Meta-Analysis the Effect of School Based Intervention on Smoking in Adolescents

Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI:10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.01.04

M. R. Azhary, E. Pamungkasari, Yulia Lanti Retno Dewi

{"title":"Meta-Analysis the Effect of School Based Intervention on Smoking in Adolescents","authors":"M. R. Azhary, E. Pamungkasari, Yulia Lanti Retno Dewi","doi":"10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tobacco is a global problem, in which at least 5 million people die from diseases caused by the consumption of tobacco products such as cigarettes each year, such as cervical cancer, heart disease, gastric ulcers, tuberculosis, kidney failure, pancreas, leukemia, pneumonia, gum and mouth disease as well as lung cancer. This study aims to estimate the magnitude of the effect of School based intervention on cigarette consumption based on the results of a number of previous studies. Subjects and Method: This research is a systematic study and meta-analysis, with PICO as follows Population = junior high school and high school students, Intervention = School based intervention. Comparison = No School based intervention. Outcome = cigarette consumption. The articles used in this study were obtained from several databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar. This article article was collected for 2 months. The keywords for searching articles are as follows: \"School-based intervention\" AND tobacco OR smoke OR cigarette AND RCT OR \"Randomized Controlled Trial\". The articles included in this study are full text articles with a randomized controlled trial study design. Articles were collected using PRISMA flow diagrams. They were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application. Results: A total of 11 articles reviewed in this meta-analysis study originated from the United States, Sweden, California, Brazil, Germany, Ireland, China, Australia and Indonesia. Studies show that School based intervention has no significant effect on cigarette consumption (Standardized Mean Difference = -0.74; 95% CI = -1.67 to 0.18; p = 0.110). Conclusion: School based intervention reduces cigarette consumption. Keywords: School based intervention, tobacco, cigarette consumption Correspondence: Muhammad Rifqi Azhary. Masters Program In Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: Rifqiazhary.ra@gmail.com. Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(01): 32-44 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.01.04","PeriodicalId":16038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Tobacco is a global problem, in which at least 5 million people die from diseases caused by the consumption of tobacco products such as cigarettes each year, such as cervical cancer, heart disease, gastric ulcers, tuberculosis, kidney failure, pancreas, leukemia, pneumonia, gum and mouth disease as well as lung cancer. This study aims to estimate the magnitude of the effect of School based intervention on cigarette consumption based on the results of a number of previous studies. Subjects and Method: This research is a systematic study and meta-analysis, with PICO as follows Population = junior high school and high school students, Intervention = School based intervention. Comparison = No School based intervention. Outcome = cigarette consumption. The articles used in this study were obtained from several databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar. This article article was collected for 2 months. The keywords for searching articles are as follows: "School-based intervention" AND tobacco OR smoke OR cigarette AND RCT OR "Randomized Controlled Trial". The articles included in this study are full text articles with a randomized controlled trial study design. Articles were collected using PRISMA flow diagrams. They were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application. Results: A total of 11 articles reviewed in this meta-analysis study originated from the United States, Sweden, California, Brazil, Germany, Ireland, China, Australia and Indonesia. Studies show that School based intervention has no significant effect on cigarette consumption (Standardized Mean Difference = -0.74; 95% CI = -1.67 to 0.18; p = 0.110). Conclusion: School based intervention reduces cigarette consumption. Keywords: School based intervention, tobacco, cigarette consumption Correspondence: Muhammad Rifqi Azhary. Masters Program In Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: Rifqiazhary.ra@gmail.com. Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(01): 32-44 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.01.04

查看原文本刊更多论文

学校干预对青少年吸烟影响的meta分析

背景:烟草是一个全球性问题，每年至少有500万人死于因吸烟等烟草制品引起的疾病，如宫颈癌、心脏病、胃溃疡、肺结核、肾衰竭、胰腺、白血病、肺炎、牙龈和口腔疾病以及肺癌。本研究的目的是根据先前一些研究的结果，估计以学校为基础的干预对香烟消费的影响程度。研究对象和方法:本研究采用系统研究和荟萃分析，PICO为:人口=初中生和高中生，干预=校本干预。对比=无学校干预。结果=香烟消费。本研究中使用的文章来自PubMed、ScienceDirect和b谷歌Scholar等多个数据库。这篇文章收集了2个月。检索文章的关键词为:“校本干预”、“烟草或烟雾”、“随机对照试验”。本研究纳入的文章均为全文文章，采用随机对照试验研究设计。使用PRISMA流程图收集文章。使用Review Manager 5.3应用程序对它们进行分析。结果:本荟萃分析研究共纳入了来自美国、瑞典、加利福尼亚、巴西、德国、爱尔兰、中国、澳大利亚和印度尼西亚的11篇文章。研究表明，学校干预对卷烟消费无显著影响(标准化平均差= -0.74;95% CI = -1.67 ~ 0.18;P = 0.110)。结论:以学校为基础的干预减少了卷烟消费。关键词:校本干预，烟草，卷烟消费塞贝拉斯市场大学公共卫生硕士课程。杰。红外光谱。Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126，中爪哇。电子邮件:Rifqiazhary.ra@gmail.com。健康促进与行为杂志(2021)，06(01):32-44 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.01.04

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior

自引率

0.00%

发文量