Social policy and law regarding education and equal social integration of persons with disabilities: model and lessons learned

Q1 Social Sciences
Tavee Cheausuwantavee
{"title":"Social policy and law regarding education and equal social integration of persons with disabilities: model and lessons learned","authors":"Tavee Cheausuwantavee","doi":"10.1017/idm.2014.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Little is known about the overview of legal essences and their enforcement regarding educational provisions for persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Thailand. Objectives: It aims to 1) comprehensively review, establish and launch model regarding reformation of policy and law, 2) identify results of law enforcement as a past decade, present as a lesson learned on educational provisions for PWDs through consciousness raising of stakeholders. Methods: This research is participation action research (PAR) and content analysis. As PAR, the two research sites with 13 and 15 participants as private and public education centres for PWDs respectively were voluntarily and purposively selected. Those participants included teachers, administrators, parents of PWDs. As content analysis, the results of two previous research projects were collected. Those data were analyzed by interpretation and analytic induction. Findings: Even the rights of PWDs were more concerned by society than the past decade, but educational provisions for PWDs have still challenged and should be mainly promoted on 1) positive attitudes toward PWDs, 2) particular skills and knowledge of teachers as IEP, inclusive education and transition services 3) reasonable accommodation and assistive technologies, 4) human resource development. As PAR, inclusive education was mainly concerned by participants. It reflected what participants coped with and how they solved comprehensively. Discussion: Problems and ineffective law enforcement on educational provisions for PWDs in Thailand existing like previous studies in other developed and developing countries. Positive attitudes of society toward PWDs, collaboration, consciousness raising and patience among stakeholders are the key success of educational provisions for PWDs in which can be enhanced through PAR. Conclusion: The majority of law enforcement and educational equality of PWDs were still ineffective and discriminated. Thus, role of parents and private centers as well as positive attitudes and collaboration among stakeholders need to be systematically promoted.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the overview of legal essences and their enforcement regarding educational provisions for persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Thailand. Objectives: It aims to 1) comprehensively review, establish and launch model regarding reformation of policy and law, 2) identify results of law enforcement as a past decade, present as a lesson learned on educational provisions for PWDs through consciousness raising of stakeholders. Methods: This research is participation action research (PAR) and content analysis. As PAR, the two research sites with 13 and 15 participants as private and public education centres for PWDs respectively were voluntarily and purposively selected. Those participants included teachers, administrators, parents of PWDs. As content analysis, the results of two previous research projects were collected. Those data were analyzed by interpretation and analytic induction. Findings: Even the rights of PWDs were more concerned by society than the past decade, but educational provisions for PWDs have still challenged and should be mainly promoted on 1) positive attitudes toward PWDs, 2) particular skills and knowledge of teachers as IEP, inclusive education and transition services 3) reasonable accommodation and assistive technologies, 4) human resource development. As PAR, inclusive education was mainly concerned by participants. It reflected what participants coped with and how they solved comprehensively. Discussion: Problems and ineffective law enforcement on educational provisions for PWDs in Thailand existing like previous studies in other developed and developing countries. Positive attitudes of society toward PWDs, collaboration, consciousness raising and patience among stakeholders are the key success of educational provisions for PWDs in which can be enhanced through PAR. Conclusion: The majority of law enforcement and educational equality of PWDs were still ineffective and discriminated. Thus, role of parents and private centers as well as positive attitudes and collaboration among stakeholders need to be systematically promoted.
关于残疾人教育和平等融入社会的社会政策和法律:模式和经验教训
背景:关于泰国残疾人教育规定的法律要点及其执行概况,人们知之甚少。目标:旨在1)全面检讨、建立和推出政策和法律改革模式;2)总结过去十年的执法成果,通过提高持份者的意识,为残疾人士提供教育方面的经验教训。方法:本研究采用参与式行动研究(PAR)和内容分析法。两个研究地点分别有13名和15名参与者,分别作为私营和公立残疾人士教育中心,是自愿和有目的地选择的。参加者包括教师、行政人员及残疾人士的家长。作为内容分析,我们收集了之前两个研究项目的结果。通过解释和分析归纳法对这些数据进行分析。研究发现:虽然残疾人士的权利比过去十年更受社会关注,但残疾人士的教育服务仍面临挑战,应主要从1)对残疾人士的积极态度,2)教师作为IEP的特殊技能和知识,全纳教育和过渡服务,3)合理的住宿和辅助技术,4)人力资源开发等方面进行促进。作为PAR,全纳教育是参与者主要关注的问题。它反映了参与者应对的问题以及他们如何全面解决问题。讨论:与其他发达国家和发展中国家以往的研究一样,泰国在残疾人士教育方面存在的问题和执法不力。社会对残疾人士的积极态度,合作,意识的提高和利益相关者的耐心是残疾人士教育措施成功的关键,可以通过PAR来提高残疾人士的教育平等。结论:大多数残疾人士的执法和教育平等仍然是无效的和歧视的。因此,需要系统地促进家长和私立中心的作用以及利益相关者之间的积极态度和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Disability Management
International Journal of Disability Management Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信