Comparison of Experimental Results with Empirical Relationships for Energy Losses in Pipe Flow

Logeepan Yogaraja, Narmada Liyanagamage, K. De Silva
{"title":"Comparison of Experimental Results with Empirical Relationships for Energy Losses in Pipe Flow","authors":"Logeepan Yogaraja, Narmada Liyanagamage, K. De Silva","doi":"10.1109/MERCon52712.2021.9525661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimation of energy losses in pipe flow is a prerequisite in designing pipe networks to verify the energy requirement in transferring fluid between two locations. There are two types of such energy losses namely: major losses which is caused by friction at the interface of pipe and the flow and minor losses which is caused due to local conditions such as sudden contractions, sudden expansions, and bends of the pipeline. In this paper, major and minor losses in pipe flow, calculated from empirical equations are compared with the experimental results using PVC pipes which is a popular commercial pipe category. For comparison on minor losses; Bend, Gradual contraction, Elbow bend, Gradual expansion, and 45 degrees bend which are widely used in distribution networks were used and coefficient of minor losses was used as a comparative factor. For comparison on major losses; PVC pipes with five different diameters were used and head loss vs Reynolds number variation was considered in the comparison. According to the results, the Blasius (1913) equation was found to be more accurate for actual flow, while using the Darcy-Weisbach equation found to be more predictive of the major head losses of water flow in PVC pipes.","PeriodicalId":6855,"journal":{"name":"2021 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","volume":"13 1","pages":"522-527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCon52712.2021.9525661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimation of energy losses in pipe flow is a prerequisite in designing pipe networks to verify the energy requirement in transferring fluid between two locations. There are two types of such energy losses namely: major losses which is caused by friction at the interface of pipe and the flow and minor losses which is caused due to local conditions such as sudden contractions, sudden expansions, and bends of the pipeline. In this paper, major and minor losses in pipe flow, calculated from empirical equations are compared with the experimental results using PVC pipes which is a popular commercial pipe category. For comparison on minor losses; Bend, Gradual contraction, Elbow bend, Gradual expansion, and 45 degrees bend which are widely used in distribution networks were used and coefficient of minor losses was used as a comparative factor. For comparison on major losses; PVC pipes with five different diameters were used and head loss vs Reynolds number variation was considered in the comparison. According to the results, the Blasius (1913) equation was found to be more accurate for actual flow, while using the Darcy-Weisbach equation found to be more predictive of the major head losses of water flow in PVC pipes.
管道流动能量损失的实验结果与经验关系的比较
估算管道流动中的能量损失是设计管网以验证流体在两个位置之间传递能量需求的前提。这种能量损失有两种,一种是由于管道与流动界面处的摩擦引起的大损失,另一种是由于管道的突然收缩、突然膨胀、弯曲等局部条件引起的小损失。本文将经验公式计算的管道流动的主要损失和次要损失与PVC管的实验结果进行了比较。对轻微损失进行比较;采用配电网中常用的弯曲、逐渐收缩、弯头弯曲、逐渐膨胀和45度弯曲,并以小损耗系数作为比较系数。重大损失比较;采用五种不同管径的PVC管材,并考虑了水头损失与雷诺数变化的关系。根据结果,发现Blasius(1913)方程对实际流量更准确,而使用Darcy-Weisbach方程更能预测PVC管道中水流的主要水头损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信