Cost effectiveness in palliative care setting

Q2 Social Sciences
H. O’Lawrence, Rohan Chowlkar
{"title":"Cost effectiveness in palliative care setting","authors":"H. O’Lawrence, Rohan Chowlkar","doi":"10.1108/IJOTB-02-2018-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to determine the cost effectiveness of palliative care on patients in a home health and hospice setting. Secondary data set was utilized to test the hypotheses of this study. Home health care and hospice care services have the potential to avert hospital admissions in patients requiring palliative care, which significantly affects medicare spending. With the aging population, it has become evident that demand of palliative care will increase four-fold. It was determined that current spending on end-of-life care is radically emptying medicare funds and fiscally weakening numerous families who have patients under palliative care during life-threatening illnesses. The study found that a majority of people registering for palliative and hospice care settings are above the age group of 55 years old.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDifferent variables like length of stay, mode of payment and disease diagnosis were used to filter the available data set. Secondary data were utilized to test the hypothesis of this study. There are very few studies on hospice and palliative care services and no study focuses on the cost associated with this care. Since a very large number of the USA, population is turning 65 and over, it is very important to analyze the cost of care for palliative and hospice care. For the purpose of this analysis, data were utilized from the National Home and Hospice Care Survey (NHHCS), which has been conducted periodically by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests and t-tests were used to test for statistical significance at the p<0.05 level.\n\n\nFindings\nThe Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was utilized for this result. H1 predicted that patients in the age group of 65 years and up have the highest utilization of home and hospice care. This study examined various demographic variables in hospice and home health care which may help to evaluate the cost of care and the modes of payments. This section of the result presents the descriptive analysis of dependent, independent and covariate variables that provide the overall national estimates on differences in use of home and hospice care in various age groups and sex.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe data set used was from the 2007 NHHCS survey, no data have been collected thereafter, and therefore, gap in data analysis may give inaccurate findings. To compensate for this gap in the data set, recent studies were reviewed which analyzed cost in palliative care in the USA. There has been a lack of evidence to prove the cost savings and improved quality of life in palliative/hospice care. There is a need for new research on the various cost factors affecting palliative care services as well as considering the quality of life. Although, it is evident that palliative care treatment is less expensive as compared to the regular care, since it eliminates the direct hospitalization cost, but there is inadequate research to prove that it improves the quality of life. A detailed research is required considering the additional cost incurred in palliative/hospice care services and a cost-benefit analysis of the same.\n\n\nPractical implications\nWhile various studies reporting information applicable to the expenses and effect of family caregiving toward the end-of-life were distinguished, none of the previous research discussed this issue as their central focus. Most studies addressed more extensive financial effect of palliative and end-of-life care, including expenses borne by the patients themselves, the medicinal services framework and safety net providers or beneficent/willful suppliers. This shows a significant hole in the current writing.\n\n\nSocial implications\nWith the aging population, it has become evident that demand of palliative/hospice care will increase four-fold. The NHHCS have stopped keeping track of the palliative care requirements after 2007, which has a negative impact on the growing needs. Cost analysis can only be performed by analyzing existing data. This review has recognized a huge niche in the evidence base with respect to the cost cares of giving care and supporting a relative inside a palliative/hospice care setting.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study exhibited that cost diminishments in aggressive medications can take care of the expenses of palliative/hospice care services. The issue of evaluating result in such a physically measurable way is complicated by the impalpable nature of large portions of the individual components of outcome. Although physical and mental well-being can be evaluated to a certain degree, it is significantly more difficult to gauge in a quantifiable way, the social and profound measurements of care that help fundamentally to general quality of care.\n","PeriodicalId":35239,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-02-2018-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the cost effectiveness of palliative care on patients in a home health and hospice setting. Secondary data set was utilized to test the hypotheses of this study. Home health care and hospice care services have the potential to avert hospital admissions in patients requiring palliative care, which significantly affects medicare spending. With the aging population, it has become evident that demand of palliative care will increase four-fold. It was determined that current spending on end-of-life care is radically emptying medicare funds and fiscally weakening numerous families who have patients under palliative care during life-threatening illnesses. The study found that a majority of people registering for palliative and hospice care settings are above the age group of 55 years old. Design/methodology/approach Different variables like length of stay, mode of payment and disease diagnosis were used to filter the available data set. Secondary data were utilized to test the hypothesis of this study. There are very few studies on hospice and palliative care services and no study focuses on the cost associated with this care. Since a very large number of the USA, population is turning 65 and over, it is very important to analyze the cost of care for palliative and hospice care. For the purpose of this analysis, data were utilized from the National Home and Hospice Care Survey (NHHCS), which has been conducted periodically by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests and t-tests were used to test for statistical significance at the p<0.05 level. Findings The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was utilized for this result. H1 predicted that patients in the age group of 65 years and up have the highest utilization of home and hospice care. This study examined various demographic variables in hospice and home health care which may help to evaluate the cost of care and the modes of payments. This section of the result presents the descriptive analysis of dependent, independent and covariate variables that provide the overall national estimates on differences in use of home and hospice care in various age groups and sex. Research limitations/implications The data set used was from the 2007 NHHCS survey, no data have been collected thereafter, and therefore, gap in data analysis may give inaccurate findings. To compensate for this gap in the data set, recent studies were reviewed which analyzed cost in palliative care in the USA. There has been a lack of evidence to prove the cost savings and improved quality of life in palliative/hospice care. There is a need for new research on the various cost factors affecting palliative care services as well as considering the quality of life. Although, it is evident that palliative care treatment is less expensive as compared to the regular care, since it eliminates the direct hospitalization cost, but there is inadequate research to prove that it improves the quality of life. A detailed research is required considering the additional cost incurred in palliative/hospice care services and a cost-benefit analysis of the same. Practical implications While various studies reporting information applicable to the expenses and effect of family caregiving toward the end-of-life were distinguished, none of the previous research discussed this issue as their central focus. Most studies addressed more extensive financial effect of palliative and end-of-life care, including expenses borne by the patients themselves, the medicinal services framework and safety net providers or beneficent/willful suppliers. This shows a significant hole in the current writing. Social implications With the aging population, it has become evident that demand of palliative/hospice care will increase four-fold. The NHHCS have stopped keeping track of the palliative care requirements after 2007, which has a negative impact on the growing needs. Cost analysis can only be performed by analyzing existing data. This review has recognized a huge niche in the evidence base with respect to the cost cares of giving care and supporting a relative inside a palliative/hospice care setting. Originality/value The study exhibited that cost diminishments in aggressive medications can take care of the expenses of palliative/hospice care services. The issue of evaluating result in such a physically measurable way is complicated by the impalpable nature of large portions of the individual components of outcome. Although physical and mental well-being can be evaluated to a certain degree, it is significantly more difficult to gauge in a quantifiable way, the social and profound measurements of care that help fundamentally to general quality of care.
姑息治疗环境的成本效益
目的本文的目的是确定在家庭健康和临终关怀设置的病人姑息治疗的成本效益。利用二次数据集检验本研究的假设。家庭保健和临终关怀服务有可能避免需要姑息治疗的患者住院,这将显著影响医疗保险支出。随着人口老龄化,姑息治疗的需求将明显增加四倍。人们确定,目前在临终关怀上的支出正在从根本上掏空医疗保险基金,并在财政上削弱了许多家庭的财力,这些家庭的病人在生命危险的疾病期间接受了姑息治疗。研究发现,大多数注册姑息治疗和临终关怀机构的人都在55岁以上。设计/方法/方法使用住院时间、支付方式和疾病诊断等不同变量筛选可用数据集。我们利用二手资料来检验本研究的假设。关于临终关怀和姑息治疗服务的研究很少,也没有研究关注与这种护理相关的成本。由于美国65岁以上的人口数量非常多,因此分析姑息治疗和临终关怀的护理成本非常重要。为了进行这项分析,数据来自国家家庭和临终关怀调查(NHHCS),该调查由疾病控制和预防中心的国家卫生统计中心定期进行。采用描述性统计、χ2检验和t检验,在p<0.05水平上检验差异有统计学意义。研究结果社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)被用于这个结果。H1预测65岁及以上的患者对家庭和临终关怀的使用率最高。本研究检视安宁疗护与家庭健康照护的人口学变数,以协助评估安宁疗护的成本与支付方式。本部分的结果呈现因变量、独立变量和协变量的描述性分析,这些变量提供了不同年龄和性别的家庭和临终关怀使用差异的总体全国估计。研究局限性/意义使用的数据集来自2007年NHHCS调查,此后没有收集数据,因此,数据分析中的差距可能会给出不准确的结果。为了弥补这一差距的数据集,最近的研究回顾了分析成本在美国姑息治疗。一直缺乏证据证明在缓和/临终关怀中节省成本和改善生活质量。有必要对影响姑息治疗服务的各种成本因素进行新的研究,并考虑到生活质量。虽然,姑息治疗显然比常规护理更便宜,因为它消除了直接的住院费用,但没有足够的研究证明它能提高生活质量。考虑到缓和/临终关怀服务产生的额外费用,需要进行详细的研究,并对其进行成本效益分析。虽然各种研究报告了适用于家庭临终关怀的费用和效果的信息,但以前的研究都没有把这个问题作为他们的中心焦点。大多数研究涉及姑息治疗和临终关怀的更广泛的财务影响,包括由患者自己、医疗服务框架和安全网提供者或慈善/自愿提供者承担的费用。这显示了当前写作中的一个重大漏洞。社会影响随着人口老化,对缓和/安宁疗护的需求将明显增加四倍。国家卫生保健服务中心在2007年以后停止了对姑息治疗需求的跟踪,这对日益增长的需求产生了负面影响。成本分析只能通过分析现有数据来进行。这篇综述已经认识到,在姑息/临终关怀环境中,提供护理和支持亲属的成本护理方面,证据基础中存在巨大的利基。原创性/价值研究表明,积极药物的成本降低可以照顾到缓和/临终关怀服务的费用。以这种物理上可测量的方式评价结果的问题由于结果的个别组成部分的大部分不可触摸的性质而变得复杂。虽然身体和精神健康可以在一定程度上进行评估,但要以可量化的方式进行衡量要困难得多,对护理的社会和深刻测量从根本上有助于总体护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior brings together researchers and practitioners, both within and outside the United States, who are in the areas of organization theory, management, development, and behavior. This journal covers all private, public and not-for-profit organizations’ theories and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信