatible bicarbonate/lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product (Physioneal) peritoneal solutions on the peritoneal membrane.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-nine incident PD patients were randomized into two groups: 19 patients with Dianeal dialysate (Group A) and 20 with biocompatible Physioneal dialysate (Group B). All patients used automated PD for a median of 31 months in Group A and 32 months in Group B. Three biopsies at one occasion only were taken from the peritoneal membrane at the end of the study. All samples were collected and fixed in accordance with a standardized protocol, and a histopathologist blinded to the clinical status and PD solutions allocated to the patients carried out the analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The commonest change observed was peritoneal fibrosis, seen in 35 out of 39 cases (89.7%); it was moderate to severe in 28 cases (71.8%) and mild in 11 (28.2%) cases. This was followed by loss of mesothelial cells (22 cases, 56.4%), elastosis (20 cases, 51.3%), increased blood vessels (15 cases, 38.5%), thick-walled blood vessels (10 cases, 25.6%), and finally chronic inflammation and mesothelial cell hyperplasia (7 cases, 17.9%, and 6 cases, 15.4%, respectively). Of the patients with blood vessel abnormalities, 22 (88.0%) exhibited significant fibrosis and only three (12.0%) did not. Of those without blood vessel changes, only six (42.9%) patients exhibited similar degree of fibrosis (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). The prevalence of vascular changes, moderate to severe fibrosis, as well as mesothelial cell abnormalities increased as the duration of PD increased. The prevalence of fibrosis, mesothelial cell loss, and vascular abnormalities increased significantly with diabetes mellitus (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in the effects of long-term exposure to glucose-based, lactate-buffered, and biocompatible bicarbonate/lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product peritoneal solutions on the peritoneal membrane. Risk factors other than PD dialysate composition need to be considered when assessing peritoneal membrane adequacy. The factors that were proved to be significant in our study are duration of end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and time on PD.</p></div><div><h3>背景 / 目的</h3><p>在接受長期腹膜透析 (PD) 的病人間,腹膜會出現若干的形態學與微血管變化,這些變化被認為與採用乳酸鹽腹膜透析液有關。本研究旨在比較兩種透析液的長期暴露—乳酸鹽緩衝之 Dianeal<sup>®</sup>、與生物相容之 Physioneal<sup>®</sup> 對病人腹膜的影響。</p></div><div><h3>方法</h3><p>共 39 位剛開始接受 PD 的病人被分為兩組:19 人接受 Dianeal 透析液 (A 組)、20 人接受生物相容之 Physioneal 透析液 (B 組),所有病人接受的均為自動化 PD (APD)。研究結束時,我們對病人腹膜進行了活組織檢驗。</p></div><div><h3>結果</h3><p>在 A 組及 B 組之間,間皮細胞消失分別發生於 52.6% 及 60.0% 的病人,間皮細胞增生則分別發生於 21.1% 及 15.0% 的病人 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05);嚴重間質纖維化分別發生於 42.1% 及 45.0% 的病人,中度間質纖維化則分別發生於 31.6% 及 25.0% 的病人 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05)。在 A 組及 B 組的病人之間,彈性組織變性 (elastosis) 達到 “3+” 的比率分別為 15.8% 及 20.0%,達到 “2+” 的比率分別為 15.8% 及 15.0% (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05);異常微血管增加則分別出現於 42.1% 及 35.0% 的病人 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05)。在糖尿病患者之間、及接受 PD 較久的病人之間,腹膜病理性變化的比率均有所增加 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)。</p></div><div><h3>結論</h3><p>長期採用以上兩種腹膜透析液於 PD 病人中,並未導致不同的腹膜變化。然而,以下因素則可能導致不同的腹膜變化:末期腎病、糖尿病、及 PD 的持續時間。</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100611,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Nephrology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjn.2016.03.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156154131630014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background/Purpose

The peritoneal membrane of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is characterized by morphological and microvascular changes. It is said that lactate-based peritoneal dialysate is implicated in the development of these changes. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of long-term exposure to glucose-based, lactate-buffered (Dianeal), and biocompatible bicarbonate/lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product (Physioneal) peritoneal solutions on the peritoneal membrane.

Methods

Thirty-nine incident PD patients were randomized into two groups: 19 patients with Dianeal dialysate (Group A) and 20 with biocompatible Physioneal dialysate (Group B). All patients used automated PD for a median of 31 months in Group A and 32 months in Group B. Three biopsies at one occasion only were taken from the peritoneal membrane at the end of the study. All samples were collected and fixed in accordance with a standardized protocol, and a histopathologist blinded to the clinical status and PD solutions allocated to the patients carried out the analysis.

Results

The commonest change observed was peritoneal fibrosis, seen in 35 out of 39 cases (89.7%); it was moderate to severe in 28 cases (71.8%) and mild in 11 (28.2%) cases. This was followed by loss of mesothelial cells (22 cases, 56.4%), elastosis (20 cases, 51.3%), increased blood vessels (15 cases, 38.5%), thick-walled blood vessels (10 cases, 25.6%), and finally chronic inflammation and mesothelial cell hyperplasia (7 cases, 17.9%, and 6 cases, 15.4%, respectively). Of the patients with blood vessel abnormalities, 22 (88.0%) exhibited significant fibrosis and only three (12.0%) did not. Of those without blood vessel changes, only six (42.9%) patients exhibited similar degree of fibrosis (p < 0.01). The prevalence of vascular changes, moderate to severe fibrosis, as well as mesothelial cell abnormalities increased as the duration of PD increased. The prevalence of fibrosis, mesothelial cell loss, and vascular abnormalities increased significantly with diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

There was no difference in the effects of long-term exposure to glucose-based, lactate-buffered, and biocompatible bicarbonate/lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product peritoneal solutions on the peritoneal membrane. Risk factors other than PD dialysate composition need to be considered when assessing peritoneal membrane adequacy. The factors that were proved to be significant in our study are duration of end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and time on PD.

背景 / 目的

在接受長期腹膜透析 (PD) 的病人間,腹膜會出現若干的形態學與微血管變化,這些變化被認為與採用乳酸鹽腹膜透析液有關。本研究旨在比較兩種透析液的長期暴露—乳酸鹽緩衝之 Dianeal®、與生物相容之 Physioneal® 對病人腹膜的影響。

方法

共 39 位剛開始接受 PD 的病人被分為兩組:19 人接受 Dianeal 透析液 (A 組)、20 人接受生物相容之 Physioneal 透析液 (B 組),所有病人接受的均為自動化 PD (APD)。研究結束時,我們對病人腹膜進行了活組織檢驗。

結果

在 A 組及 B 組之間,間皮細胞消失分別發生於 52.6% 及 60.0% 的病人,間皮細胞增生則分別發生於 21.1% 及 15.0% 的病人 (p > 0.05);嚴重間質纖維化分別發生於 42.1% 及 45.0% 的病人,中度間質纖維化則分別發生於 31.6% 及 25.0% 的病人 (p > 0.05)。在 A 組及 B 組的病人之間,彈性組織變性 (elastosis) 達到 “3+” 的比率分別為 15.8% 及 20.0%,達到 “2+” 的比率分別為 15.8% 及 15.0% (p > 0.05);異常微血管增加則分別出現於 42.1% 及 35.0% 的病人 (p > 0.05)。在糖尿病患者之間、及接受 PD 較久的病人之間,腹膜病理性變化的比率均有所增加 (p < 0.001)。

結論

長期採用以上兩種腹膜透析液於 PD 病人中,並未導致不同的腹膜變化。然而,以下因素則可能導致不同的腹膜變化:末期腎病、糖尿病、及 PD 的持續時間。

不同腹膜透析液对腹膜的改变:有区别吗?
背景/目的长期腹膜透析(PD)患者的腹膜以形态和微血管改变为特征。据说,以乳酸为基础的腹膜透析液与这些变化的发生有关。本研究的目的是比较长期暴露于葡萄糖基乳酸缓冲溶液(dieal)和生物相容性碳酸氢盐/乳酸缓冲低糖降解产物(Physioneal)腹膜溶液对腹膜的影响。方法39例PD患者随机分为两组:19例患者使用dinal透析液(A组),20例患者使用生物相容性Physioneal透析液(B组)。所有患者均使用自动PD, A组中位时间为31个月,B组中位时间为32个月。研究结束时,仅在一次腹膜上进行了3次活检。所有样本按照标准化方案收集并固定,由组织病理学家对临床状态和分配给患者的PD溶液进行盲法分析。结果39例患者中最常见的改变是腹膜纤维化,占35例(89.7%);中度至重度28例(71.8%),轻度11例(28.2%)。其次是间皮细胞缺失(22例,56.4%)、弹性增生(20例,51.3%)、血管增生(15例,38.5%)、厚壁血管(10例,25.6%),最后是慢性炎症和间皮细胞增生(分别为7例,17.9%和6例,15.4%)。在血管异常的患者中,22例(88.0%)表现出明显的纤维化,只有3例(12.0%)没有。在没有血管改变的患者中,只有6名(42.9%)患者表现出类似程度的纤维化(p <0.01)。随着PD持续时间的增加,血管改变、中重度纤维化以及间皮细胞异常的发生率增加。糖尿病患者纤维化、间皮细胞丢失和血管异常的发生率显著增加(p <0.001)。结论长期暴露于葡萄糖基、乳酸缓冲和生物相容性碳酸氢盐/乳酸缓冲低糖降解产物腹膜溶液对腹膜的影响无差异。在评估腹膜充分性时,需要考虑PD透析液成分以外的危险因素。在我们的研究中被证明是重要的因素是终末期肾脏疾病的持续时间,糖尿病和PD的时间。背景/目的在接受長期腹膜透析(PD)的病人間,腹膜會出現若干的形態學與微血管變化,這些變化被認為與採用乳酸鹽腹膜透析液有關。本研究旨在比較兩種透析液的長期暴露——乳酸鹽緩衝之Dianeal®,與生物相容之Physioneal®對病人腹膜的影響。方法共39位剛開始接受PD的病人被分為兩組:19人接受Dianeal透析液(組),20人接受生物相容之Physioneal透析液(B組)所有病人接受的均為自動化PD (adp)。研究結束時,我們對病人腹膜進行了活組織檢驗。結果在一个組及B組之間,間皮細胞消失分別發生於52.6%及60.0%的病人,間皮細胞增生則分別發生於21.1%及15.0%的病人(p比;0.05);嚴重間質纖維化分別發生於42.1%及45.0%的病人,中度間質纖維化則分別發生於31.6%及25.0%的病人(p比;0.05)。在一个組及B組的病人之間,彈性組織變性(弹性组织变性)達到“3 +”的比率分別為15.8%及20.0%,達到“2 +”的比率分別為15.8%及15.0% (p比;(p > p >0.05)。【中文翻译】:p <0.001)。結論長期採用以上兩種腹膜透析液於PD病人中,並未導致不同的腹膜變化。“”“”“”“”“”“”“”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信