Building research capacity in clinical practice for social workers: a training and mentorship approach

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Tania Withington, N. Alcorn, D. Maybery, M. Goodyear
{"title":"Building research capacity in clinical practice for social workers: a training and mentorship approach","authors":"Tania Withington, N. Alcorn, D. Maybery, M. Goodyear","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2020.1726194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This paper describes a Training and Mentoring Program, designed to enhance research capacity for social workers based in community and inpatient settings in Australia. Method: Twenty-one social workers participated in the multiday training and follow-up mentoring program (small group and individual) over a 24-month period. Outlined is a mixed-method quasi-experimental evaluation of the approach. Results: Quantitative data showed an increase in self-reported research capacity including knowledge, confidence, behaviour and satisfaction. The mentoring approach appeared to be a crucial component for participants – for their engagement with research, willingness or ability to bypass perceived and real hurdles, and completion of an individual research project. A significant barrier to research was a lack of available research time during their clinical role and forcing participants to complete research projects in their own time. Additionally, personal challenges such as health and family commitments on time available to undertake research after hours impacted on engagement and research project completion. Discussion: Social workers are critical contributors to practice-based evidence development in health and mental health settings. However, many report a lack of knowledge, confidence and skills in service evaluation and research. The findings demonstrate that social workers are keen to take on practitioner-research roles, that research capacity is enhanced through training particularly with follow-up mentoring to support individual research project development and implementation, and that large system changes need to occur to support social workers to engage in research activities in their work context.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"124 1","pages":"73 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2020.1726194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This paper describes a Training and Mentoring Program, designed to enhance research capacity for social workers based in community and inpatient settings in Australia. Method: Twenty-one social workers participated in the multiday training and follow-up mentoring program (small group and individual) over a 24-month period. Outlined is a mixed-method quasi-experimental evaluation of the approach. Results: Quantitative data showed an increase in self-reported research capacity including knowledge, confidence, behaviour and satisfaction. The mentoring approach appeared to be a crucial component for participants – for their engagement with research, willingness or ability to bypass perceived and real hurdles, and completion of an individual research project. A significant barrier to research was a lack of available research time during their clinical role and forcing participants to complete research projects in their own time. Additionally, personal challenges such as health and family commitments on time available to undertake research after hours impacted on engagement and research project completion. Discussion: Social workers are critical contributors to practice-based evidence development in health and mental health settings. However, many report a lack of knowledge, confidence and skills in service evaluation and research. The findings demonstrate that social workers are keen to take on practitioner-research roles, that research capacity is enhanced through training particularly with follow-up mentoring to support individual research project development and implementation, and that large system changes need to occur to support social workers to engage in research activities in their work context.
社会工作者临床实践中的研究能力建设:培训和指导方法
摘要目的:本文描述了一个培训和指导计划,旨在提高澳大利亚社区和住院社会工作者的研究能力。方法:21名社会工作者参加了为期24个月的多日培训和后续指导计划(小组和个人)。概述了一种混合方法的准实验评价方法。结果:定量数据显示自我报告的研究能力增加,包括知识,信心,行为和满意度。对于参与者来说,指导方法似乎是一个至关重要的组成部分——因为他们参与研究,愿意或有能力绕过感知到的和实际的障碍,并完成个人的研究项目。研究的一个重要障碍是在他们的临床角色中缺乏可用的研究时间,并且迫使参与者在自己的时间内完成研究项目。此外,个人挑战,如健康和家庭承诺,可以在下班后进行研究,影响了参与和研究项目的完成。讨论:社会工作者是卫生和精神卫生环境中基于实践的证据发展的关键贡献者。然而,许多人报告说,在服务评价和研究方面缺乏知识、信心和技能。研究结果表明,社会工作者热衷于扮演研究实践者的角色,研究能力通过培训得到提高,特别是通过后续指导来支持个人研究项目的发展和实施,并且需要发生大规模的系统变革,以支持社会工作者在其工作环境中从事研究活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信