Can Shanghai Surpass Hong Kong?

Niv Horesh (荷尼夫), Shuyu (Susie) Wu (吴舒钰)
{"title":"Can Shanghai Surpass Hong Kong?","authors":"Niv Horesh (荷尼夫), Shuyu (Susie) Wu (吴舒钰)","doi":"10.5130/pc.v4i1.2847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the economic development of Shanghai and Hong Kong over the last 150 years in a bid to uncover why Shanghai fell behind Hong Kong despite its head start as an international financial center in the 1920s. It then examines whether Shanghai might eventually catch up with Hong Kong in terms of standard of living, technological innovation, infrastructure, creativity and social cohesion. Both cities were faced with new opportunities after the global financial crisis, and both are aiming at present to extend their capital markets. Although, since the 1990s, economic reforms have given Shanghai a breath-taking makeover, Hong Kong’s fiscal architecture is still more business-friendly. Hong Kong also possesses a higher degree of global exposure, and more efficient and transparent equity markets. Notwithstanding Shanghai’s “open-door” policy and lower cost of living, Hong Kong has proven more attractive to global talent. But Shanghai and Hong Kong will cash in on China’s rise in different ways, and the gap between two cities is therefore likely to narrow. Local Policy-makers are best advised to design complimentary business environments rather than trying to out-perform the other city in its area of strength.","PeriodicalId":89237,"journal":{"name":"Provincial China","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Provincial China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/pc.v4i1.2847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article compares the economic development of Shanghai and Hong Kong over the last 150 years in a bid to uncover why Shanghai fell behind Hong Kong despite its head start as an international financial center in the 1920s. It then examines whether Shanghai might eventually catch up with Hong Kong in terms of standard of living, technological innovation, infrastructure, creativity and social cohesion. Both cities were faced with new opportunities after the global financial crisis, and both are aiming at present to extend their capital markets. Although, since the 1990s, economic reforms have given Shanghai a breath-taking makeover, Hong Kong’s fiscal architecture is still more business-friendly. Hong Kong also possesses a higher degree of global exposure, and more efficient and transparent equity markets. Notwithstanding Shanghai’s “open-door” policy and lower cost of living, Hong Kong has proven more attractive to global talent. But Shanghai and Hong Kong will cash in on China’s rise in different ways, and the gap between two cities is therefore likely to narrow. Local Policy-makers are best advised to design complimentary business environments rather than trying to out-perform the other city in its area of strength.
上海能超越香港吗?
本文将比较上海和香港在过去150年的经济发展,试图揭示为什么上海在20世纪20年代作为国际金融中心起步,但却落后于香港。然后,它考察了上海是否可能最终在生活水平、技术创新、基础设施、创造力和社会凝聚力方面赶上香港。在全球金融危机之后,两个城市都面临着新的机遇,目前都致力于扩大资本市场。尽管自上世纪90年代以来,经济改革使上海发生了翻天覆地的变化,但香港的财政结构仍对企业更为友好。香港还拥有更高的全球敞口程度,以及更高效和透明的股票市场。尽管上海实行“门户开放”政策,生活成本也较低,但事实证明,香港对全球人才更具吸引力。但上海和香港将以不同的方式从中国的崛起中获利,因此两个城市之间的差距可能会缩小。最好建议当地政策制定者设计互补的商业环境,而不是试图在优势领域超越其他城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书