Complexity analysis of VMAT prostate plans: insights from dimensionality reduction and information theory techniques

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
E. Kamperis, C. Kodona, Apostolia Papalexandrou, G. Arsos, Anna-Bettina Heidich, K. Hatziioannou, V. Giannouzakos, E. Papanastasiou
{"title":"Complexity analysis of VMAT prostate plans: insights from dimensionality reduction and information theory techniques","authors":"E. Kamperis, C. Kodona, Apostolia Papalexandrou, G. Arsos, Anna-Bettina Heidich, K. Hatziioannou, V. Giannouzakos, E. Papanastasiou","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a state-of-the-art prostate cancer treatment, defined by high dose gradients around targets. Its unique dose shaping incurs hidden complexity, impacting treatment deliverability, carcinogenesis, and machine strain. This study compares various aperture-based VMAT complexity indices in prostate cases using principal component and mutual information analyses. It suggests essential properties for an ideal complexity index from an information-theoretic viewpoint. Material and methods: The following ten complexity indices were calculated in 217 VMAT prostate plans: circumference over area (CoA), edge metric (EM), equivalent square field (ESF), leaf travel (LT), leaf travel modulation complexity score for VMAT (LTMCSV), mean-field area (MFA), modulation complexity score (standard MCS and VMAT variant MCSV), plan irregularity (PI), and small aperture score (SAS5mm). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to explore the correlations between the metrics. The differential entropy of all metrics was also calculated, along with the mutual information for all 45 metric pairs. Results: Whole-pelvis plans had greater complexity across all indices. The first three principal components explained 96.2% of the total variance. The complexity metrics formed three groups with similar conceptual characteristics, particularly ESF, LT, MFA, PI, and EM, SAS5mm. The differential entropy varied across the complexity metrics (PI having the smallest vs. EM the largest). Mutual information analysis (MIA) confirmed some metrics’ interdependence, although other pairs, such as LTMCSV/SAS5mm, LT/MCSV, and EM/SAS5mm, were found to share minimal MI. Conclusions: There are many complexity indices for VMAT described in the literature. PCA and MIA analyses can uncover significant overlap among them. However, this is not entirely reducible through dimensionality reduction techniques, suggesting that there also exists some reciprocity. When designing predictive models of quality assurance metrics, PCA and MIA may prove useful for feature engineering.","PeriodicalId":53955,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"143 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a state-of-the-art prostate cancer treatment, defined by high dose gradients around targets. Its unique dose shaping incurs hidden complexity, impacting treatment deliverability, carcinogenesis, and machine strain. This study compares various aperture-based VMAT complexity indices in prostate cases using principal component and mutual information analyses. It suggests essential properties for an ideal complexity index from an information-theoretic viewpoint. Material and methods: The following ten complexity indices were calculated in 217 VMAT prostate plans: circumference over area (CoA), edge metric (EM), equivalent square field (ESF), leaf travel (LT), leaf travel modulation complexity score for VMAT (LTMCSV), mean-field area (MFA), modulation complexity score (standard MCS and VMAT variant MCSV), plan irregularity (PI), and small aperture score (SAS5mm). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to explore the correlations between the metrics. The differential entropy of all metrics was also calculated, along with the mutual information for all 45 metric pairs. Results: Whole-pelvis plans had greater complexity across all indices. The first three principal components explained 96.2% of the total variance. The complexity metrics formed three groups with similar conceptual characteristics, particularly ESF, LT, MFA, PI, and EM, SAS5mm. The differential entropy varied across the complexity metrics (PI having the smallest vs. EM the largest). Mutual information analysis (MIA) confirmed some metrics’ interdependence, although other pairs, such as LTMCSV/SAS5mm, LT/MCSV, and EM/SAS5mm, were found to share minimal MI. Conclusions: There are many complexity indices for VMAT described in the literature. PCA and MIA analyses can uncover significant overlap among them. However, this is not entirely reducible through dimensionality reduction techniques, suggesting that there also exists some reciprocity. When designing predictive models of quality assurance metrics, PCA and MIA may prove useful for feature engineering.
VMAT前列腺计划的复杂性分析:来自降维和信息理论技术的见解
体积调制弧线疗法(VMAT)是一种最先进的前列腺癌治疗方法,其特点是围绕靶点进行高剂量梯度治疗。其独特的剂量形成带来了隐藏的复杂性,影响了治疗的可交付性、致癌性和机器应变。本研究利用主成分分析和互信息分析比较了不同孔径VMAT复杂性指数在前列腺病例中的应用。从信息论的角度提出了理想复杂性指数的基本性质。材料与方法:对217张VMAT前列腺图计算以下10项复杂性指标:周长比面积(CoA)、边缘度量(EM)、等效方场(ESF)、叶行程(LT)、VMAT叶行程调制复杂性评分(LTMCSV)、平均场面积(MFA)、调制复杂性评分(标准MCS和VMAT变型MCSV)、平面不规则性(PI)和小孔径评分(SAS5mm)。应用主成分分析(PCA)探讨指标之间的相关性。还计算了所有度量的微分熵,以及所有45个度量对的互信息。结果:整个骨盆平面图在所有指标中都具有更大的复杂性。前三个主成分解释了总方差的96.2%。复杂性度量形成了具有相似概念特征的三组,特别是ESF、LT、MFA、PI和EM、SAS5mm。不同复杂度度量的微分熵不同(PI最小,EM最大)。互信息分析(MIA)证实了一些指标的相互依赖性,尽管其他对,如LTMCSV/SAS5mm、LT/MCSV和EM/SAS5mm,被发现共享最小的MI。结论:文献中描述了VMAT的许多复杂性指标。PCA和MIA分析可以揭示它们之间的显著重叠。然而,通过维数约简技术,这并不是完全可约的,这表明也存在一些互惠。在设计质量保证度量的预测模型时,PCA和MIA可能对特征工程有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering (PJMPE) (Online ISSN: 1898-0309; Print ISSN: 1425-4689) is an official publication of the Polish Society of Medical Physics. It is a peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal with no publication fees. The issues are published quarterly online. The Journal publishes original contribution in medical physics and biomedical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信