The results of different labour induction approaches: A Cross sectional study

Jorge Duro Gómez, M. Domínguez, Antonio Jesús de la Torre González, Araceli Lopez Jimenez, Beatriz Pineda Reyes, C. Castelo-Branco
{"title":"The results of different labour induction approaches: A Cross sectional study","authors":"Jorge Duro Gómez, M. Domínguez, Antonio Jesús de la Torre González, Araceli Lopez Jimenez, Beatriz Pineda Reyes, C. Castelo-Branco","doi":"10.15406/OGIJ.2021.12.00561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We created 7 groups. Group A started the induction with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone and they gave birth during that day. Group B started with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone, but the second day they needed another dose of 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone. Group C: started with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone but for 24 hours the cervix was favourable and women continued the induction with oxytocin intravenously until the childbirth. Group D started with 10mg of vaginal dinoprostone the first day, the second they received another dose of 10mg of dinoprostone, and if the cervix was favourable oxytocin was administered. Group E started with 10mg of vaginal dinoprostone and continued with oxytocin the second day. Group F started with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone the first day, the second day they needed another dose of dinoprostone, and the third day they continued with oxytocin until the childbirth. Group G: started with oxytocin from the first day, either because the cervix was unfavourable (Bishop Score ≥6), there was a risk of uterine hyperstimulation or because there were contraindications to administer prostaglandins.","PeriodicalId":19389,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"108-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/OGIJ.2021.12.00561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We created 7 groups. Group A started the induction with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone and they gave birth during that day. Group B started with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone, but the second day they needed another dose of 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone. Group C: started with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone but for 24 hours the cervix was favourable and women continued the induction with oxytocin intravenously until the childbirth. Group D started with 10mg of vaginal dinoprostone the first day, the second they received another dose of 10mg of dinoprostone, and if the cervix was favourable oxytocin was administered. Group E started with 10mg of vaginal dinoprostone and continued with oxytocin the second day. Group F started with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone the first day, the second day they needed another dose of dinoprostone, and the third day they continued with oxytocin until the childbirth. Group G: started with oxytocin from the first day, either because the cervix was unfavourable (Bishop Score ≥6), there was a risk of uterine hyperstimulation or because there were contraindications to administer prostaglandins.
不同引产方法的结果:一项横断面研究
我们创建了7组。A组以阴道迪诺前列酮10 mg开始引产,当日分娩。B组开始时阴道注射10毫克的迪诺前列石,但第二天他们需要另一剂量的阴道注射10毫克的迪诺前列石。C组:开始时阴道使用10毫克迪诺前列酮,但在24小时内宫颈处于有利状态,妇女继续静脉注射催产素诱导,直到分娩。D组第一天开始阴道注射10毫克的迪诺前列石,第二天再注射10毫克的迪诺前列石,如果子宫颈状况良好,就注射催产素。E组开始使用阴道迪诺前列酮10mg,第二天继续使用催产素。F组在第一天开始使用10毫克的阴道迪诺前列酮,第二天他们需要另一剂量的迪诺前列酮,第三天他们继续使用催产素直到分娩。G组:由于宫颈不利(Bishop评分≥6)、存在子宫过度刺激风险或存在前列腺素禁忌症,从第一天开始使用催产素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信