Neurologic Outcomes in Neonates Following the Introduction of a Restrictive Transfusion Guideline

D. Knee, Serena Knoop, A. Davis, Alisha DeBoer, Charito Madridejos, Jennifer Topiec
{"title":"Neurologic Outcomes in Neonates Following the Introduction of a Restrictive Transfusion Guideline","authors":"D. Knee, Serena Knoop, A. Davis, Alisha DeBoer, Charito Madridejos, Jennifer Topiec","doi":"10.33425/2689-1085.1020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants before and after the introduction of a restrictive transfusion guideline. Study design: This is a large retrospective study comparing neurodevelopmental outcomes before and after a restrictive transfusion guideline (RTG) was established for VLBW infants admitted to a large single neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Bayley-III scores obtained from routine NICU follow up appointments at pediatric neurodevelopmental clinics were evaluated. The mean age of obtaining the Bayley-III score was 20.3 months with a standard deviation of +/- 5.2 months. Results: Neurodevelopmental outcomes measured by Bayley-III scores, were similar for cognitive, language, and motor testing in the RTG versus LTG groups. In addition, the subcategories for normal, mild delay, moderate delay and severely delayed were also similar. Conclusion: RTG is safe in the neonatal VLBW population. RTG when compared to liberal transfusion guideline (LTG) is associated with similar neurodevelopmental outcomes as defined by Bayley-III scores.","PeriodicalId":75037,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of pediatrics and neonatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of pediatrics and neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2689-1085.1020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants before and after the introduction of a restrictive transfusion guideline. Study design: This is a large retrospective study comparing neurodevelopmental outcomes before and after a restrictive transfusion guideline (RTG) was established for VLBW infants admitted to a large single neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Bayley-III scores obtained from routine NICU follow up appointments at pediatric neurodevelopmental clinics were evaluated. The mean age of obtaining the Bayley-III score was 20.3 months with a standard deviation of +/- 5.2 months. Results: Neurodevelopmental outcomes measured by Bayley-III scores, were similar for cognitive, language, and motor testing in the RTG versus LTG groups. In addition, the subcategories for normal, mild delay, moderate delay and severely delayed were also similar. Conclusion: RTG is safe in the neonatal VLBW population. RTG when compared to liberal transfusion guideline (LTG) is associated with similar neurodevelopmental outcomes as defined by Bayley-III scores.
引入限制性输血指南后新生儿的神经系统预后
目的:评价极低出生体重儿(VLBW)引入限制性输血指南前后的神经发育结局。研究设计:这是一项大型回顾性研究,比较了在大型单一新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住的VLBW婴儿实施限制性输血指南(RTG)前后的神经发育结果。在小儿神经发育诊所的新生儿重症监护病房常规随访预约中获得Bayley-III评分进行评估。获得Bayley-III评分的平均年龄为20.3个月,标准差为±5.2个月。结果:通过Bayley-III评分测量的神经发育结果在RTG组和LTG组的认知、语言和运动测试中是相似的。此外,正常、轻度延迟、中度延迟和严重延迟的子分类也相似。结论:RTG在新生儿VLBW人群中是安全的。与自由输血指南(LTG)相比,RTG与Bayley-III评分定义的相似神经发育结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信