Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Contralateral Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty: A Case Series

M. Flören, D. Lester
{"title":"Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Contralateral Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty: A Case Series","authors":"M. Flören, D. Lester","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200311000-00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is continuing controversy about whether total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty should be used for the management of displaced subcapital hip fractures or advanced avascular necrosis of the femoral head, especially in patients with normal-appearing acetabular cartilage. The decision regarding which procedure to perform may be influenced by several factors, including the underlying disease process, perioperative risks 1,2, likelihood of revision 3-5, and economic considerations 6-8. Published reports are difficult to interpret because the series differ with regard to the surgeons performing the operations, surgical approaches, methods of fixation, postoperative protocols, patient mix, and duration of follow-up 3,5,9-18. In our retrospective review, we compared the clinical and radiographic results and patient-reported outcomes of the two procedures in nine patients who had undergone a bipolar hemiarthroplasty on one side and a total hip arthroplasty on the other.\n\nWe conducted a retrospective review of the records on 750 consecutive hip arthroplasties performed between 1988 and 1995, and we identified seventy-five patients (10%) who had undergone bilateral hip replacement. Of these, nine had undergone total hip arthroplasty on one side and bipolar hemiarthroplasty on the other. There were eight women and one man.\n\nThe mean age (and standard deviation) at the time of the bipolar hemiarthroplasty was 74 ± 19 years (range, twenty-eight to eighty-seven years), and the mean age at the time of the total hip arthroplasty was 74 ± 18 years (range, twenty-seven to eighty-seven years). Eight bipolar hemiarthroplasties were performed because of a displaced subcapital hip fracture and one, because of avascular necrosis. Five total hip arthroplasties were performed because of a subcapital hip fracture; two, because of avascular necrosis; and two, because of osteoarthritis.\n\nAll patients underwent staged bilateral hip replacement. A …","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"523–526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200311000-00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There is continuing controversy about whether total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty should be used for the management of displaced subcapital hip fractures or advanced avascular necrosis of the femoral head, especially in patients with normal-appearing acetabular cartilage. The decision regarding which procedure to perform may be influenced by several factors, including the underlying disease process, perioperative risks 1,2, likelihood of revision 3-5, and economic considerations 6-8. Published reports are difficult to interpret because the series differ with regard to the surgeons performing the operations, surgical approaches, methods of fixation, postoperative protocols, patient mix, and duration of follow-up 3,5,9-18. In our retrospective review, we compared the clinical and radiographic results and patient-reported outcomes of the two procedures in nine patients who had undergone a bipolar hemiarthroplasty on one side and a total hip arthroplasty on the other. We conducted a retrospective review of the records on 750 consecutive hip arthroplasties performed between 1988 and 1995, and we identified seventy-five patients (10%) who had undergone bilateral hip replacement. Of these, nine had undergone total hip arthroplasty on one side and bipolar hemiarthroplasty on the other. There were eight women and one man. The mean age (and standard deviation) at the time of the bipolar hemiarthroplasty was 74 ± 19 years (range, twenty-eight to eighty-seven years), and the mean age at the time of the total hip arthroplasty was 74 ± 18 years (range, twenty-seven to eighty-seven years). Eight bipolar hemiarthroplasties were performed because of a displaced subcapital hip fracture and one, because of avascular necrosis. Five total hip arthroplasties were performed because of a subcapital hip fracture; two, because of avascular necrosis; and two, because of osteoarthritis. All patients underwent staged bilateral hip replacement. A …
全髋关节置换术和对侧双极半关节置换术的结果:一个病例系列
对于移位的髋关节下骨折或股骨头晚期无血管坏死患者,尤其是外观正常的髋臼软骨患者,是否应采用全髋关节置换术或双极半髋关节置换术仍存在争议。决定采用哪种手术可能受到几个因素的影响,包括潜在的疾病进程、围手术期风险1,2、翻修的可能性3-5和经济考虑6-8。已发表的报告很难解释,因为该系列在实施手术的外科医生、手术入路、固定方法、术后方案、患者组合和随访时间等方面存在差异3,5,9-18。在我们的回顾性回顾中,我们比较了9例一侧接受双极半关节置换术,另一侧接受全髋关节置换术的患者的临床和影像学结果以及患者报告的结果。我们对1988年至1995年间750例连续髋关节置换术的记录进行了回顾性回顾,我们确定了75例(10%)患者接受了双侧髋关节置换术。其中,9人一侧接受了全髋关节置换术,另一侧接受了双极半关节置换术。有八个女人和一个男人。双极半关节置换术时的平均年龄(和标准差)为74±19岁(范围,28至87岁),全髋关节置换术时的平均年龄为74±18岁(范围,27至87岁)。8例因移位性髋关节下骨折而行双极半关节置换术,1例因缺血性坏死而行双极半关节置换术。5例全髋关节置换术均因髋部下骨折;二、因无血管坏死;第二,因为骨关节炎。所有患者均分期行双侧髋关节置换术。一个……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信