Problems and prospects for european police cooperation after maastricht

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Alain Guyomarch
{"title":"Problems and prospects for european police cooperation after maastricht","authors":"Alain Guyomarch","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1995.9964727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the Maastricht Treaty provision for closer cooperation between EU police forces and a joint agency, Europol, common policy‐making and joint actions remain very difficult and limited in scope. As in earlier institutional frameworks (notably the Trevi, Pompidou and Schengen Groups), the need for unanimity between member‐state governments and the very different patterns and traditions in policing make greater collaboration problematic, despite the growing evidence of common problems. The end of the East‐West divide in Europe has increased the advantages for the governments of EU member‐states in making effective joint policies, especially on cross‐border movements. Achievements in this area, however, remain small, even though increasing numbers of professionals, experts and politicians are voicing their concerns. The “spill‐over” pressure from economic integration has not produced effective supranational policing institutions since member‐states governments have remained resolutely committed to maint...","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1995.9964727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite the Maastricht Treaty provision for closer cooperation between EU police forces and a joint agency, Europol, common policy‐making and joint actions remain very difficult and limited in scope. As in earlier institutional frameworks (notably the Trevi, Pompidou and Schengen Groups), the need for unanimity between member‐state governments and the very different patterns and traditions in policing make greater collaboration problematic, despite the growing evidence of common problems. The end of the East‐West divide in Europe has increased the advantages for the governments of EU member‐states in making effective joint policies, especially on cross‐border movements. Achievements in this area, however, remain small, even though increasing numbers of professionals, experts and politicians are voicing their concerns. The “spill‐over” pressure from economic integration has not produced effective supranational policing institutions since member‐states governments have remained resolutely committed to maint...
《马斯特里赫特条约》后欧洲警察合作的问题与前景
尽管《马斯特里赫特条约》规定欧盟警察部队和一个联合机构——欧洲刑警组织之间进行更密切的合作,但共同政策制定和联合行动仍然非常困难,范围也很有限。正如早期的机构框架(特别是特莱维集团、蓬皮杜集团和申根集团),尽管有越来越多的证据表明存在共同的问题,但成员国政府之间一致的需要以及警务模式和传统的差异使得更大的合作存在问题。欧洲东西方分裂的结束增加了欧盟成员国政府制定有效联合政策的优势,特别是在跨境流动方面。然而,尽管越来越多的专业人士、专家和政治家表达了他们的关切,但在这一领域取得的成就仍然很小。经济一体化的“溢出”压力并没有产生有效的超国家监管机构,因为成员国政府仍然坚决承诺维持……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信