The tragedy of the Natural History Museum, London

Megataxa Pub Date : 2022-07-11 DOI:10.11646/megataxa.7.1.2
F. Naggs
{"title":"The tragedy of the Natural History Museum, London","authors":"F. Naggs","doi":"10.11646/megataxa.7.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The remit of the Natural History Museum, London, encompasses the whole of the natural world and places it at the forefront of global concerns about human impact on the biosphere. The Museum’s stature as a world leading institution for storing and recording living diversity brings responsibilities, obligations and new prospects. In addition to revealing the genetic evolution of life in considerable detail, advances in molecular biology and cryogenics offer exciting new opportunities to extend beyond the Museum’s traditional role as a storehouse for recording living diversity and to take a lead in biodiversity conservation. \nIn its strategy for the coming decade, the Museum has declared a planetary emergency for which we need an unprecedented response, asserting that we must act now, that we must act on scientific evidence and that we must act together. However, the Museum is no longer led by scientists; its relevant expertise and the prioritisation of its collection-based world-leading role is being rapidly dismantled. It has been taken over by an administrative structure and placed under a government Department that have no notion of the importance of this role. Much of the Museum’s activity is no longer led by science intimately connected to its role as a collections-based institution and its public profile is dominated by journalistic presentations from sources that are widely available to a broad range of the media. Inappropriate leadership and recruitment have diverted its science base in directions that place much of its research within the activities of numerous other academic agencies, undermining the reason and justification for the Museum’s existence. The move of about half of the collections and associated scientific staff to a location outside of London is a self-imposed act of institutional vandalism. It will mutilate a national treasure, not only inflicting a massive and permanent financial burden but also irrevocably damaging the Museum’s, cultural identity and function as an integrated collections and research institution. Rather than responding to a planetary emergency, the Museum is tragically descending into irrelevance.","PeriodicalId":52569,"journal":{"name":"Megataxa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Megataxa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.7.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The remit of the Natural History Museum, London, encompasses the whole of the natural world and places it at the forefront of global concerns about human impact on the biosphere. The Museum’s stature as a world leading institution for storing and recording living diversity brings responsibilities, obligations and new prospects. In addition to revealing the genetic evolution of life in considerable detail, advances in molecular biology and cryogenics offer exciting new opportunities to extend beyond the Museum’s traditional role as a storehouse for recording living diversity and to take a lead in biodiversity conservation. In its strategy for the coming decade, the Museum has declared a planetary emergency for which we need an unprecedented response, asserting that we must act now, that we must act on scientific evidence and that we must act together. However, the Museum is no longer led by scientists; its relevant expertise and the prioritisation of its collection-based world-leading role is being rapidly dismantled. It has been taken over by an administrative structure and placed under a government Department that have no notion of the importance of this role. Much of the Museum’s activity is no longer led by science intimately connected to its role as a collections-based institution and its public profile is dominated by journalistic presentations from sources that are widely available to a broad range of the media. Inappropriate leadership and recruitment have diverted its science base in directions that place much of its research within the activities of numerous other academic agencies, undermining the reason and justification for the Museum’s existence. The move of about half of the collections and associated scientific staff to a location outside of London is a self-imposed act of institutional vandalism. It will mutilate a national treasure, not only inflicting a massive and permanent financial burden but also irrevocably damaging the Museum’s, cultural identity and function as an integrated collections and research institution. Rather than responding to a planetary emergency, the Museum is tragically descending into irrelevance.
伦敦自然历史博物馆的悲剧
伦敦自然历史博物馆的职责范围涵盖了整个自然世界,并将其置于全球关注人类对生物圈影响的最前沿。作为储存和记录生物多样性的世界领先机构,博物馆的地位带来了责任、义务和新的前景。除了相当详细地揭示生命的遗传进化之外,分子生物学和低温学的进步提供了令人兴奋的新机会,使博物馆超越了记录生物多样性的传统角色,并在生物多样性保护方面发挥带头作用。在未来十年的战略中,博物馆宣布了一个全球性的紧急情况,我们需要前所未有的回应,声称我们必须现在就采取行动,我们必须根据科学证据采取行动,我们必须共同行动。然而,博物馆不再由科学家领导;它的相关专业知识和其以收藏为基础的世界领先地位的优先地位正在迅速消失。它已被一个行政结构所接管,并置于一个不了解这一作用重要性的政府部门之下。博物馆的大部分活动不再以科学为主导,这与它作为一个以收藏为基础的机构的角色密切相关,它的公众形象主要由新闻报道所主导,这些报道的来源广泛地提供给各种媒体。不适当的领导和招聘使其科学基础转向了许多其他学术机构的研究活动,破坏了博物馆存在的理由和理由。将大约一半的藏品和相关的科学人员搬到伦敦以外的地方是一种自我强加的机构破坏行为。这将破坏一项国宝,不仅造成巨大而永久性的财政负担,还将不可挽回地损害博物馆的文化身份和作为一个综合收藏和研究机构的功能。博物馆非但没有对全球的紧急情况作出反应,反而可悲地变得无关紧要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信