Risk-Based Hoop Stress Factors for Pressure Design

R. Adianto, M. Nessim, Balek Ngandu
{"title":"Risk-Based Hoop Stress Factors for Pressure Design","authors":"R. Adianto, M. Nessim, Balek Ngandu","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-86815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed as an alternative to the class location approach currently used in the Canadian Standard Association’s (CSA’s) Standard Z662. Similar to the current approach, the new approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors, termed class factors, are calibrated to keep the failure probability below an allowable value for the limit states representing burst of undamaged pipe under the operating pressure and failure due to equipment impact loading. Yielding under the strength test pressure is addressed as a separate limit on the class factor. To achieve a consistent safety level for all pipelines, the allowable failure probabilities are inversely proportional to the magnitude of failure consequences, as implied by a safety class determined according to the approach described in a companion IPC paper.\n This paper describes the calibration process used to define the class factors and provides a comparison between the wall thicknesses resulting from the risk-based approach and those obtained from the current hoop stress factors in CSA Z662.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-86815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed as an alternative to the class location approach currently used in the Canadian Standard Association’s (CSA’s) Standard Z662. Similar to the current approach, the new approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors, termed class factors, are calibrated to keep the failure probability below an allowable value for the limit states representing burst of undamaged pipe under the operating pressure and failure due to equipment impact loading. Yielding under the strength test pressure is addressed as a separate limit on the class factor. To achieve a consistent safety level for all pipelines, the allowable failure probabilities are inversely proportional to the magnitude of failure consequences, as implied by a safety class determined according to the approach described in a companion IPC paper. This paper describes the calibration process used to define the class factors and provides a comparison between the wall thicknesses resulting from the risk-based approach and those obtained from the current hoop stress factors in CSA Z662.
基于风险的压力设计环向应力因子
基于风险的压力设计方法已经被开发出来,作为目前加拿大标准协会(CSA)标准Z662中使用的分级定位方法的替代方案。与目前的方法类似,新方法使用一组环向应力因子,根据压力、直径和规定的最小屈服强度计算最小壁厚。对环向应力因子(称为等级因子)进行校准,以使失效概率低于在操作压力和设备冲击载荷下未损坏管道破裂的极限状态的允许值。强度试验压力下的屈服作为类别因子的单独限制来处理。为了实现所有管道的一致安全水平,允许的故障概率与故障后果的大小成反比,正如根据IPC合著论文中描述的方法确定的安全等级所暗示的那样。本文描述了用于定义等级因子的校准过程,并提供了基于风险的方法获得的壁厚与CSA Z662中当前环向应力因子获得的壁厚之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信